To go back to the opriginal question, I dont think the first MK warrants a reboot. Its way too early plus fx and story didnt date much, if at all. Not that its some great movie, but for what it is it does it job very well. So I would prefer MK3 instead of a reboot
And besides, do you really want a sequel to Annihilation?
lambert was best , reamr would better fit fujin, ask most people on the midway boards who was the better mk movie raiden,They should just get James Remar again. Everyone knows he was the best Raiden.
lambert was best , reamr would better fit fujin, ask most people on the midway boards who was the better mk movie raiden,
Do you even know anything about this franchise. :facepalmLiam Neislon as Scorpion and Jackie Chan as Kaung.
Why not? Just because it's a sequel doesn't mean it has to be a piece of crap like Annihilation was. They could easily continue with the same characters while basically avoiding the mess that was Annihilation.
I personally think a reboot is a crappy idea because MK1 is fine the way it is. Yeah, the effects are a little dated, but is that really reason enough to remake it? Other than the effects the movie is a damn good adaptation of the game, even if you disagree with some of the creative liberties they took. It's still one of, if not the best videogame adaptations ever.
That's why I think either a prequel with new characters or a sequel is a better way to go.
A sequel is a bad idea, simply because we'd have to get all the actors back and also the original wasn't that great to begin with, anyway; a reboot is much better and with a fresh start it can maybe avoid some of the pitfalls from the previous 2 installments.