Major Retailers ruin unsold clothing

katie_girl09

All kinds of smexy.
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
4,830
Reaction score
153
Points
73
http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/h-m-and-wal-mart-destroy-and-trash-unsold-goods-562909/
This week the New York Times reported a disheartening story about two of the largest retail chains. You see, instead of taking unsold items to sample sales or donating them to people in need, H&M and Wal-Mart have been throwing them out in giant trash bags. And in the case that someone may stumble on these bags and try to keep or re-sell the items, these companies have gone ahead and slashed up garments, cut off the sleeves of coats, and sliced holes in shoes so they are unwearable.

This unsettling discovery was made by graduate student Cynthia Magnus outside the back entrance of H&M on 35th street in New York City. Just a few doors down, she also found hundreds of Wal-Mart tagged items with holes made in them that were dumped by a contractor. On December 7, she spotted 20 bags of clothing outside of H&M including, "gloves with the fingers cut off, warm socks, cute patent leather Mary Jane school shoes, maybe for fourth graders, with the instep cut up with a scissor, men’s jackets, slashed across the body and the arms. The puffy fiber fill was coming out in big white cotton balls.”

The New York Times points out that one-third of the city's population is poor, which makes this behavior not only wasteful and sad, but downright irresponsible. Wal-Mart spokeswoman, Melissa Hill, acted surprised that these items were found, claiming they typically donate all unworn merchandise to charity. When reporters went around the corner from H&M to a collections drop-off for charity organization New York Cares, spokesperson Colleen Farrell said, “We’d be glad to take unworn coats, and companies often send them to us."

After several days of no response from H&M, the company made a statement today, promising to stop destroying the garments at the midtown Manhattan location. They said they will donate the items to charity. H&M spokeswoman Nicole Christie said, "It will not happen again," and that the company would make sure none of the other locations would do so either. Hopefully that's the final word.
I'm never getting clothes from H&M or Wal-Mart again. :(
 
That's a horrible shame. They could have cut the tags off if they didn't want anyone to know that their clothes were not being bought.
 
The New York Times points out that one-third of the city's population is poor, which makes this behavior not only wasteful and sad, but downright irresponsible.
This.

I don't see how such a practice gets condoned in the first place. Hopefully, their response isn't simply lip service.
 
I wonder if these were company policies, or just something those particular locations thought up. Because one makes Wal-Mart (I'm not familiar with H&M) look even more evil than they already are, while the other just makes the store manager look evil.
 
Well on one hand I applaud at least Walmart for destroying their discarded clothes before they throw them out. :up:

Now if only they can prevent their customers from buying their current clothes as well.
 
Hey! I got all my plain white dress shirts (it was part of the work uniform at Fry's Electronics) from Wal-Mart! They're the only place where I can find 17" neck with 37" sleeves...
 
37" sleeves, do your knuckles drag when you walk? :csad:
 
37" sleeves, do your knuckles drag when you walk? :csad:
No, but I do a mean rendition of King Louie's "I Wanna Be Like You" dance from The Jungle Book.
 
WTF 37" sleeves? Does such a size possibly exist? :huh:
 
WTF 37" sleeves? Does such a size possibly exist? :huh:
Yeah, but it's not the easiest size to find at most clothing stores. It's a 'tall' size in some places.

I'm 5'7" and I have the arm length of a man over 6'. I should've been a boxer. :csad:
 
I have seen this kind of behavior from retail before (considering that I have spent a large part of my working career as a retail manager), but never from a clothes store.

I have worked in stores where we slash up old books and magazines and stuff, for the same reasons that were cited in this article. But typically with clothes, if they aren't sold, the companies have what is typically called "recall", where the clothes are boxed up and sent back to the corporate office, where the corporate office can then send the product back to the distributors and get reimbursed for them.

Or, the product gets moved around within the company to different locations where it may have a better shot at selling.

