Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]519915[/split]
What is so bad about this latest SNL sketch that he suddenly feels it's also a conspiracy against him? What about all the ones before?
What?
Yep.Because anything in the media post-Billy Bush tapes is a conspiracy against him.
Never mind all the free press he got for 15 months prior- the media is now Evil. I guess we didn't get the memo.
With the arrest of the "Radical Christian Terrorists" in Kansas, and now the fire bombing of a GOP HQ in North Carolina, this election is not going to end well.
The alt right is dangerous.
They're supported by right wing militias, the klan, neo nazis, neoconfederates, racist bikers, etc
Far more dangerous than any major segment supporting Hillary or Bernie.
Trump gave them a voice and now they're hoping for a violent revolution or race war.
None of this violence would be happening with Kasich/Jeb/Rubio vs Hillary.
Ugh....I hadn't heard about either of these events and it sickens me. I've said it before and, once more, I'll say it again; ANY time you get a large group of people together, there are most likely going to be some crazies. We hear all about "radical Islamic terrorists", but less often we hear about how self professed "Christians" commit, or plan to commit, atrocities. Let's call these people who maim and kill innocents what they are; @$$#0les who have no place in any society.
Yes, but since has being Muslim meany you are foreign? Even those who are American citizens are treated differently simply for being Muslim. And we have had plenty of terrorism caused by Christians here. More often then any other group.To be fair the Christian terrorists haven't perpetrated hundreds of incidents across the globe over the last 15 years.
Both are morally equivalent but not pragmatically equivalent.
Also, even though people want to pretend it isn't the case, a society will always be more tolerant of domestic terrorism (from an identity group perspective) rather than foreign terrorism. Nation states are built on the premise of in-group/out-group dynamics, for better and worse.
Indeed they are, but you appear to be deliberately ignoring the increasing extremism coming from the radicals in groups like BLM.
It's pertinent to remember the alt-right has been allowed to fester for over a decade, since Bush junior's tenure I'd say. The regressive leftists have only come to the fore in maybe the last 3 or 4 years. Given the same amount of time both groups will hit levels of irrationality and stupidity we haven't seen before. I'd say the primary reason why the alt-right types will outweigh the regressive leftists, though, is by pure numbers.
That said, each action has an equal and opposite reaction, given enough time the extremist left will match the right, it's just a matter of it building up to a head.
Yes, but since has being Muslim meany you are foreign? Even those who are American citizens are treated differently simply for being Muslim. And we have had plenty of terrorism caused by Christians here. More often then any other group.
There's no comparison.
The alt right won the Republican primaries.
There's no way black militants could win the Democrat primaries.
Black militants are far removed from the Democratic Party. They're on the fringes of BLM which is on the fringes of the Democrats.
The alt right is dangerous.
They're supported by right wing militias, the klan, neo nazis, neoconfederates, racist bikers, etc
Far more dangerous than any major segment supporting Hillary or Bernie.
Trump gave them a voice and now they're hoping for a violent revolution or race war.
None of this violence would be happening with Kasich/Jeb/Rubio vs Hillary.
This would matter if we didn't have laws that supersede religion. We do. If you are Muslim and can't live by US law, you end up in jail or you leave. It is the same with all religion.Because if people are really honest with one another then they'd admit that "foreign" doesn't actually refer exclusively to race as much as it refers to culture. If we look at isolated cases of the 3rd and 4th generation European Muslims who went to join ISIS then we'd see a concrete case of a French/English/German citizen who was "foreign" in the cultural sense.
That's the primary case people are making in regard to Islam, several of the prominent academics and activists being Muslim themselves; Islam in its current guise is culturally incompatible with the progressive nature of Western society.
The biggest global issue is that various cultures are engaging with one another en masse for the first time, and we're seeing the clear differences and incompatibilities come to the fore. There is no escaping the fact that Islam the way it is right now is simply not going anywhere, it doesn't need a qualitative study to determine the Middle East and Western Europe/North America are water and oil. There are several key Muslim proponents suggesting Islamic reform, and they are enthusiastically being shouted down by white leftists as well as the bulk of the Islamic world.
DeadPrez are you familiar with the horseshoe theory? I read about it on Reddit the other day. Basically, it states that the extreme sides of either party have more in common than with the base of the party. So the extreme on either side would be the ends of either side of the horseshoe that is closer to each other than the curve.
This would matter if we didn't have laws that supersede religion. We do. If you are Muslim and can't live by US law, you end up in jail or you leave. It is the same with all religion.
Islamic reform is an odd thing to pitch in the West, because if you are in the West, that is an automatic thing.
That's a fair assessment. My prediction, perhaps biased, is that after 10 or so years of being on the fringe they'll take over the host too - the same way the alt-right has managed to usurp the Republican party. Unfortunately there are very few liberals speaking out against the ideologically radical section of their own party, the same way there was nobody on the Republican side speaking out against the minority radicals several years ago.
DeadPrez are you familiar with the horseshoe theory? I read about it on Reddit the other day. Basically, it states that the extreme sides of either party have more in common than with the base of the party. So the extreme on either side would be the ends of either side of the horseshoe that is closer to each other than the curve.
I definitely see the horseshoe theory applying to the far right vs jihadist.
Patriarchal? Check
Hawkish? Check
Overzealous? Check
Homophobic? Check
Violent? Check
Hateful? Check
Idiotic? Double check
What is the core base of the Republican party at this point? One of the major problems I see is that the base of the Republican party has become more and more extreme.