In The Chill Of Night.
- Jul 12, 2011
- Reaction score
Sony is going to make sure that there will never be a new villain to introduce in a Spider-Man movie again.
This idea is just...
Mysterio is one of my all-time favorites, and I want him in a Spider-Man film. Not to see him in his own spinoff. That is stupid.
Who knows for sure what their plan is, until we get more detail info as time goes on. However, given what "I think" I understand, they are simply just getting all the character development(background, maybe origin), personalities, motivations, and skill & abilities, as well as, setup & plot, moving forward to a possible ensemble film(S6). This way, Sony avoid past mistakes, in having to develop so much & boggling it up, in a single film. SM3, TASM2 anyone.They're focusing on the wrong characters/concepts for standalone spin offs.
These are villains (or supporting characters) that should be saved for the main series, interacting with Spidey.
Is it a team up or separate films...the number of article i've read does not make that apparently clear? At the moment, I'm taking it as separate films.The only way I see a Mysterio and Kraven movie working is either we see them making a plan to go after Spider-Man only the film is a villain's perspective, or make it a buddy cop type thing where they are being recruited to the Sinister Six but have to accomplish a task to prove their worth. In this concept, they would have to believe their lives are on jeopardy or something. Only ways I could see this working at all. This project has a high suckage potential.
Okay guys, which Spinoffs would be better than these? I'd say
-Prowler (or even The Outlaws, since Prowler, Puma, Rocket Racer and Sandman have all become good guys at points)
-Superior Foes of Spider-Man
-Firestar (if they can use her)
-Spider-Man 2099, Spider-Gwen, Spider-Girl, Spider-Man Noir, Lady Spider (the dreaded Aunt May spinoff), SP//dr or basically any of the alternate spiders.
Anything I missed?