Marvel Now

Status
Not open for further replies.
Deadpool #1 Variant cover by Chris Bachalo:
marvelnow_deadpool_1_02.jpg


Comicbookresources has cover #2 for A + X:http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=40444
1344958246.jpg
 
Why does Marvel keep letting Bachalo draw stuff for them? His art is always indecipherable.
 
Apocalypse was one of my least favourite X-men villains until Uncanny X-force, so who knows what he'll do with Zola. I don't know how I feel about the Green Skull.

Wait a sec? How did the Green Skull escape from the Amalgam Universe?

Lex_Luthor_Amalgam.png


:oldrazz: *just kidding*
 
JIM2011646_02.jpg

Marvel's latest "Next Big Thing" conference call with the comic book press is all about the new Journey Into Mystery creative team, and based on the art released to reporters, it looks like writer Kathryn Immonen and artist Valerio Schiti.

Additionally, the cover clearly suggests a shift of focus in the series from Kid Loki — the star of writer Kieron Gillen's run on the title, which ends in October — to another Asgardian, Sif.

The conference is scheduled to start at 3 p.m. eastern time and Newsarama will be on the line, keep refreshing this page for live updates from the call.

Marvel's James Viscardi starts the call by confirming that Kathryn Immonen (on the line for the conference, along with series editor Lauren Sankovitch) is indeed the new writer of Journey Into Mystery.

Sankovitch explains the shift from Loki to Sif: "Going forward with #646, we really wanted to mix it up a little bit, and try a new focus, but still keep the same level of excitement and character drama, and sheer fun, that people have come to expect from the book."

"Naturally, Kathryn was at the top of my list of people who had a good handle on character, and keeping things interesting, and telling compelling, exciting stories," Sankovitch continued.

Sankovitch discloses that it was her idea to make Sif the lead character, calling her "a warrior born" who "has a lot of fight and verve and fire to her."

Immonen says that the central question for any character is what they want, and what Sif wants is to be a better warrior. "In doing that, on her journey, she makes some terrible decisions, and she puts a lot of people in peril."

Sif will be a journey on self-discovery, and will be explored away from her relationships to Thor and Heimdall.

Immonen says that in the first few issues things go "terribly, terribly wrong" for Sif on her journey. "In fact, you might say things go berserk," Sankovitch adds.

Sankovitch explains that she was alluding to the "Berserker Spell," which Sif sees as a way for her to become the "ultimate warrior."

"With every spell, as we all know, there are consequences for actions you might take," Sankovitch says.

What familiar characters will be involved beyond Sif? Immonen says that they're looking at the Asgardians and the series itself in a way that she doesn't think has done before, so there will be familiar faces, but maybe not the ones that readers expect.

"They all are familiar faces from Journey Into Mystery, for sure," Sankovitch says.

Immonen says that she believes that since Asgardian characters don't have civilian alter egos, they're almost "more human" to write.

First press question asks for more on Immonen's take on Sif. "I don't feel that she's just a warrior," Immonen says. "I kind of liken her to — and this is going to sound terrible — like my dog. My dog is this committed hound dog. He just assumes that you're right behind him with whatever energy he has. Sif just leaps, she never looks back."

Immonen says she also sees a similarity between Sif and Loki, since "neither of them can ever be Thor."

Next press question - does the cover to #646 contain any hints? Immonen says she hasn't actually seen it. Sankovitch answers that it's something of a metaphor for the Nine Realms, in that though it's anchored in Asgard, there are opportunities to be told throughout.

Next press question - who is the artist on the book? As surmised from the cover info, it's Valerio Schiti, who has worked on IDW's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles comics.

Sankovitch calls his art "very exciting," and compliments his ability to draw non-human creatures.

Next press question - any classic runs on Thor that have inspired your story? Immonen says not directly. "Sif herself has been an ancillary character. I think there's a lot of her that's completely unexplored. I'm not really looking to look backwards, or call back to previous Thor story arcs in that way."

Next press question (via Newsarama) - does Sif starring in a series point to any possible synergy between Marvel publishing and Marvel Studios, and a bigger role for the character in 2013's Thor: The Dark World?

