Milk Tray Guy
70s Man of Action
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2017
- Messages
- 19,920
- Reaction score
- 10,490
- Points
- 103

Absolutely!The reports specifically said it would be the Batman from the Burtonverse. Also, I’ll be completely shocked if he doesn’t appear in costume in this since I’m sure they want to sell a ton of merchandise.
... the DCEU has already established the existence of the multiverse, of which every DC live-action TV show and movie ever made is a part.
What that means is the DCEU already has a continuity that allows for multiple iterations of the same character. That means Keaton's, Ben Affleck's, and Robert Pattinson's Batman all technically exist in the same massive, multiversal reality, and can cross over into each other's world.
I wanted that so much.I really wanted to see the JDM Thomas Wayne Batman facing his warped wife The Joker.
God, I so wanna see Keaton flirting with GadotJust thinking of Veteran Bruce sonning Cavill's Superman or Momoa's Aquaman and flirting with Wonder Woman kinda puts a smile on my face. Please please please bring back Pfeiffer even as just a cameo.
And yes, bring back Pfeiffer! 
I'd rather they do Batman Beyond as well but the whole turning Batman into a legacy character gets people's knickers in a twist seemingly. Plus, the clone angle isn't my favorite thing.I'd rather an actual Batman Beyond who could also serve as a Batman for the Justice League going forward. Make it Tim Drake even if you have to but save Batgirl and Grayson for the Matt Reeves movies.
I could see Burton's Batman being very much like Kingdom Come Bruce in his old age. Even down to having Bat drones patrolling the city. To be honest I'd have rather have had Affleck's version continue in Justice League movies after the Snyder cut. Even if recast with Jon Hamm or whoever. Because I cannot see Pattinson's Batman fitting into that role at all and prefer he stays in his own bubble.
I really wanted to see the JDM Thomas Wayne Batman facing his warped wife The Joker. A big chunk of my posts on this site are about my love and admiration for Keaton's Batman so I'll roll with it. But this is definitely pandering at the same time I've ALWAYS been for the multiverse on the big screen so I can't be a hypocrite. Just thinking of Veteran Bruce sonning Cavill's Superman or Momoa's Aquaman and flirting with Wonder Woman kinda puts a smile on my face. Please please please bring back Pfeiffer even as just a cameo.
Should Michael Keaton really be returning to the role of Gotham’s dark knight, 30 years on from originating the role for the modern era in 1989’s Batman and its 1992 sequel Batman Returns? If a new report from the Wrap is to be believed, this is the question the 68-year-old Oscar nominee might currently be pondering over his morning coffee. The Hollywood trade site reports he is in line to reprise his famous role in The Flash, a forthcoming solo outing for Ezra Miller’s take on the scarlet speedster.
This seems, at first glance, like the kind of desperate late career move Hollywood agents have nightmares about. Ageing star pulls on the famous old costume once again, only to find himself negatively compared to his own younger, more virile self from three decades in the past. Squint a little, and it could even be a cheeky alternative ending to Alejandro G Iñárritu’s Birdman, which featured Keaton as a has-been star of superhero movies whose inner voice wants him to ditch his current oh-so-serious play in favour of another avian outing.
Fortunately for Keaton, the headline rarely tells the full story, and there is significant evidence that he has not taken leave of his senses after all. Rather than playing Batman again, he will be playing just one of many caped crusaders that have existed across a potentially infinite array of realities – it just happens to be that this particular crusader is the one we met in Tim Burton’s films.
That’s because Flashpoint, the comic book source material for the proposed new film, sees Barry Allen’s Flash plunged into an alternate reality where DC’s costumed titans have changed radically. Aquaman, Wonder Woman and their respective tribes, for instance, are in the midst of all-out global war, while Superman is a freaky-deaky weakling.
I can’t help thinking that DC has missed a trick somewhere. In the comic (warning, spoilers ahead!), one of the alternate reality’s revelations is that the dark knight patrolling the streets of Gotham is not Bruce Wayne at all, but his grizzled father Thomas. (Wait till you see who the Joker is …)
In this version of reality, young Bruce – not his parents – died on the fateful night in the alley that inspired Batman into existence. It is the guilt-racked father – a sort of Eastwood-esque avenger – who swoops down on criminals night after night.
