Crazy Quilt - I'm with you all the way, man. I applaud you for bringing this serious issue to the attention of the Politics board. This is exactly the kind of serious, consequential topic that is generally ignored by the corporate press in favour of mindless election horserace coverage. As a result, most people don't even know the NDAA passed.
Of course, you have to give credit to Obama for taking his typical cowardice to a new low. Signing the bill on New Year's Eve...very sly. And of course, even though he says he has "reservations" about codifying the right to indefinitely lock people up without charges, he signs it anyway. Now that's leadership.
You have to love historical naivety. "We just aren't like them...it just cannot happen here..."
What about the comparison is not valid? The comparison is being made on the point of passing legislation to "legally" take away basic civil liberties akin to what the NDSAP did in Germany with the Enabling Acts. On the point in which the comparison is being made, it is a totally valid comparison.
Why is it any different for the U.S. government to take away these basic freedoms by legislation? How can we trust them to not brutalize people by using these new powers like the Nazis did in Germany(or the Stalinists did in the Soviet Union by 'disappearing' people)? The only argument is because "it's us". Not. Valid. Logic.
End of.
Everything you said is absolutely correct. People don't want to believe that the kind of stuff that happened in history's most infamous totalitarian dictatorships can happen here, even when it is.
The reality we live in is that the U.S. president has claimed the right to imprison or
kill anyone in the world without charges or trial. He started a damn war without getting approval from Congress (even Bush at least got that authorization). America "disappears" people all the time; there are CIA black sites all over the world. People are abducted and sent there for years to be tortured without ever seeing a lawyer. Torture has also been thoroughly documented in Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib.
This is exactly what people think of when they think of an authoritarian dictatorship! Torture. Concentration camps. Imprisoning people for political reasons. Autocratic power grabs. Thanks to the Bush-Obama tag team, the president now claims the power to do pretty much anything.
And yet people won't wake up. They won't believe it for exactly the reasons you outlined - because while the Nazis were Evil and Wicked, Americans are naturally Good and believe in Freedom and Democracy. Just like Nixon said "it's not illegal if the president does it", too many Americans today say "it can't be totalitarian if America is doing it."
Credit the myth of the free press. People believe the media is a free-for-all where any independent voice can make itself heard. They forget that a small number of corporations control everything we see and hear, and they have specific interests. The "free press" is anything but.
This article goes into more detail:
Propagandized America
When Americans think of propagandized people they think of the now defunct Soviet Union or Nazi Germany or perhaps a banana republic dictatorship of the sort supported by their government. Very few of them would think of themselves as being under the sway of a government and corporations who work hand in glove to tell outright falsehoods or hide important information that is inconvenient for them.
In this country, not only are we victims of a government intent upon keeping us misinformed or silent in the face of its wrong doing, but they work hand in hand with a media almost entirely owned by corporations. The interests of the people are rarely in sync with the interests of these corporations, and the result are media which work with the government which consciously works to misdirect our attention or have us believe outright lies.
[...]
Government sources say, are the buzz words for falsehoods told in the name of the state. So-called prestigious publications will print the most outrageous information without attribution, investigation or proof of very serious charges. The Washington Post prints a story, quoting an anonymous source, claiming that Gaddafis Libya not only was in possession of a mustard gas stockpile, but also that it was supplied by Iran.
When Israel and/or the United States attack Iran none of the highly paid anchor men or women or reporters who have access to the administration will stray far from the official party line. That is why one president is as dangerous as any other. The system rewarded the liars who drove America to war against Iraq. The anti-Iranian warmongers will probably fare equally well.
The court scribes who tell us that a statistical blip is proof of economic recovery or that the president had no choice but to accept the Satan sandwich budget deal are no better than propagandists in dictatorial states. The press corps in Libya, who actively assisted NATO in destroying that nation, committed international war crimes in the process. They will never reveal their own evil doing nor will they be called to account by a public that doesnt even realize the magnitude of their crimes.
Anyone who is resistant to the notion that this country is awash in propaganda need look no further than the case of Anwar al-Awlaki. The president ordered the killing of an American citizen who was never charged with a crime. He then directed his minions to reveal to the New York Times the existence of a secret, extra legal memo which justifies his actions. The Times no doubt celebrated their role as court favorites and ignored the role that a newspaper ought to play in reporting a story that should have resulted in a presidential impeachment.
Americans love to say that they live in the greatest country in the world. Such a nation will be hard pressed to admit that they can trust little of the information they get. The nexus of a corrupt governmental structure and a corporate media results in nonsense on a good day and disinformation on a bad one. Our country is not great, it is just powerful and very, very dangerous.