"As of right now, we're doing Sif because we think she's pretty great," Sankovitch responds. "Looking for a character that could take us in a new, fun direction. She's a doer, she's an adventurer that can kind of lead this title to its next chapter. And if Marvel Studios wants to do something based on my book, I have no problem with that."

Next press question was similar, asking if any plot elements might be similar between the comic and the movie. Sankovitch says that's not the plan as of now, but it remains to be seen in the future if anything "trickles in."

Next press question concerns Immonen's thoughts on following Kieron Gillen's run on the series. Immonen says it was "daunting" to follow what Gillen did. "I love the tone of what he did," she adds. "My fervent hope is to follow with the same spirit of adventure that book embodies. We're looking at this Sif story as a first arc. There is not a 23-issue arc currently planned out. That's not where we're headed, and I think it would be foolish for me to think that would be possible."

What tone is Immonen looking to establish? "There's a lot of kicking ass and not taking a lot of names in this one," Immonen answers. "She's an action hero and a fighter in a way that Loki is not. Maybe what I do a little bit differently than other people is that I don't use the talking to get to the fighting, I use the fighting to get to the talking. So that's where I am with that."

Another question from Newsarama — does Sif see a lot of room to add new layers to Sif as a character? "Yeah, I hope so. It would be sad if that's not the case," she answers. "I think she is really interesting and unusual."

Is Immonen planning on further exploring Marvel's take on Asgardian mythology? "I think it's very challenging. You see names in the Marvel U for Norse gods, and you go and look them up, and it's something completely different."

Who will Sif face in the series? "Lots of monsters," Immonen says. She'll also face a "group of guys with an unusual relationship." Sankovitch says they're a group of warriors who are a "little out of touch."

Viscardi wraps up: Journey Into Mystery #646, from writer Kathryn Immonen and artist Valerio Schiti and starring Sif, is out in November.

http://www.newsarama.com/comics/new-journey-into-mystery-creative-team.html
 
Last edited:
On one hand I'm thrilled to see that JiM isn't getting cancelled or rebooted but on the other hand I'm concerned how a creative shuffle could effect the book.

I'm gonna stick it out, Kathryn Immonen is a pretty good writer for the most part.
 
Why does Marvel keep letting Bachalo draw stuff for them? His art is always indecipherable.


His art may not be everyone's cup o' tea, but that Deadpool cover is hardly "indecipherable"
Very stylized, yes, but I like his art attached to more humerous stories
 
I like Bachalo, it's stylistic.

Ramos is the guy Marvel should be dumping.
 
Why does Marvel keep letting Bachalo draw stuff for them? His art is always indecipherable.
Oh, please. There's not a thing indecipherable about either of the covers that apparently prompted this comment.

Furthermore, whether because he worked it out of his own system or because of Jason Aaron's scripts, Bachalo's been doing some of his cleanest work in years over on Wolverine and the X-Men.
 
I wasn't referring specifically about that cover. But every time I see his art, I'm reminded of how much I have to work to figure out what's going on in his panels.

I haven't read any of Wolverine and the X-Men. The last thing of his I've seen was his Brand New Day Spider-Man work.
 
Oh, please. There's not a thing indecipherable about either of the covers that apparently prompted this comment.

Furthermore, whether because he worked it out of his own system or because of Jason Aaron's scripts, Bachalo's been doing some of his cleanest work in years over on Wolverine and the X-Men.

He's not referring to just this cover, he's talking about the majority of Bachalo's work. I agree with him, a lot of the time it does get messy and it's hard to tell what's going on. He's ok as far as I'm concerned, there's way worse artists at Marvel.
 
His Wolverine & the X-Men has been decent but paled once you saw it contrasted against Nick Bradshaw's art. He really has warn on me through the years. I loved him back during his early Generation X days but it's sorta been downhill from there.
 
I like Bachalo's art much better than Bradshaw's. Bachalo's is more creative, artistically pleasing, and generally utilzes a better color palate.
 
To me, Bachalo has done some good work, but a lot of his stuff, most of his stuff really, is a complete mess. His females all look like 12 year old girls and his males look like angry dwarves.
 
Bachalo has done good work, yes, both in the past and at present. I'm not exactly a fan of his stuff. He works on some titles, Wolverine and the X-Men being one of them, though there are doubtless other artists who would work just as well if not better, and Bradshaw is in that class when it comes to WatXM.

