Marvel's movie rights question

[Evil Twin]

the problem with the non Marvel studio films is that Marvel makes very little on them.

We don't know how much or how little Marvel actually makes on other studio's films. Granted, not as much as on their own successful films, but it's possible that Marvel made more on X-Men: FC than they did on The Incredible Hulk.

The upside to non Marvel studio films is that Marvel shares none of the financial risk.

 

[Gabe99]

From Variety:
Trank rolling toward 'Fantastic Four' - Fox keen on 'Chronicle' helmer for superhero reboot

Though Marvel owns and finances properties like "Iron Man" and "Thor," Fox controls "Fantastic Four" in perpetuity -- as long as it continues making the films. Fox has the same arrangement on Marvel Comics properties "X-Men," "Daredevil" and "Silver Surfer." Marvel is a producer and financial participant through a licensing agreement.

 

[roach]

And there you have it

 

[Hawkingbird]

Really? I thought Marvel didn't have TV rights to Daredevil & Ghost Rider.

I think there's a distant connection