Sometimes I wonder if some guys are so in love with their own dick that they're horrified to see any competition![]()
This is why I love you. :heart:
Sometimes I wonder if some guys are so in love with their own dick that they're horrified to see any competition![]()
I don't find nudity of either sex offensive. I'm a guy, I'm not afraid of "turning gay" because I see someone else of the same sex naked in the locker room or anything like that.
Some guys are just prudes or overly sensitive. I agree that some guys don't like looking at others' wangs because they fear "competition." Ridiculous.
Full frontal male nudity doesn't bother me. It isn't my bread and butter
Dangling, vein-y, purple headed penises are jarring, just as are hairy (or even shaven) moist lipped vaginas. T
Where is my full frontal cutie pie? I ain't seen 'im.![]()
This is so true. I remember hearing all about it with Swordfish, the first time Halle Berry showed her boobs. It wasn't that the movie was good (which it was) it was all about her boobs.![]()
The ladies love Gonzo
Pedo bear alert. All pedophiles must now leave.I am a nude male on occasion.
most nudity in films isn't really necessary to the film. how many times has it actually been integral to the film? i can't think of any at the moment, but suggestions would be good for discussion.
movies with ***** in have more balls.
There are... Heath Ledger in I'm Not There., Christian Bale in American Psycho, Peter Sarsgaard in Kinsey and so on. Mainly it's just independent films where actors are more comfortable stripping down for "art."
But any movie where sex is a crucial plot element or theme (and is R-rated or higher), it's almost a cop-out if there's no nudity at all, regardless if it's from the back or the front. But the most telling example of gratuitous nudity is Love! Valour! Compassion! where it seemed that the director wanted to get away with showing as many wangs as possible and retain an R-rating. The story and content of that film just didn't seem that nudity was necessary for the narrative.
i think some movies just throw nudity in there for now real reason. like Open Water, a movie about sharks, why do we need to see all the nudity in the beginning? i didn't see a point in that.
i've not seen the movies you mentioned, but i can agree that sometimes it does push the impact of the character's and what they go through based on the examples in those films
i think some movies just throw nudity in there for now real reason. like Open Water, a movie about sharks, why do we need to see all the nudity in the beginning? i didn't see a point in that.
i've not seen the movies you mentioned, but i can agree that sometimes it does push the impact of the character's and what they go through based on the examples in those films
You lie to me and tell me the ghostbusters luchbox full of ***** in Superbad didn't serve it's purpose![]()
i think some movies just throw nudity in there for now real reason. like Open Water, a movie about sharks, why do we need to see all the nudity in the beginning? i didn't see a point in that.
i've not seen the movies you mentioned, but i can agree that sometimes it does push the impact of the character's and what they go through based on the examples in those films
Well, obviously--unless there was a horrific accident, the balls are always inheriently behind the dick.![]()
Bale didn't go full-frontal in Psycho--the most he showed was his ass.
*adds to Netflix list*There are... Heath Ledger in I'm Not There., Christian Bale in American Psycho, Peter Sarsgaard in Kinsey and so on. Mainly it's just independent films where actors are more comfortable stripping down for "art."
I saw that Seymore Hoffman dude's ass in some indie film. I had to wash my eyes out. It was scary.I also find it highly coincidental that the actors who are comfortable doing FF nude scenes are mostly from the UK, Europe and Australia. Most American actors only do rear nudity, and those that do show it all are mostly either old fogeys like Harvey Keitel or husky guys like Jason Segel.