Dark of the Moon Megan Fox WON'T be in TF3

with that logic megan is by default a better actress than any and all new fresh actresses out there.

they shouldn't have cast Gemma for bond, they should have gone with the tried and true fox...
 
Last edited:
Or at 90% of the actresses in Hollywood sans makeup, for that matter?

Rosie is at least as attractive as Megan Fox, and more shapely, imo. And she's cheaper :doh: which means that's one more fight scene we'll get to see.
:lmao:

Rosie certainly has a striking appearance and can work in front of a camera, but shapely she is not. VS has very good pushup bras for that. :cwink:

It boggles my mind how people find her unattractive. Seriously? ...if she didn't "steal" the role from Megan would she still be so hated?
I just find the whole situation deplorable, but more toward Bay and VS than Rosie. Girl just wants to get a job, she's not conspiring this whole upstaging Megan Fox thing.

Some models can act. Charlize Theron, Natalie Portman, Halle Berry were all models. But they didn't advertise their modeling experience publicly when they acted. They let the acting work show.

Here, Rosie's main pull is that she is a VS model. Heck, VS even has a frickin advertisement about it now. That's the #1 sign that she/Bay/VS isn't taking this seriously.

And yeah, I know that Bay picks hot girls for his movies, but actually getting a VS model hot off the runway/catalog is really getting into farce-land.
 
with that logic megan is by default a better actress than any and all new fresh actresses out there.

they shouldn't have cast Gemma for bond, they should have gone with the tried and true fox...
for for everything

Gemma had like four lines and she isn't a great actress either:huh:

The logic is that firing someone who has been in two movies to replace her with a model with no acting experience is asinine, hence my comparison to Paris Hilton. It is going to make the third movie worse because now we get plot holes and script conveniences. It will probably be a throwaway line by Shia as to why Megan isn't in this movie.

If it was someone who graduated from acting school and this was her big break, then I would give her a chance. The fact that they hired a model with no acting background shows you that they hired her for her face, boobs, and butt over acting chops.

It would be like replacing Katie Holmes in TDK not with Maggie G, but with Adriana Lima. Or even worse, Adriana is a completely new character and Rachel just went somewhere else or died in between movies and it is referenced by a character with one line.
 
thing is in the tf movies, fox doesn't have a demanding character(acting chops wise)

I don't see Fox being able to pull of an assistant DA in a nolan movie, I really don't.
fact is fox is playing a hot air head that acts like she's overwhelmed and annoyed with her boy friend. Are you telling me that, that requires chops that a vs model lacks?

when movies cast ludacris(the actor) they get him for a certain kind of part well within his range...hell look at monique.
playing opposite the over talking shia in an tentpole film is something I think a VS model can do.

as for why fox was "replaced"
i'm sure it has more to do with her behaviour as well as her wanting to leave and less to do with bay wanting someone "hotter"
 
and no, gemma isn't great but if she was cast i'm sure your arugments would have a differn't structure to them...
hence my point.

a good actor is simply that, a good actor.
a filmography is just a bonus.
 
But Gemma wasn't a full time model with no acting experience or tutelage...like this girl is so I don't see the comparison. I would if Gemma was a full time model with no former acting classes.

I also just found out that Gemma has polydactylism...so I guess she has 6 toes:wow:
 
I just see people are gonna complain no matter what? and I can guarantee the same people who said give this chick a chance will come onto this board and whine on about how the "actress" sucks.
 
point is gemma with "all" her acting/experience is still a dud

the measure of an actor should be based on how well they act and not what their prior career was/is

6 toes eh
i knew she wasn't perfect
 
point is gemma with "all" her acting/experience is still a dud

the measure of an actor should be based on how well they act and not what their prior career was/is

6 toes eh
i knew she wasn't perfect
She was actually born with 6 fingers too but I think had those amputated as a baby. It's a genetic thing.

But maybe I just haven't been paying attention. I found out Denzel Washington has a seriously messed up pinky and it was like, "HOLY CRAP HOW COME I NEVER NOTICED?????" :wow:
 
Honestly, the quality of Huntley's acting isn't going to make or break the movie for me. It was the same thing with Fox for me. I'm in it for the TF's and nothing else.
 
I just see people are gonna complain no matter what? and I can guarantee the same people who said give this chick a chance will come onto this board and whine on about how the "actress" sucks.

you are probably right, but the key is, we will say she is horrible AFTER watching the movie

point is gemma with "all" her acting/experience is still a dud

the measure of an actor should be based on how well they act and not what their prior career was/is

6 toes eh
i knew she wasn't perfect

:up:
people keep refering to fox's "experience". too bad she didn't use any of it for the movie.

