Horrorfan
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 5,112
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
It is for FUN! It defnetly would have been neat to fly a plane in the original Liberty City. If there are helicopters in the game, whats the big deal about throwing a plane or 2? It doesnt have to be a big part of it or a mission but a secret, unlockable or extra would be a good additionAirplanes don't really fit in the context of the game though. With a state like San Andreas, sure...but what is the point of flying an airplane around New York City? If it were done realistically, you would be at the end of the map in five seconds.
People, it's LIBERTY city.
I will bet any of you cash money if you still don't believe it.
It's Liberty City designed to look EXACTLY like New York City.
Yes...because it was meant to be a fictional NY in the first place. I don't see what you are trying to say?
That's why people are calling it New York City. It has the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building. SO who cares if people call it NY instead of Liberty.
Because it's NOT New York?
That's like saying Sera's capital from Gears of War is London because it's based on the architecture. Because it's based on somewhere, that doesn't mean it is that place, no matter how similar.
Close, but not quite. The game is accurately remodeled after NY, so to a degree it is NY, just they aren't gonna call it that. Also Gears might have been 'based' on London's architecture but it didn't actually remodel it, GTA IV is remodeling NY and calling it Liberty City.
Liberty City is a fictional city based on a real one, much like Gotham City and Metropolis are based on real cities. It's NOT new york, even though it's as close as you can get a fictional city.
it makes no sense though why there are no bikes. I could understand planes, but no bikes in a city modeled after NYC?and SA was a huge step back in terms of story line and substance. I'll sacrifice some of SA's cosmetic improvements for a return to classic GTA.
and SA was a huge step back in terms of story line and substance. I'll sacrifice some of SA's cosmetic improvements for a return to classic GTA.
it makes no sense though why there are no bikes. I could understand planes, but no bikes in a city modeled after NYC?
How so? The other characters and plots were basically rip offs from gangster movies, and were cliched and pretty one dimensional- CJ had different sides to him, and really only wanted the best for his neighbourhood.
CJ was a horrible character and the plots were pretty much ripped off from Boyz in da Hood type movies.
.
I smell microtransactions via DLC. I wonder how much they will chargeI agree. You can't walk through NYC without seeing a bike messenger or a delivery guy on a bike, or just people riding them through central park. It is either they want to save some add-ons for future installments or laziness.
Who cares? srsly...http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?act=ST&f=225&t=276329&st=0#entry4208102
Loads of scans from a PS magazine with lots of new info. My interest level is dropping...no bikes, jet packs, varied landscapes, can't work out or customise your character's physique...basically, a huge step back from san andreas.