The point was, claiming he should go the way of the dodo when his Where's Waldo? days are seemingly behind him is silly. Ignorance isn't really a justifiable defense in anything, and it was the display of two clean covers that prompted the comment. Unless, I guess, that the general reaction to any mention of Bachalo ever is "Get rid of the ****er," in which case, dead horse has been beaten once more?
 
I'm happy that JiM is keeping their numbering...
 
It sounds like it could be fun, though I'll miss Gillen writing the exploits of Kid Loki.
 
Why arre folks complaining about double ship. I like that for story reasons. But I can see that price is a issue for some.
 
I will admit, stories do flow much better when you're reading them on a bi-weekly basis.

Honestly, I'd probably like the double shipping, if I was only paying 2 dollars an issue instead of 4.
 
Pfft, if there was ever a reason to trade wait, it's having to pay 4 bucks an issue. :o
 
I will admit, stories do flow much better when you're reading them on a bi-weekly basis.

Honestly, I'd probably like the double shipping, if I was only paying 2 dollars an issue instead of 4.

Exactly, but what absolutely kills me about this is that double shipping the $3.99 books has essentially killed Marvel's lower tier line. If they keep shipping their headlining books, their lower tier line will still be doomed. Maybe a few books like Amazing Spider-Man and the Avengers and price them at $2.99, but this is just too much.
 
Why arre folks complaining about double ship. I like that for story reasons. But I can see that price is a issue for some.

I have a fixed budget for comics and I typically buy up to that budget. Come November I will be buying 9 titles from Marvel. The problem is, they are double shipping 6 of those titles (5 of them $4). Also,they raised the price of X-Men Legacy (and double shipped it) and for one of the New Avengers issues so that's another $3 more a month. So that's suddenly an extra $23 that I can't afford to spend. So due to Marvel's double shipping I have to drop or skip $23 worth of titles from my monthly load. I don't want to drop a few books but now because of Marvel double shipping titles, I have to drop titles that I really enjoy. In essence, they're squeezing me off of titles I really want to read.

Case in point - my November buy list:

Total: $96

Marvel $4 – $49
Uncanny Avengers 2
All New X-Men 1
All New X-Men 2
X-Men Legacy 1
X-Men Legacy 2
New Avengers 33
New Avengers 34 ($5)
Wolverine & the X-Men 20
Wolverine & the X-Men 21
Uncanny X-Force 33
Uncanny X-Force 34
Defenders 12

Marvel $3 – $15
X-Factor 246
X-Factor 247
Hawkeye 4
Captain Marvel 7
Gambit 5


Marvel Minis & One-Shots – $0

DC – $32
Justice League 14 ($4)
Justice League Dark 14
Batman 14 ($4)
Batman Inc. 5
Talon 2
Nightwing 14
Phantom Stranger 2
Green Lantern 14
Batwoman 14
Batman & Robin 14


As of right now here is my planned buy list for November. I planned on trying out Hawkeye and Captain Marvel for a few more issues. I also wanted to try Indestructable Hulk and maybe Captain America. The problem is, my budget has lately shrunk and I try to keep it between $70 and $80 a month. So I am between $16 to $26 over budget, and that's not even including Hulk or Cap. So in order for me to afford my comics I have to drop the titles I'm testing entirely (Hawkeye, Gambit, and Captain Marvel). That's only $9. Now I have to start dropping titles that I actually care about, and since my upper titles are the ones Marvel is double shipping, it has to come from elsewhere. I've been on X-Factor since day one (hit and miss) but suddenly I can't afford it and I have to drop that book. That's $15. That hits the upper rank of what I can afford but I hate being at that point so I am also considering getting rid of Batwoman and Batman & Robin, though I've been trying to hold onto those two titles and I try to not ding DC when Marvel does stupid crap like this.

So all in all, because of Marvel's double shipping, I am dropping or potentially dropping:

X-Factor
Gambit
Hawkeye
Captain Marvel
Batwoman
Batman & Robin

And I actually WANT to buy those titles. And THAT'S why double shipping is stupid. Yeah, it's good for the title they're double shipping but these other books are getting the flack for it just so people with budgets can afford to continue with the books that are double shipped.
 
Last edited:
Don't buy All New X-Men.

That's downright masochistic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"