• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Dark of the Moon Megan Fox WON'T be in TF3

that's essentially what he did with megan fox. He told the casting director to find the hottest 18 year old she could find. and once she came, bay asked her "do you look good in a belly shirt" and "can you run".

straight from the horses mouth on the DVDs.

so while its' true this could have been a opportunity for bay to cast someone good like natalie portman or rachael mcadams or in that line, you can't really deny megan's place in the franchise, and it's really not that much of a stretch to hire RHW

Uh she was in Hope and Faith. She had experience, albeit it wasn't a fantastic resume but it is better than 2009 New York Fashion Week.

Megan Fox isn't a great actress, everyone knows that. Someone a lot better could have been cast in the first movie. She was cast, and we have had her for two movies now. To then go and fire her to replace her with someone who has zero experience and a fantastic body is idiotic...if that is indeed the case and this isn't all a ploy by Bay to get the media in a frenzy. Now we will get a third movie with a worse actress, plot holes and conveniences to fill the gaps, and a new dynamic regarding chemistry between the actors. This has disaster written all over it.
 
Uh she was in Hope and Faith. She had experience, albeit it wasn't a fantastic resume but it is better than 2009 New York Fashion Week.

Megan Fox isn't a great actress, everyone knows that. Someone a lot better could have been cast in the first movie. She was cast, and we have had her for two movies now. To then go and fire her to replace her with someone who has zero experience and a fantastic body is idiotic...if that is indeed the case and this isn't all a ploy by Bay to get the media in a frenzy. Now we will get a third movie with a worse actress, plot holes and conveniences to fill the gaps, and a new dynamic regarding chemistry between the actors. This has disaster written all over it.
I know she was in that one Lohan Disney movie also. Confessionals of a Teenage Drama Queen. (Not a great movie, but its still something compared to Miss Model Nothing) and a Olsen Twins movie. Still not the greatest, but still something.
 
i still think we have to keep in mind that it is a transformers movie. maggie gynllehaal is a better actress than katie homes on paper, but i thought she was a terrible rachael dawes compared to her.

like i said, firing fox would have been a perfect opportunity for a good actress like mcadams or portman, but i think it would be wasted talent for them. a realistic step up would be alba.

you guys can say experience all you want, none of it showed in the movie. and like i mentioned, everyone has a day 1, including many model-turned-actors.
 
Last edited:
Uh she was in Hope and Faith. She had experience, albeit it wasn't a fantastic resume but it is better than 2009 New York Fashion Week.

Megan Fox isn't a great actress, everyone knows that. Someone a lot better could have been cast in the first movie. She was cast, and we have had her for two movies now. To then go and fire her to replace her with someone who has zero experience and a fantastic body is idiotic...if that is indeed the case and this isn't all a ploy by Bay to get the media in a frenzy. Now we will get a third movie with a worse actress, plot holes and conveniences to fill the gaps, and a new dynamic regarding chemistry between the actors. This has disaster written all over it.

in my post, i didn't deny that she had experience, just that she wasn't hired because of it.
 
BAY makes KICK-ASS, action, blockbusters... thats what he does! He doesn't make deep though provoking films, so stop complaining about the movie for having a bad actress and a ****** plot. You go to see his movies to see HUGE ****ing explosions and hot chicks.
 
if he had a kick ass script/story and strong actors it wouldn't hurt.
ala The Rock
 
if he had a kick ass script/story and strong actors it wouldn't hurt.
ala The Rock

i sometimes forget how awesome the Rock was. it seems like bay is creating more and more of a caricature of himself with each successive movie. with that being said, i always liked his movies, it's always a guaranteed good time at the movies.
 
I defend her replacement because she's being unfaily judged, it's that simple.
for me to say she's a good actress is no different than anyone saying she's a bad one. I say we judge her when we see her in action.

I agree completely. It's incredibly stupid to judge someone before you actually see what they're capable, or not capable, of.
 
Last edited:
We have all seen Fox's acting ability but we haven't seen this model chicks. To be fair we don't know if she is bad because we haven't seen her act yet. I think that she has a 90% chance of being a bad actress but we just don't know yet.

And it's as unfair to call her a **** as it is to call Megan Fox one.
 
Anyone on these boards calling either of these girls, or any for that matter, a **** is a pathetic, disgusting, worthless, dickless, scumsucking guttertrash.
 
Last edited:
Hasn't Fox been dating BAG for a couple of years now? Nothing says "****" like a long term, committed relationship :yay:
 
Hasn't Fox been dating BAG for a couple of years now? Nothing says "****" like a long term, committed relationship :yay:
For like the last 4-5 years. So yeah, what a **** she is. Committed to one man only.
 
Anyone on these boards calling either of these girls, or any for that matter, a **** is a pathetic, disgusting, worthless, dickless, scumsucking guttertrash.
Or spewing typical fanboy hyperbole, this time aimed at a woman.

Actually, I didn't get all up in feminist arms like I usually do. :oldrazz: I've seen enough rape jokes aimed at men, I guess I'm hardened to it now. :o

i sometimes forget how awesome the Rock was. it seems like bay is creating more and more of a caricature of himself with each successive movie. with that being said, i always liked his movies, it's always a guaranteed good time at the movies.
At least The Rock was fun. I caught the last few minutes of TF1 on TV last week and it just...made no sense. It's like you said, a caricature of his older movies.

And with the new VS ad on Rosie, it's pretty much turned into farce. And I feel bad for the crew since it's obvious that SOMEbody's working really hard on these movies. They're great productions. But wasted on such trite stupidity. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for fun light movies. The Mummy and ID4 are particular guilty pleasures of mine. But TF1 was just....stupid. Ugh.
 