Honestly, the quality of Huntley's acting isn't going to make or break the movie for me. It was the same thing with Fox for me. I'm in it for the TF's and nothing else.

exactly. still think it do well regardless
 
Last edited:
Well lets hope the model uses her 'experience' to walk fantastically and pull of this year's hottest fashion.
 
Her clothe will get soaked in something and then through out the rest of the movie have to prance around in her underwear looking for dry clothe.

With her going asking "where are my clothe?" Which will be her catch phrase.:hehe:
 
will smiths rapping experience certainly didn't hamper his early films
 
Will Smith had experience as a tv actor before landing his big role in Bad Boys and Independence Day....just like someone else I know.
 
And you'd look twice at Megan Fox from the first movie?

Megan has never looked nicer than she did in the first movie, she was stunning then but has since ruined herself with surgery.

Or at 90% of the actresses in Hollywood sans makeup, for that matter?

Rosie is at least as attractive as Megan Fox, and more shapely, imo. And she's cheaper :doh: which means that's one more fight scene we'll get to see.

You guys make it sound like Megan Fox is an actual actress.

Sorry, but have seen actresses that look nicer without make-up than this model does with.

It boggles my mind how people find her unattractive. Seriously? ...if she didn't "steal" the role from Megan would she still be so hated?
And its is really funny. It seems like people do think Megan is an actual actress and I've been saying Megan Fox IS on equal footing with your typical VS model. Is she hot? Definitely...but thats about it.

I'm sorry. But Megan Fox isn't a veteran actor compared to ANYBODY. And secondly, where did you see the new girl act to come to that conclusion? And third, does the role of the hot love interest really require any acting ability at all? I don't think so.

I couldnt care less about Megan being dropped, I really couldnt care other than from a story perspective, but if they had gotten someone that improved the love interest role, I would have been a happy camper, as long as they could act.

My main complaint is basically that they dropped Megan and the first announcement was 'We have someone hotter,' which meant from the start of this they werent looking for someone who could act but just a pretty face, and the person they eventually went with is barely even that IMO.

There are any number of good actresses out who are better looking or just as good looking as Fox who can actually act, why not go for one of them?

and no, gemma isn't great but if she was cast i'm sure your arugments would have a differn't structure to them...
hence my point.

a good actor is simply that, a good actor.
a filmography is just a bonus.

They would have a different structure, she is a better actress than Fox so I would be looking forward to her role rather than being apprehensive about it.
 
Will Smith had experience as a tv actor before landing his big role in Bad Boys and Independence Day....just like someone else I know.

well if you consider his time as the fresh prince "acting" I suppose you're right.

the point would then be, his acting gig on tv wasn't hampered by his previous rap career
 
I just see people are gonna complain no matter what? and I can guarantee the same people who said give this chick a chance will come onto this board and whine on about how the "actress" sucks.

Yes. Unless she's actually good. We won't know one way or the other until we actually see the movie.

Stranger things have happened. :yay:
 
Last edited:
it looks like Megan realized that she wont get a big paycheck in 2010. so she decided to go on the beach.............a lot .

;)
 
it looks like Megan realized that she wont get a big paycheck in 2010. so she decided to go on the beach.............a lot .

;)
Its called a vacation. People tend to go on them from time to time.:woot:
 
This girl has been in nothing. Megan Fox has been in movies and tv shows. So yes, she is a veteran compared to somebody that has done absolutely nothing. It just reiterates the fact that this girl was hired for looks, nothing more and nothing less.
So by your logic Megan Fox is a veteran compared to Gabourey Sidibe prior to her oscar-nominated role in Precious. Because she hadn't been in any movies before that.

I think you're a veteran ACTor when you actually ACT. There is a difference between being a movie star and being an actor. I know nowadays they're used interchangeably but there is a difference.

People whined that Megan Fox was not a good actress and they applauded when she was booted out. Go back and look in this thread! They then turn around and hire a model with no acting experience and to see all the open jawed responses in here was hilarious.
I just don't know why people care. The role of the "love interest" is rather pointless anyways...whoever takes that role is just there for eye candy, nothing more.

These movies have a ton of chances to be better but they just piss those chances into the wind.
With Michael Bay? Not really. Maybe when they hire a worthy director. The only reason I'm waiting for Transformers 3 is to see the action scenes...and thats it. I couldn't care less for story, plot,acting etc...its all a futile effort if you ask me. That and hopefully Steve Jablonsky coming back because I loved his Transformers 1 score.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,180
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"