xwolverine2
Arkham Assassin
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2004
- Messages
- 36,464
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
not if its done rightXwolverineX said:T4 would only further butcher the once great series.
not if its done rightXwolverineX said:T4 would only further butcher the once great series.
Once again, I think this is the only way to do T4 right. And I'd only want to see it made if it were directed by James Cameron or Spielberg, which will never happen. And of course, I would settle for no other person than Michael Biehn to play Reese.ToddIsDead said:I really think the only way to go with T4 is to have it take place in 2029 and have old John and Reese as the main characters. It would have the resistance hunting down all of the Terminator manufacturing warehouses, and the time-displacement equipment. There should be flashbacks to the beginning of the war and the time that John and Kyle spent in the concentration camps, or it could start in the camps and be about the revolution. It would end with the first T-800 and Kyle being sent back to May 12th, 1984.
The Phantom said:They should start off T4 where T3 left off and have John, Kate, and the T-850 somehow get transported to the future, near the end of the war, where John meets Reese. The humans and Skynet are at a standstill and basically the major bulk of the movie is John becoming the leader he was destined to be and turning the tides of war. The T-850 will have a clone nemesis that he fights at numerous points in the movie. In the end Skynet should be all but defeated and their last ditch effort is to transport the evil T-850 back in time. The T-850's have their climactic battle as the evil one makes an attempt to go back in time. Unfortunately the good T-850 loses and the evil one jumps back in time to kill John's mother. Even though the humans win the war, the evil T-850 has escaped, and Reese volunteers to be sent back in time after him.
Thus we get a satisfactory end and at the same time it connects the movie to the original Terminator.
xwolverine2 said:maybe they will get lazy and just combine the hobbit with T4....
two hobbits travel to skynet
ToddIsDead said:Once again, I think this is the only way to do T4 right. And I'd only want to see it made if it were directed by James Cameron or Spielberg, which will never happen. And of course, I would settle for no other person than Michael Biehn to play Reese.
TheVileOne said:most of those movies sound like crap. The Pink Panther remake was garbage. T3 was pointless. I see no point in a sequel to the remake of the Thomas Crowne Affair either. And that movie came out years ago. No one is going to care about a sequel. Just like the Zorro sequel came way too late.
StarWarsAgent said:Peter jacko? again? no. they got to get someone else for the hobbit movie..I'd say Lucas
I am pumped about T4. can't wait!
StarWarsAgent said:Peter jacko? again? no. they got to get someone else for the hobbit movie..I'd say Lucas
I am pumped about T4. can't wait!
xwolverine2 said:why didnt they make the hobbit before the lotr trilogy?
They may do things very differently but overall quality levels can be roughly equal. If the feel of the Hobbit in even close to LOTR it will be well received by fans.Erzengel said:Can 2 different studios have the same production standards?
Without Jackson many people will stay away. Getting him is probably crucial to the project.Erzengel said:Obviously that article from aintitcool, it seems Jackson isn't even onboard yet.
I don't personally think it will. I like all the books but the Hobbit is nowhere near as epic as LOTR. It may be a lot of people's favourite book but the LOTR books are also many people's favourite set of books. As long as the quality and consistency (where possible) is there, most LOTR fans will watch The Hobbit even if only as some sort of 'DVD extra' to LOTR. If made well, it should be a great film in its own right.Erzengel said:Thirdly, obviously the Hobbit book is some people's favorites. But without the same characters, will it be as wildly embraced as the LOTR trilogy?
Boom said:If they don't get Jackson and WETA, I'm honestly not interested.
StarWarsAgent said:Peter jacko? again? no. they got to get someone else for the hobbit movie..I'd say Lucas
Erzengel said:Secondly, I just think MGM would be so desperate for the Hobbit to be good that they'd want to have heavy studio involvement.
I'm 96% sure he's joking.PowersOfMind said:Oh hell no! Lucas shouldnt even be allowed to touch The Hobbit.
Iceman/Psylocke said:I'm 96% sure he's joking.