• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Mom Chews On Infant's Brain: 'I didn't mean to do it!'

Thank you. :up:

I completely she should be confined to a mental facility for the rest of her life, but people here are calling for her execution. It's ridiculous.

Agreed.

Anyone can say they had depression or was mentally ill and use it as an alibi. Did she have verifiable proof from doctors or what?

The article said she'd been hospitalized previously and recently.

Well yea exactly.

So I could go on some killing rampage and bath in my victims intestines and then when I get arrested I could just go "Hey man, the devil's in my mind told me to do it!"?

And the old bill would be like "Ok son, we'll get you off to the funny farm ASAP. Don't worry, everything will be all right :D"

IF she gets "off" on a plea of insanity it won't be easy, not everyone can just claim insanity she'll actually need to prove it.

It's not her fault,( she's crazy) but she does need to be locked up forever, because I don't know if even a million years of therapy can cure this sick little ****ing cannibal ****-head baby****ing ****-headed little ****ing *****.

I've never seen you curse until now. I'm strangely happy and sad. It's like the padawan out learned the master.

Lets chew on its brain. :o

In all seriousness yea this is pretty f**ked, but what isn't nowadays.

Good one.
 
I've never seen you curse until now. I'm strangely happy and sad. It's like the padawan out learned the master.
I try not too, but I felt my feelings couldn't be expressed without cursing.
 
I try not too, but I felt my feelings couldn't be expressed without cursing.

When you only do it when it means something it means that much more.

Me? I have to invent new curse words to make my passionate statements like:

"What the fudgenapper?"

Doesn't it sound bad?
 
Otty Sanchez, who police say told them the devil made her kill and mutilate her only child

Wow...Like to hear how ''the devil'' made her do it...*rolls eyes*
 
Where's that damn sick and disturbing thread. This inhumane-osity-ness belongs in there.
 
She already tried to kill herself. Being forced to live is probably a fate worse than death.

Once she's medicated she'll realize what she did and have to think about it every day.
 
and there's nothing is wrong with two schizophrenics raising a baby. Just as long as they stay medicated.
 
and there's nothing is wrong with two schizophrenics raising a baby. Just as long as they stay medicated.

:dry:

I'm sorry, but that should be a prohibiting factor when it comes to raising a child - there's far too much at stake in such a situation.

Besides, even with medication you need regular therapy to keep your mind in reality (this goes for just about every recurring psychological issue).
 
and there's nothing is wrong with two schizophrenics raising a baby. Just as long as they stay medicated.

Once you start putting qualifiers on this, you start to see that, yes, there is a problem with two schizophrenics raising a baby.
 
OMFG i worked with the crazy $%^#( seriously she was a floater tech for the pharmacy chain i work for.
 
Once you start putting qualifiers on this, you start to see that, yes, there is a problem with two schizophrenics raising a baby.
Well the same goes for two alcoholics who must stay sober. Most parents have qualifiers due to some personal flaw.

Are you suggesting it should be illegal for two people with schizophrenia to raise a child? How Orwellian.
 
:dry:

I'm sorry, but that should be a prohibiting factor when it comes to raising a child - there's far too much at stake in such a situation.

Besides, even with medication you need regular therapy to keep your mind in reality (this goes for just about every recurring psychological issue).
Unless you have a source I'm going to call bull on that one. Once you alter the brain chemistry via psychotropic drugs there's no reason for a person to have delusions.

and no parent is perfect. If medicated schizophrenics have the capacity to be good parents then how can you forbid all of them from raising children based on the actions of a few un-medicated schizophrenics. If a person is a law-abiding citizen and takes their medication why would you take away their right to raise a family?
 
and there's nothing is wrong with two schizophrenics raising a baby. Just as long as they stay medicated.

There's a difference between a mild schizophrenic and a schizophrenic that eats their child's brain. If a woman is "far gone" enough to eat bits of her baby she is too far gone to be trusted to take her medications regularly.
 
Unless you have a source I'm going to call bull on that one. Once you alter the brain chemistry via psychotropic drugs there's no reason for a person to have delusions.

and no parent is perfect. If medicated schizophrenics have the capacity to be good parents then how can you forbid all of them from raising children based on the actions of a few un-medicated schizophrenics. If a person is a law-abiding citizen and takes their medication why would you take away their right to raise a family?

Raising a family isn't necessarily a "right" as much as it is a freedom by default. If a parent is unfit for whatever reason then the state has the responsibility to protect it's citizens (in this case the child).
 
And what if that person "forgets" to take their meds? Shall we let them slide because they eat their baby's head?
 
Raising a family isn't necessarily a "right" as much as it is a freedom by default. If a parent is unfit for whatever reason then the state has the responsibility to protect it's citizens (in this case the child).
If a person is taking their meds there is no reason to take away their kids. They are doing everything they can to be responsible parents.
 
And what if that person "forgets" to take their meds? Shall we let them slide because they eat their baby's head?
So you punish 99% of responsible schizophrenic parents for the 1% freak accidents?

Why not prohibit 99% of the general population based on what 1% does being that the general population has it's fair share of child abusers.
 
If a person is taking their meds there is no reason to take away their kids. They are doing everything they can to be responsible parents.

So you punish 99% of responsible schizophrenic parents for the 1% freak accidents?

Why not prohibit 99% of the general population based on what 1% does being that the general population has it's fair share of child abusers.

Fair point. I still support social services having continued enolvement with these families and only removing the child when necessary.

Something tells me that this was not her first outburst. In fact I think the article mentioned that earlier in that day she was very unstable but calmed down. If social services had more contact they could pick up on the need to remove the child. Sometimes doing everything you can simply isn't always good enough.
 
Raising a family isn't necessarily a "right" as much as it is a freedom by default. If a parent is unfit for whatever reason then the state has the responsibility to protect it's citizens (in this case the child).
There has to be a precedent for one to be considered unfit. You can't just take away someone's kid because of what they could be capable of theoretically if they were off of meds when they have had no history of skipping meds while being a parent.
 
There has to be a precedent for one to be considered unfit. You can't just take away someone's kid because of what they could be capable of theoretically if they were off of meds when they have had no history of skipping meds while being a parent.

I agree.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,432
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"