All I can say is "if you look for something, you will find it" to that negative critique of the show and it's female cast. It was more about her disliking the female characters for being shallow (a hint, none of the male characters were exactly upholding a high standard) but like I said, she seemed to have a bone to pick exclusively with the easiest one to get readers to look at her article.
I've only seen the first episode, not the second yet (probably tonight) but I thought it was decent and I can easily pick apart her claims of sexism.
Using her example, Fox liked the woman being shorter than him, for being shorter, not because she was female; he'd have quipped just the same line had she been a male segement producer. Despite the outrage, gender had zero to do with that.
It's unheard of territory as far as handling someone with an obvious condition like this (Parkinson's). I can't think of any other series that so prominently used the illness of the main star (or even co-stars) as a basis for the character yet her main focus is the female characters, not the main character who you would expect to be the object of critique for daring to make use of Parkinson's for gags. Her other critiques are easy to dismiss too; remove the gender, replace them with a male counterpart, same result in most cases.
It just so happened some were female therefore it must be sexist, while ignoring anything that happened with male characters (I'd have to rewatch the show to point out all her ignored problems in the male characters but they were there).
About the only valid critique she may have is the daughter, who is more playing a teenage stereotype than a female one and the sister Leigh, who could be seen as a sexist example.
My biggest gripe with her complaints is ironically the most stupid: "Even his wife Annie seems to exist to support her husband, even though she's a teacher herself." Yes, because a man with Parkinson's is expected to be a man and support himself with absolutely no help from anyone else. He doesn't need anyone to assist him at all.
I can find sexist remarks myself if I just look hard enough. Or in that case, just read her article.
It's a flawed show of course but she is tearing into a comedy series because it uses it's main character's disability for laughs (that reviewer must have been appalled they would dare do that in a comedy with the main star who suffers from it fully supporting it, had she not been distracted with all the sexism) but it isn't the awfulness she is depicting.
I'm sure someone will come along and exaggeratedly declare this misogynist all because it dares refutes a woman's rather poor attempt to garner page reads but I really think she missed the mark. If she wants to find something truly sexist on TV then there are more obvious marks but Michael J. Fox's return to television with Parkinson's was too easy a target for her to blast with sexist claims to garner attention.