well he didn't do a very good job of helping him if he still ended up with Styker
It does matter when they made a point of saving him in the previous movie.In the long run there was a 10 year gap inbetween DOFP and Apocalypse so it doesn't really matter.
It does matter when they made a point of saving him in the previous movie.
Excusing bad writing and bad continuity.
It does matter when they made a point of saving him in the previous movie.
Excusing bad writing and bad continuity.
In the long run there was a 10 year gap inbetween DOFP and Apocalypse so it doesn't really matter.
It's weird that you invoke the 10 year gap for this but when this same reasoning is used for other potential events, you cry foul.
I meant Caliban not herShe technically was saving him from drowning, not really from Stryker.
Its weird how people have always assumed stryker got wolverine against his will by either having someone take him to stryker or by capturing him but in X2 it was stated wolverine volunteered and thats why origins had to find a reason to have Logan volunteer.
In the long run there was a 10 year gap inbetween DOFP and Apocalypse so it doesn't really matter.
Well there is desire and there is common sense.
You can use the 10 year excuse for anything but sometimes quicksilver will sit in his mums basement for 10 years and sometimes a character will move on to other things, it just depends on the probability.
You mean Stryker right?Idk why people are having a hard time with the Mystique/Wolverine thing. She did say that she's brought people to Caliban before. She even said in that scene that she just rescues them/brings them to Caliban and then they're free to do what they want. That's what she originally planned for Nightcrawler before asking him to take her to Charles.
So at the end of DOFP, she rescued Logan and set him free. Just like she did with Alex, Toad, and the others. Remember that we last see Toad working in a kitchen. I'll also remind everyone that in the scene where Mystique attempts to assassinate Trask and is captured on video, just before Trask runs out the room, he looks and pauses directly at a confused Logan's bone claws.
Do why is it hard to believe that Mystique rescued Logan and Logan went on about his business? His past self had no idea who Trask was. His future consciousness, which went back to the changed future did. Trask already had an interest in past Logan and either captured him or convinced him to join Weapon X. Past Logan had no idea what kind of person Trask was and therefore didn't take precautions to stay away from him.
IDK why people are saying it doesn't make sense or that Mystique gave Logan to Trask.
Idk why people are having a hard time with the Mystique/Wolverine thing. She did say that she's brought people to Caliban before. She even said in that scene that she just rescues them/brings them to Caliban and then they're free to do what they want. That's what she originally planned for Nightcrawler before asking him to take her to Charles.
So at the end of DOFP, she rescued Logan and set him free. Just like she did with Alex, Toad, and the others. Remember that we last see Toad working in a kitchen. I'll also remind everyone that in the scene where Mystique attempts to assassinate Trask and is captured on video, just before Trask runs out the room, he looks and pauses directly at a confused Logan's bone claws.
Do why is it hard to believe that Mystique rescued Logan and Logan went on about his business? His past self had no idea who Trask was. His future consciousness, which went back to the changed future did. Trask already had an interest in past Logan and either captured him or convinced him to join Weapon X. Past Logan had no idea what kind of person Trask was and therefore didn't take precautions to stay away from him.
IDK why people are saying it doesn't make sense or that Mystique gave Logan to Trask.
Is this desire on your part or is this (lack of) common sense?
You mean Stryker right?
Because it makes the whole end sequence of DOFP utterly pointless.
Right back at ya.
They said themselves that some things are different while some are the same. You can still arrive at the samepoint yet take different paths to get to that same point. He could have ended up with Stryker a completely different way the second time than he did the first. But he was always destined to end up with him.
Common sense says if an actor (or actress) tells you in so many different ways that she doesn't want to be there, you don't write your scripts with said actress in mind.
And with the domestic box office for Apocalypse barely registering, does throwing more money into the problem (ie. giving JLaw more money to renew her contract just so she can put her foot down that she doesn't want to wear that make up) make sense?
Common sense says if they thought this was in any way problematic they wouldn't have written the ending of apocalypse how they did
Does alot of things about this franchise make sense? you have complained about it enough times so you tell me?
You're kidding right? With the many continuity problems in this franchise, it's easy to conclude that many of the things that happen in one movie were never planned for the next movie.
Your Logic: I know a lot of things don't make sense, but don't complain!