Two-Face=Badass
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
- Messages
- 1,950
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
This is similar to what i meant Crook, thanks for posting that EmPiiRe x.it would seem lazy in this sense: forgoing a reinterpretation of the Joker that still keeps the core dynamics of the character, maintaining a balancing act between your own take and the essential aspects of the character, to instead just have him commit "dark and disturbing" acts that, while dark and disturbing, don't fit very well with the Joker character. Like say rape or bursting out in tears . . . They have the Joker do those things, and because they did it first, they can be heralded as innovators, even if it is too far removed from the core character. I'm not saying that's what's happened, but that's definitely possible when you reinvent or reinterpret something so many times. You can eventually dilute the original qualities that made the character popular in the first place.
I haven't read the book either Crook asnd I reckon i'll like it, maybe even love it probably. My point is not that rape or violence is out of place in a comic book at all, but that sometimes it can be used as Get Out Writer's Block Free Card when a writer has no idea how to make a villain threatening other than turning the uber-violence meter up to 10. To me this does seem out-of-character for the Joker, i'll always be of the opinion that no matter what way he becomes, the Joker is always the most fascinating as not a violent, raping criminal, but as a charismatic, smooth talking and genuinely funny madman who is made all the more scary by the fatal punchline.
Another point is that it takes away from the core of what makes the Joker unique. In this book from what I've heard and read he is a gangster, a rapist, uber violent and not really that classy or witty. By making him so violent he does become real yes, but he also becomes Zsasz to me: A boring villain who can make me vomit in disgust every panel, but still won't merit my interest as a character.
Again I say though, I think I really will like this book and most likely buy it, but I will always remain of the opinion that shock value is something that must be earned, not thrown at the reader in the form of standard bloody violence in order to make us see the Joker as a sick guy.
Last edited: