Movie title confusion

Timstuff

Avenger
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
19,914
Reaction score
2
Points
31
Has anyone else noticed that there are a lot of movies coming out recently that have confusingly similar titles?

Up, an animated Pixar film, and Up in the Air, a live action comedy
9, an animated adventure movie, and Nine, a musical
Avatar, a science fiction movie by James cameron, and The Last Airbender, a fantasy film based on the popular cartoon "Avatar: The Last Airbender"

I think it might be particularly troublesome for Avatar, because 90% of the people I talk to know that "Avatar" is coming out when I ask them about it, but they always assume I'm talking about "The Last Airbender." When I prod them about "that movie with the blue people" I can sometimes get the gears to turn, but there's definitely confusion about which is which.

Can anyone else thing of any more examples? And do you think that cross-brand confusion amongst audiences could potentially hurt the bottom line for some movies?
 
Up and 9 are good examples.

in december any Avatar confusion will end.
 
Also the movie Precious was originally gonna be called Push, but there was some movie with that name that came out earlier this year.
 
And it was a movie I happened to think was pretty awesome. :up:
 
Also the movie Precious was originally gonna be called Push, but there was some movie with that name that came out earlier this year.

Yeah, the novel it's based on is titled Push. And I think that's why all the early promotion kept referring to it as "Push: Based on a Novel By Sapphire", until they probably just figured it'd be easier to just completely rename it.
 
Ugh explaining to people that camerons movie is not the last airbender is getting old
 
I think his video was on chronological confusion, like "Final Destination" and "The Final Destination," or "The Fast and the Furious" and "Fast and Furious." In a way that's even dumber since one studio actually chose to cause the confusion within one franchise, even though they didn't have to.
 
There was a movie with Goldie Hawn in which she teaches football called Wildcats which might mislead comic readers into thinking it's the Jim Lee comic Wildcats.
 
There was a movie with Goldie Hawn in which she teaches football called Wildcats which might mislead comic readers into thinking it's the Jim Lee comic Wildcats.

Only the reeeeallly, reeeaaallly slow ones.
 
Here's hoping todays youth think Kubrick's 2001 is a prequel to Emmerich's 2012. If only so I can witness first hand the only time mass genocide will be excusable.
 
The Hulk and The Incredible Hulk
Alien and Aliens
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
 
The Haunting (THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE)

The House on Haunted Hill
 
The Hulk and The Incredible Hulk
Alien and Aliens
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

i don't know about these. they're either sequels or remakes but nevertheless still related, unlike '9' and 'Nine'.
 
The short film from Pixar called... "Partly Cloudy" (u can find it on the UP DVD)

I think theres another animated film somewhere very recently with the same title
 
I think his video was on chronological confusion, like "Final Destination" and "The Final Destination," or "The Fast and the Furious" and "Fast and Furious." In a way that's even dumber since one studio actually chose to cause the confusion within one franchise, even though they didn't have to.

It's deliberate. It's made to make the audience feel that they are seeing more of the same series, like a TV show.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"