I have heard of retailers destroying small merchandise, like I said magazines and such, but I've never heard of a retailer destroying actual clothes.

I've never even heard of H&M, but coming from Wal-Mart, why am I not surprised?

It is also a shame that restaurants do this as well. If an order is prepared incorrectly, and cannot go out to the table (which happens fairly frequently), it is the policy to throw the food away. Forget about the fact that it's perfectly good, untouched food, that perhaps the employees would like to eat (I'd recommend giving it to charitable organizations as well, but nachos and burgers don't really sit well for extended periods of time), instead, it is supposed to just get tossed.

Luckily, some of the managers I work with are perfectly fine with letting the employees eat that food, so a bunch of us will often times split a burger, or a plate of nachos, or some wings or something, but a couple of the managers will just throw away perfectly good food.
 
Does Walmart go out of its way to be the bane of human existence? Do the CEOs sit down at board meetings and discuss ways of coming across as soulless bastards?

**** Walmart, man.
 
Yeah, but it's not the easiest size to find at most clothing stores. It's a 'tall' size in some places.

I'm 5'7" and I have the arm length of a man over 6'. I should've been a boxer. :csad:
You know, I confused it with circular perimeter of a sleeve, like waste size. Not thinking straight. :funny:

What's your reach?
 
I have seen this kind of behavior from retail before (considering that I have spent a large part of my working career as a retail manager), but never from a clothes store.

I have worked in stores where we slash up old books and magazines and stuff, for the same reasons that were cited in this article. But typically with clothes, if they aren't sold, the companies have what is typically called "recall", where the clothes are boxed up and sent back to the corporate office, where the corporate office can then send the product back to the distributors and get reimbursed for them.

Or, the product gets moved around within the company to different locations where it may have a better shot at selling.

I have heard of retailers destroying small merchandise, like I said magazines and such, but I've never heard of a retailer destroying actual clothes.

I've never even heard of H&M, but coming from Wal-Mart, why am I not surprised?

It is also a shame that restaurants do this as well. If an order is prepared incorrectly, and cannot go out to the table (which happens fairly frequently), it is the policy to throw the food away. Forget about the fact that it's perfectly good, untouched food, that perhaps the employees would like to eat (I'd recommend giving it to charitable organizations as well, but nachos and burgers don't really sit well for extended periods of time), instead, it is supposed to just get tossed.

Luckily, some of the managers I work with are perfectly fine with letting the employees eat that food, so a bunch of us will often times split a burger, or a plate of nachos, or some wings or something, but a couple of the managers will just throw away perfectly good food.

Yeah...it's really bad in the food business. My first job was working in an amusement park...I was shocked by how much food gets thrown away. :down
 
Does Walmart go out of its way to be the bane of human existence? Do the CEOs sit down at board meetings and discuss ways of coming across as soulless bastards?

They do, while sitting in chairs made of human bones, wearing baby skin suits.
 
I'm going to take an unpopular stance on this and say, their merchandise, their prerogative. They paid for that merchandise so they can do whatever they want with it. I can actually see the logic behind the move, even if it's selfish and greedy.
 
You know, I confused it with circular perimeter of a sleeve, like waste size. Not thinking straight. :funny:

What's your reach?
lol, 37" circumference? That's insane.

I have no idea what my reach is. I'm not a boxer. I checked online, and some sources say reach is measured by wingspan from fingertip to fingertip, which I guess would probably give me a reach close to 70".
 
Maybe they should donate to another country or something. Like pass it to a charity and mandate it.
 
**** man, Manic you coulda, SHOULDA been a boxer. Maybe finally someone could knock that c*** Mayweather out.
 
lol, 37" circumference? That's insane.

I have no idea what my reach is. I'm not a boxer. I checked online, and some sources say reach is measured by wingspan from fingertip to fingertip, which I guess would probably give me a reach close to 70".
Tip to tip (middle finger). That's how they do it in boxing and in MMA.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"