Or spewing typical fanboy hyperbole, this time aimed at a woman.

Actually, I didn't get all up in feminist arms like I usually do. :oldrazz: I've seen enough rape jokes aimed at men, I guess I'm hardened to it now. :o


At least The Rock was fun. I caught the last few minutes of TF1 on TV last week and it just...made no sense. It's like you said, a caricature of his older movies.

And with the new VS ad on Rosie, it's pretty much turned into farce. And I feel bad for the crew since it's obvious that SOMEbody's working really hard on these movies. They're great productions. But wasted on such trite stupidity. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for fun light movies. The Mummy and ID4 are particular guilty pleasures of mine. But TF1 was just....stupid. Ugh.


I just wanted to say 'dickless, scumsucking guttertrash'. :woot:

TF1, ID4 and The Mummy are three of my favourite movies. I've lost count how many times I've watched them.
 
Last edited:
BAY makes KICK-ASS, action, blockbusters... thats what he does! He doesn't make deep though provoking films, so stop complaining about the movie for having a bad actress and a ****** plot. You go to see his movies to see HUGE ****ing explosions and hot chicks.

anyone who expects anything else needs a reality check/wake up call. Either that or a serious ***** slap across the face for being so naive and clueless
 
Yeah, it's simple. If you don't like Bay's movies, DON'T ****ING WATCH THEM!!!!!
 
don't watch them, and don't bring the negativity to a Bay forum or thread. The man has been around for X years and made X movies, it shouldn't be a mystery what the man's about. It's really that simple but a lot of people here don't understand that concept

and THAT is sad
 
Have You noticed how people who claim they hate his movies have seen every 1 of them? More than once. It makes no sense at all, does it? :woot:
 
they rip on Bay's movies while Bay laughs all the way to the bank, with THEIR money, EACH AND EVERY TIME

sad and hillarious
 
I want T3 to open with the reveal that Mikaela was squished when Bumblebee accidentally sat on her.
 
Bay's female leads have always been so irrelevant that it doesn't matter if he now chooses a non-actor for such a part.

Bay is Bay and after all these years I don't understand why certain fanboys expect 'better' (I don't care for him btw but I understand where his defenders are coming from to an extent) from him.

The Rock, which always gets dragged up in conversations when ppl believe he can deliver much better movies, benefited largely from an A-list leading man (Sean Connery) who brought his own screenwriters to the project screenwriters that ended up rewriting the whole film. The Michael Bay of today has more control over his vision(if one can call it that) than he did 15 years ago when more experienced/powerful hands were able to make creative decisions above his head.

With ARMAGEDDON, PEARL HARBOUR (the original script which he changed into the laughable pic we got) TF1, 2 etc we are seeing what Bay dictates to be entertaining so asking for him to change is pointless.
 
the "original" armageddon and perl harbour scripts were laughable at best.
or do you think if sean connery (the great modern talent that he is) could have turned both of those into 2001 and platoon/apocolypse now?

the producers concieve the ideas in those cases and without don simpson on board, bruckhiemer(sp) is a red headed lunatic that only has the first pirates going for him.

TF 1 was a great mainstream movie.
TF 2 needed a script.
 
the "original" armageddon and perl harbour scripts were laughable at best.
or do you think if sean connery (the great modern talent that he is) could have turned both of those into 2001 and platoon/apocolypse now?

the producers concieve the ideas in those cases and without don simpson on board, bruckhiemer(sp) is a red headed lunatic that only has the first pirates going for him.

TF 1 was a great mainstream movie.
TF 2 needed a script.

So what? Are you actually going to suggest to me that what we got improved both those movies? Particularly PEARL HARBOUR?

And THE ROCK, action aside, is mostly liked, I find, because of the dialogue and interplay between characters. Dialogue that was either mostly rewritten when Connery brought in writers or ad-libs by Cage and Ed Harris.

And sorry if we disagree on this but Don Simpson still being alive wouldn't have made a difference to the low quality of the Bruckenheimer produced Bay movies. As a team they still cranked out DAYS OF THUNDER and BEVERLY HILLS COP II (2, imo, pieces of ****).
 
So what? Are you actually going to suggest to me that what we got improved both those movies? Particularly PEARL HARBOUR?

maybe, maybe not, maybe the guy from prince of persia could have turned out the same box office as bay seemed..hypotheticals I suppose. My retort was aimed at your statement that bay made those movies...those scripts worse. I just pointed out that they were already bad.

And THE ROCK, action aside, is mostly liked, I find, because of the dialogue and interplay between characters. Dialogue that was either mostly rewritten when Connery brought in writers or ad-libs by Cage and Ed Harris.

it's possible, but it's also an ungrounded statement again. grain of salt.
fact is the last time connery "brought in his writers" it resulted in lxg and a blowout with the director of (my cherished) blade.

And sorry if we disagree on this but Don Simpson still being alive wouldn't have made a difference to the low quality of the Bruckenheimer produced Bay movies. As a team they still cranked out DAYS OF THUNDER and BEVERLY HILLS COP II (2, imo, pieces of ****).

maybe, maybe not. But here's a fact: the don simpson bay produced films were much better than the non simpson ones. not including the speilberg ones that is.
days of thunder and bev cop are tony scott films and eventhough I'm not his biggest fan Top Gun was pretty good.
as was Crimson Tide.

I'd Kill for a film made by the three of them right about now, but that's just me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"