TheFlamingCoco
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 10,479
- Reaction score
- 18
- Points
- 33
^ Yep. Zack should offer a director's cut.
No, they were too.
it's sad to hear people's complaint that superman didn't save enough dan sacrifice enough to protect the people in the movie.
they only see the destruction...
Hey, Open up your eyes and mind!!!
superman has basically saved the entire planet!!! if not, scene like his "dream" would happen. and billions would die!!!
and superman has gone against his father's wish to revive krypton on earth. he has sacrificed his own kryptonian heritage by destroying the ancient ship (FOS) for the people of the earth!!!
what's more, you want him to do!!!???
Exactly.. this is the one complain that is so strong, yet so flimsy... i watched MOS twice.. the second time, i purposely see who he was responsible in killing, and let's face it, there were very little colateral damage caused directly by superman himself.. 99% of the damage was caused by the Terraforming machines... also, in such a fight against an opponent that throws you into buildings, there's no way to avoid it... plus, this is how superman fights in the comics/cartoons.. so, what's the problem?
Some just wanted him to try and save people...I think.
Maybe a more concerned look on his face whilst it happened?
those little close-up scenes wouldnt break or make the movie. Its totally fine for him to concentrate on taking down General Zod. And he has shown more than enough concerns for the people in the last scene.Yes, I can definitely agree with that... I think that is the exact same problem with the entire film.. the cutting, the way each scene is done.. there's something missing..
Like you said, there needs to be some concern on his face as he was thrown into buildings.. maybe a simple look around to see if he hurt anyone, for instance... or, trying his best not to hit something, but failed?
IT's all in the script/screen play... the same thing for every other complain i see.. like lack of character development... because they cut off each scene so prematurely, you don't even have time to let the characters sink in... imagine if they just expanded the oil rig scene to 5 mins for example... or, 10 mins... have them show the workers working, and then explosions, and they can't get out... some manage to, some were stuck... the fire raging.. calls were made out, but no one is near enough... it looks like they are all doomed... then superman, swimming frantically to catch up as he hears them scream from his super hearing.. he was frantic, crawling at the water, bringing up huge waves, storms behind him... and manages to get there just in time.. breaks open the door, have the look or awe extended on the ppl inside, etc, etc... that would have transformed a forgetable scene into an instant classic squivalent to 'SR's Plane rescue scene'... they need do to this for many of the scenes actually.. not just bing bang, throw here throw there, mindlessly...
those little close-up scenes wouldnt break or make the movie. Its totally fine for him to concentrate on taking down General Zod. And he has shown more than enough concerns for the people in the last scene.
What I cant stand are those complaints about the imaginary scenes they have in mind.
Most of the time, it's about the 'little' things that make/break a movie.. in MOS, it's quite apparent that a lot of 'little' things are missing... and that translates to huge disappointment for the critics, and 'meh' from the GA... for fanboys like us, we excuse a lot, so we still give it very high scores...
A good director/writer knows how to tell a story properly... ie, knows what needs to be in a scene, what not...
i disagree. the "little things" you refer to because you have make up your own scenes... just like what i did previously. [thinking by adding a little here and there would make the movie more complete]Most of the time, it's about the 'little' things that make/break a movie.. in MOS, it's quite apparent that a lot of 'little' things are missing... and that translates to huge disappointment for the critics, and 'meh' from the GA... for fanboys like us, we excuse a lot, so we still give it very high scores...
A good director/writer knows how to tell a story properly... ie, knows what needs to be in a scene, what not...
i disagree. the "little things" you refer to because you have make up your own scenes... just like what i did previously. [thinking by adding a little here and there would make the movie more complete]
as a matter of fact, the movie doesn't need those. it is very well explained. it is just going fast and people don't pay enough attention and miss them.
and i disagree the 'meh' from the GA. and the poor rating from the critics i choose to believe they didn't watch the movie with an open mind. they have preference and attachment.
Superman can fight in cities in the cartoon and comics, causing all sorts of destruction and nobody bats an eye.
The simply hypocrisy is outstanding. People wanna go on about "balance" like it actually means anything. Comics are a different medium. Sorry Snyder didn't take 6hrs to show Supes to properly "balance" what you seem to have wanted in your Superman film.
In the cartoons and comics vehicles, all kinds of random objects and building after building get destroyed when Supes and the other heroes throw down and RARELY do we see interludes of Supes saving every kitten and little girl the writers happen to throw into the mix. Do me a favor, and point out all the instances where Supes takes the time to look around, concerned in the cartoons? Please do.
i think the defense they would put up is cartoon isn't real. in movie, you see real building, real human.Superman can fight in cities in the cartoon and comics, causing all sorts of destruction and nobody bats an eye.
The simply hypocrisy is outstanding. People wanna go on about "balance" like it actually means anything. Comics are a different medium. Sorry Snyder didn't take 6hrs to show Supes to properly "balance" what you seem to have wanted in your Superman film.
In the cartoons and comics vehicles, all kinds of random objects and building after building get destroyed when Supes and the other heroes throw down and RARELY do we see interludes of Supes saving every kitten and little girl the writers happen to throw into the mix. Do me a favor, and point out all the instances where Supes takes the time to look around, concerned in the cartoons? Please do.
By showing a Superman not yet capable of inspiring hope being thrust into a situation that will depict such destruction and the impossibility of saving lives on a microcosmic levels is what disappointed me. Don't know about the rest.
uhmm..no...they were scenes of people walking around while Superman were fighting above them. Of course Snyder might say coincidentally Superman punched Zod into the right buildings...and that the building behind him that when Zod though a truck at him was completely empty so Superman didn't have to stop the truck from smashing the building and blowing it up. There was too much chaos for me to believe that Superman knew with certainty any destruction around him would have no impact on any human life. The movie didn't sell that part to me...Snyder cared more about the action.
Most of the time, it's about the 'little' things that make/break a movie.. in MOS, it's quite apparent that a lot of 'little' things are missing... and that translates to huge disappointment for the critics, and 'meh' from the GA... for fanboys like us, we excuse a lot, so we still give it very high scores...
A good director/writer knows how to tell a story properly... ie, knows what needs to be in a scene, what not...
I don't think that the movie was gloomy at all. In order to truly inspire, you need to be pulled into the depths of despair. Zod caused a lot of destruction to be sure. However, Superman responded like a true hero. Not only that, but the military and Daily Planet staff also responded well to the crisis. They're reaction to this crisis gives us hope for the better future. Self-sacrifice is a theme in this movie. Jonathan sacrificed his life to protect Clark. Dr. Hamilton, Col. Hardy, and others sacrificed their lives to stop Zod, and Superman sacrificed his no-kill rule to stop Zod for good. These selfless act gives up hope for a brighter tomorrow, especially now that Superman has been established.