About Muslims being barbaric or aggressive fanatics, there is this HUGE misconception (it's actually a myth) that Muslims are more accepting of killing innocent civilians especially here in the civilized west, where the death of innocents civilians is considered "collateral damage."
There was a study done by the University of Maryland's Program on International Public Attitudes. It asked, "bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians" are "
never justified."
In Indonesia, 74% of the people polled said it was never justified.
In Pakistan,
86% agreed that it was never justified. That's important because the second the attack happened Pakistan was blamed, even though the very day before peace talks with India and Pakistan were VERY VERY promising. And Pakistani militants could be behind this but they don't speak for the majority of the populous.
Bangladesh, 81%.
When Americans were asked, only 46% agreed.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0223/p09s01-coop.html
As for Churches in Saudi Arabia, Osama Bid Laden considers the royal family oppressive. So, there's that.
The whole "they're barbarians" thing is a little lame. Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin, Slobodan Milosevic, Mao, Charles Taylor, Robert Mugabee...I could go on with this...these people weren't Muslims, but I don't hold Catholicism, or atheists, or Christians responsible.
Bin Laden was a CIA tactician. So was Saddam. Taliban helped us stop the Reds. Saudi rulers and the Shah gave us oil for cheap. This bid for cheap oil and imperialistic greed is not the fault of Muslims. We can't wait til the grounds all dried up.
I can understand anger and frustration, but ignorance in the face of hate and intolerance isn't going to solve anything.