If the Wrap is to be believed, Warner Bros seems to have swapped out this plot element in favour of bringing back Keaton as an older version of the caped crusader, with the storyline filling us in on what has been happening to him in the intervening years. That’s a tantalising prospect, if only because we get to imagine that George Clooney, Val Kilmer and Ben Affleck never got to pull on the cape and cowl (though Christian Bale may have some reason to feel a little hard done by). Moreover, it will be fascinating to see if the studio can finally work out how to craft a costume for Keaton that actually allows him to turn his head.
And yet one of the comic’s greatest moments of pathos involves the final sacrifice made by Thomas Wayne that allows The Flash to return to his own reality and restore Bruce Wayne to the role of Batman. It is such an essential part of Flashpoint; the studio will need to have some pretty impressive ideas up its sleeve to match it.
Perhaps we can start a campaign for Keaton to appear as the grizzled elder Wayne, the toughest, wrinkliest dark knight since time began. But even if he doesn’t get the chance, the prospect of appearing in The Flash seems like a win-win. For this is the wonderful thing about alternate realities: if the movie’s great, Keaton gets to play Batman one last time. If the movie’s terrible, who knows if this version of the caped crusader really was the one we last saw three decades ago?
Yes, really keen to see how that plays out. I was thinking that maybe Keaton's Batman has lost his way - maybe after the death of Alfred - and become more extreme, like Thomas in Flashpoint. But then I thought that's a bit too close to what we had with Affleck in BvS.No Thomas Wayne Batman at all apparently.
I'd rather an actual Batman Beyond who could also serve as a Batman for the Justice League going forward. Make it Tim Drake even if you have to but save Batgirl and Grayson for the Matt Reeves movies.
I could see Burton's Batman being very much like Kingdom Come Bruce in his old age. Even down to having Bat drones patrolling the city. To be honest I'd have rather have had Affleck's version continue in Justice League movies after the Snyder cut. Even if recast with Jon Hamm or whoever. Because I cannot see Pattinson's Batman fitting into that role at all and prefer he stays in his own bubble.
I really wanted to see the JDM Thomas Wayne Batman facing his warped wife The Joker. A big chunk of my posts on this site are about my love and admiration for Keaton's Batman so I'll roll with it. But this is definitely pandering at the same time I've ALWAYS been for the multiverse on the big screen so I can't be a hypocrite. Just thinking of Veteran Bruce sonning Cavill's Superman or Momoa's Aquaman and flirting with Wonder Woman kinda puts a smile on my face. Please please please bring back Pfeiffer even as just a cameo.
You pretty much laid out what I would want. Although, I would like the futuristic bent of Beyond but I'm also fine with not being futuristic as well. I just like the idea of old Bruce Wayne training a new Bat more than anything, be it man, girl, or woman. I just think not doing a new Batman has advantages because you avoid the complaining that comes along with replacing Bruce in the suit and passing on the title of Batman.I like the idea of revisiting the Burton verse and Keaton is such a charismatic actor - he will be able to hold the scenes he is in.
I really hope he is Bruce, in the cave, guiding a younger bat.... technology is such that he has drones, cameras and a greater eye on the city's streets.. I don't want it hitech.... but grubby camera's around the city that look harmless, Wayne tech providing businesses in the slums with security, it all links back to the bat cave. I have blade runner vibes in terms of how the city looks 30 years later.
Behind him is his old suit, modified naturally over the years, but hung up, none the less. I want the young bat to wear his cowl and emblem, modern materials of course.
I also feel like a situation occurs where he has to suit up one last time, to go in and help, either rescue or assist the young bat... wether it's a he or she, i'm cool either way.
Like imagine them stuck in arkam and radioing for help then the line goes dead... think of the movie 'taken' or 'Rambo last blood', could be totally cool...
Then, I like to know how this Bruce then kinda takes up the mantle after batfleck. Batfleck is the dice batman, do we just ignore batfleck and not focus on him?
I kinda want one coherent time line, that's my only issue.
