Batmannerism
Super-unknown
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 7,096
- Reaction score
- 4,769
- Points
- 103
He didn't wholly hate it, I remember he said he was enjoying it up until a certain point which I think was the death of Jonathan Kent (tbh that's one of the things I'd change but for me it's how it was edited) and then I think Superman killing Zod tipped him over the edge. You are a 100% correct when you say that made sense in the story,nthe way it had unfolded. I think the worst criticsm I have heard of that is that the writers shouldn't have put Superman in that position. I ask why shouldn't they? It's very likely if this thing actually happened it would end with one killing the other.
.
yeah, the old "the writers never should have put him in that position" excuse doesn't make any sense to me. it's like saying that certain situations are off the table for certain characters - I think that nearly everything can work, with every character provided they are written in a credible way (particularly one as versatile and popular as Superman - and yes, I totally mean versatile because people who find him one-dimensional either don't understand the character, or have him confused with Captain America).
The death of Zod was perfectly written - Zod forshadows his own demise by stating his death-wish, it's him that puts Superman in the position of killing him - which is many times better than John Byrne's execution story back in the 1980's, of course I still love that story, because in that situation the execution of Zod and his villainous cohorts makes sense too -but MOS does an even better job.
I liked this.....

but this makes more sense

I still struggle with Waid's comments from this article
http://thrillbent.com/blog/man-of-steel-since-you-asked/
ut once moreand this is where I knew we were headed someplace really awfulonce more, Superman showed not the slightest split-second of concern for the people around them. Particularly in this last sequence, his utter disregard for the collateral damage was just jaw-dropping as they just kept crashing through buildings full of survivors. Im not suggesting he stop in the middle of a super-powered brawl to save a kitten from a tree, but even Brandon Routh thought to use his heat vision on the fly to disintegrate deadly falling debris after a sonic boom
This is because Brandon Routh wasn't fighting a homicidal Kryptonian soldier bent on either killing Clark and wiping out humanity, or being killed himself.
He didn't have time to protect bystanders because he was too busy fighting for his life. Ugh !
Superman wins by killing Zod. By snapping his neck. And as this moment was building, as Zod was out of control and Superman was (for the first time since the fishing boat 90 minutes ago) struggling to actually save innocent victims instead of casually catching them in mid-plummet, some crazy guy in front of us was muttering Dont do it dont do it DONT DO IT and then Superman snapped Zods neck and that guy stood up and said in a very loud voice, THATS IT, YOU LOST ME, IM OUT, and his girlfriend had to literally pull him back into his seat and keep him from walking out and that crazy guy was me. That crazy guy was me, and I barely even remember doing that, I had to be told afterward that Id done that, thats how caught up in betrayal I felt. And after the neck-snapping, even though I stuck it out, I didnt give a damn about the rest of the movie.
As the credits rolled, I told myself I was upset because Superman doesnt kill. Full-stop, Superman doesnt kill. But sitting there, I broke it down some more in my head because I sensed there was more to it since Superman clearly regretted killing Zod. I had to grant that the filmmakers at least went way out of their way to put Superman in a position suggesting (but hardly conclusively proving) he had no choice (and I did love Supermans immediate-aftermath reaction to what hed done). I granted that theyd at least tried to present Superman with an impossible choice and, on a purely rational level, and if this had been a movie about a guy named Ultraguy, I might even have bought what he did. But after I processed all that, I realized that it wasnt so much my uncompromising vision of Superman that made this a total-fail moment for me; it was the failed lead-up TO the moment
Like I said, I went into the film, expecting to hate it because Superman doesn't kill. But MOS sold me, while Waid was opting out, I was buying in. This is a different vision of Superman and one that works in today's world. In terms of other choices, I won't even go there, people have done that one to death - because that's what it was, death, either Clark and humanity or Zod.
As for not struggling to save people, clearly Waid missed the bits where Superman saved the chopper pilot (that wasn't casual at all, as Supes gets nailed afterwards) save Lois in the pod plummetting to Earth, destroy the World Engine (which saved all life on earth), smash the scoutship off course (saving everyone on the plane so they could carry out their mission).
My overall feeling is that people formed IMPRESSIONS of the film while watching it, that don't necessarily match up with what actually went down.
That *%&$&* Nick Mundy is particularly bad for this.
I mean, comments about the "endless destruction" of Zod v Superman ? the fight takes about 5 minutes in total. As for the destruction in Metropolis, in the comics and animated films property damage is the norm !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpoV5pj1Agw