Louis Leterrier Talks Hulk

Discussion in 'Marvel Films' started by TheBeastWithin, Nov 28, 2007.

  1. TheBeastWithin Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    2,071
    Likes Received:
    0
    'HULK' DIRECTOR SPEAKS
    In an exclusive interview, director Louis Leterrier discusses Ang Lee’s film and why he chose the villains he did for 2008’s ‘Incredible Hulk’
    By Rickey Purdin

    Posted November 27, 2007 3:15 PM

    Best known for street-level martial arts flicks such as “The Transporter” and “Unleashed,” director Louis Leterrier gamma-irradiates the big screen on June 13, 2008, with the release of “Incredible Hulk.” Starring (and written by) Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, the titular alter ego of the Green Goliath, along with Liv Tyler as Betty Ross, “Incredible Hulk” acts as a fresh start for the monstrous hero from Marvel Studios after director Ang Lee took a stab at the franchise in 2003.

    “It’s a fresh start because I saw there is a real fan base for Ang Lee’s movie,” said Leterrier of Lee’s ill-received “Hulk” in an exclusive interview with Wizard. “I didn’t want to offend [those fans] in any way, and also I like the movie. It was very interesting. [But] it was weaker ground to build a big franchise upon so we decided to scrap it and establish it from bases that are more comic book-based and TV show-based.”

    “Incredible Hulk” will still feature several elements from the Ang Lee film such as General “Thunderbolt” Ross (played by William Hurt) and his hunt for Banner. But the development of other antagonists takes place in the film, as well. Heading for those comic book roots, Leterrier pit Hulk against someone very familiar to comic book fans.

    “Obviously, General Ross is the villain, so he had to be in it,” added Leterrier. “But the Abomination, Emil Blonsky, was who Marvel wanted to put in this chapter—the first chapter of our new saga—because he’s the most famous. He’s an enemy that can actually threaten the Hulk. It’s very important for me that there is a danger. When Bruce Banner is Hulk, I didn’t feel in Ang Lee’s ‘Hulk’ that there was any threat. He was invincible. So with Abomination there’s actually a monster that can, you know, kill him when he’s in the Hulk form.”
    Played in human form by Tim Roth, Blonsky isn’t the only new character. Look for Doc Samson (played by Ty Burrell) and Samuel “the Leader” Sterns (played by Tim Blake Nelson) when the film powerbombs into theaters next summer

    Source: http://www.wizarduniverse.com/magazine/wizard/006462271.cfm
     
  2. co2 Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    4,694
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really appreciate what Leterrier said here. He seems to have respect for Ang's film but addresses it's shortcomings in a very constructive way.
     
  3. Abaddon Watching

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    38,933
    Likes Received:
    0
    wow, didn't realize they'd include the Leader.
     
  4. Lex Luthor Evildoer

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    9,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's nice of Leterrier to be respectful of Ang's film, and supporters. Good interview.
     
  5. Ahura Mazda Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting interview. I wonder how they changed the script from the one circulated.

    Regarding what he states about Ang Lee, it is as if it was written in a script because he attempts to distance himself from it while attaching validity to the project. The guy could make a good politician. ;)
     
  6. chamber-music Infinity Ammo

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    36,380
    Likes Received:
    2,115
    probaley setting him up for possible sequels which is always works better than a villian just appearing from knowhere
     
  7. AVEITWITHJAMON Darksider

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Messages:
    38,801
    Likes Received:
    3,074
    So is it a sequel or a re-boot? :cwink:
     
  8. Freakout Guest

    I like that Louis wants to give him some vulnerability. That was a huge turn off for me in the first movie. Sure he's nearly unstoppable but you need at least some sense of vulnerability.
     
  9. Movies205 Corporate Money

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    27,512
    Likes Received:
    0
    No it's called class, something far more film-makers and professionals should have.
     
  10. [email protected] MARVEL RULES THE SUMMER!!

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    0
    I totally agree! That was always my major grind with the first movie. Hulk was not challenged enough. Even in Spiderman 1 he had Green Goblin as a villain and I believe that was one of the things that made the film a success. When it come to superhero films you must have a supervillain to challenge them. If all you have is humans with guns the film will be boring. And it would be difficult to have a nail biting climax IMO.
     
  11. TheBeastWithin Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    2,071
    Likes Received:
    0
    Absolutely. You need a real threat or it's meaningless. There's no real heroism if there's no true challenge.
     
  12. EmeraldBeast Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well written. We need to believe in our hero and how can you be a hero with no danger involved.
     
  13. Golgo-13 The Return of the O.G

    Joined:
    May 19, 2003
    Messages:
    27,461
    Likes Received:
    32
    At this point, i don't think even the film makers know.

    And the why the hell did Letterier refer to General Ross as elements of the Ang Lee film he was keeping, as if Ross is exclusively a part that Ang came up with? :huh; Ross is part of the Hulk universe period, just like Commissioner Gorden is in Batman, and J Jonah is in Spiderman.......
     
  14. co2 Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    4,694
    Likes Received:
    0
    On the whole sequel vs reboot...
    I think TIH will simply be a new cast, direction, and feel for the Hulk..but it won't contradict anything in the first film.
    So in essence if you want to consider it a sequel, it won't outright vilolate that idea, and if not, you have that option too.
     
  15. Lex Luthor Evildoer

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    9,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^

    That works.

    And I believe thats the kind of direction Burton took with BR. Where he didnt go the route of making a direct sequel, but rather take the franchise into a different, and new direction. Where the viewer really did not have to see the previous film to enjoy it. Although with Hulk, I'm sure the change in direction will be even more apparent.
     
  16. SpaghettiHULK Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, that really works!
     
  17. AVEITWITHJAMON Darksider

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Messages:
    38,801
    Likes Received:
    3,074
    Ha ha, i was only kidding.

    But yeah, i agree with your points, Ross has been a factor in the Hulk comics for decade's before it was in the movie, and if LL is as big a fan as he claims, he should know this.
     
  18. El Payaso Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think he was honest. :csad:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"