So, my brother is a cop. And, I have several friends who are cops. All of them speak Spanish fluently because there is a high percentage of Spanish speaking people in this area. My wife and I also have friends who are cops in the Little Odessa section of NYC and they speak Russian fluently, one because he grew up there and the other because he knew he needed to be able to do so to make his job easier. Is it inconvenient for them to have to learn another language? Possibly. But it's a hell of a lot more practical than dreaming up some impossible to implement and enforce idea of forcing everyone in this country to learn English with the threat of some sort of repercussion like imprisonment or deportation as a result. Is it an ideal situation? Absolutely not and I've never said as much. Would it be better if everyone spoke English (and we've got quite a few natural born U.S. citizens who speak their own regional version of English that makes communication with them difficult as well)? Absolutely. However, this IS supposed to be a free country, founded on the idea that people can be whoever and whatever they want to be here and live life the way they want to, by their own free will. I get a little bit worried when I see people starting to advocate trampling all over that basic tenet of our society; particularly for something that affects them so very little.
The situation with the shop owner is sort of the same situation in reverse, though, isn't it? He's being told "learn Spanish or get out", essentially, which isn't right, either. To me, the debate on "learn English or get out" has no merit because it goes directly against the grain of what this country is supposed to represent and completely impossible to enact and enforce anyway. It's a giant straw dog as far as issues go.
Newsflash, Sparky: Saying that you hate a group of people because they don't speak your language and that they should be imprisoned or deported if they won't *IS* bigoted. :duh: Lost In Space was a good show, though.
Land of the free, home of the brave....but only if you speak English. Nice.
Maybe, maybe not. But, please....give me an example of this happening. You're running around like Chicken Little over this "issue", here (mostly just saying inflammatory things in response to other people's comments to keep the arguments going rather than really providing anything new), like it's some sort of new phenomenon that we all have to suddenly contend with. There have been people living in this country who didn't speak English since the country STARTED. It doesn't seem to have caused such a major issue for these emergency services folks to date. There's no sudden crisis because of it. So, please, give me some examples of how this is now such a big issue because it's caused widespread problems that have resulted in tragedy and lawsuits.
So, what if Congress does decide to make English our "official" language. What then? What does that change? Will it force people to learn it? No. Will we force people to learn it or suffer the consequences? Entirely unfeasible from a cost and manpower standpoint. So what will that do? Make people like Celldog and casey feel all warm and fuzzy that English is the "official" language? It sure as hell won't change anything else.
Here's the problem, though;
we're talking about imposing the will of a subgroup of people on another subgroup of people, FORCING them to be like the subgroup of people who wants to impose that will. Nobody else sees a problem with that? Why don't we just force them to be Christian while we're at it? And Republican, too? And let's force them to do certain jobs as well. Oh, and we should only allow them to have one child per family, preferably a boy. And let's not stop with just the people who don't speak English, let's do that with every American citizen while we're at it. Don't like it, you get shot in front of your family. That'll demotivate the dissenters. Starts sounding a whole lot like Communist China, to me.
jag