R_Hythlodeus
Nerd Supreme
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2003
- Messages
- 8,415
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 33
ìm not a big fan of dungeon crawling eitherPortman is munchkin that is a problem.
ìm not a big fan of dungeon crawling eitherPortman is munchkin that is a problem.
That's part of why I like Cobie Smulders for Sif. She's like 5'9". Respectable warrior goddess size.
Also, people putting that pic of Sif next to Portman and saying she looks all right should probably be aware that that's Sif as whatever the Asgardian equivalent to a teenager is. Meaning she's like half a foot shorter than she'll grow up to be and her figure hasn't filled out completely. For comparison, here's what Thor (who's a little older than Sif) looks like in that period, by the same artist, no less:
![]()
Not a scrawny lad by any means, but certainly not as big as we'd like to see Thor on the screen.
Exactly. So many women would be better suited for Sif that can act. This choice is really bad.Meh, there are so many tall actresses who fit the role physically and are still good actresses that I can't help being disappointed that Portman's even being considered.
The female lead in this movie is Sif. If Portman is up for the female lead, she's up for Sif. I have no idea why so many movie "news" sites are complicating this with mentions of Jane Foster, Enchantress, and a female Loki
She'd be fine as any normal woman in the Marvel universe, really. But Sif? The Asgardian equivalent of an Amazon? Eh.I think this is good news if she is cast. She is a talented actress when approaching the right role.
Actually she was my Betty Ross choice before I found out Liv Tyler was doing it.
She looks better now.and doesnt look like that anymore![]()
and doesnt look like that anymore
Except she's 40