so which green lantern is it
if there going to make a Green Lantern movie im 100% shure they will go with Hal .. its Hal most people recognize as Green Lantern, and he is THE Green Lantern.. the other guys are just standinns and token black/young guys
No, most of the GA think John Stewart when they think Green Lantern.
Thank you Dini/Timm![]()
Actually John Stuart was created specifically because he was black. He was the defintion of a token character who was created specifically to be a minority.I will not expand it. I have several lengthy posts that deal with this very same fallacy, in this same therad, I believe.
I will state the obvious, to underline how dumb this jab is. The good part is obviously what happens to John's personal life when he gets the ring... y'know, it gets totally shot to heck. Same with Hal, the interesting part isn't why he got the ring, it's what he does with it, and what it does to him.
A lot of people like to forget there was specific reason why John Stewart was selected... and it wasn't because he's black.
I said, "Y'know, Julie... we really oughta... well if something happened to Green Lantern you'd need somebody else. How about we have another Green Lantern?" And Julie says, "What are you driving at? We already have one." I said, "What? We have one?" Julie says, "Yeah, Guy Gardner." I say, "Oh. Really? I didn't know that." He said, "Yeah. We did a story. Don't you read these books?" I said, "Oh sorry. I guess not. Tell me about him." Julie says, "Well, he's a gym teacher." I said, "Is he white?" "Yeah." It was like - what kind of stupid question is that? And he pulled out a comic book and he was white and blonde and I said, "Well let's say something happened to him and Green Lantern needed another guy. Kind of a runner up. Y'know, I'd kind of like to do something like that." I didn't want to lose this idea. I kind of liked the idea and Julie had ruined it for me. He said, "What are you driving at?" I said, "I'd kinda like a black Green Lantern." Julie said, "Why? No!" I said, "Why not?" He said, "Well... no! I mean, why? I mean, you don't think of Green Lantern as being black!" I said, "Now wait a second Julie. Let's try this line of reasoning. Guy comes to Earth. He's going to die. He sends out his ring or his lantern or whatever to find the most worthy person on Earth. Okay? Turns out to be a white Anglo-Saxon test pilot. I could buy that. Y'know, it's possible. It's possible. I buy it. Ring goes out again to find the next guy. It turns out to be a white blonde Anglo-Saxon gym teacher. I don't think so. You know how many Chinese people there are in the world? You ever watch the Olympics? I mean, you rarely ever see three white guys lined up there. You see some once in a while. You know, maybe it happens. Maybe in archery. But you got black guys, you got oriental. I mean, I don't mind if he's oriental but I'd kinda like to have a black guy."
Sam: Well with the race problems at that time it would have made good storytelling.
Neal: Yes! Of course! What am I thinking of? Julie says, "Nawwww." I say, "Julie. C'mon." He says, "Alright. Denny writes it. You gotta draw it." "Okay. You got it. No problem." So Denny hands in the strip and on the first page it says, "Lincoln Washington is walking down the street," and I run into Julie and I go, "Julie. I think we oughta change his name."
Sam: Lincoln Washington?
Neal: Lincoln Washington. [chuckles] Julie says, "Why? I've heard a lot of black names. Lincoln Washington is a good black name!"
Sam: Well you might as well have him eating fried chicken and watermelon in the panel with that name.
Neal: I say, "Well Julie. That's what you call a slave name. You call that a slave name and even if you're called Lincoln Washington that's a name you want to change." "There's nothing wrong with that name," he says, "It's a proud name." I say, "I don't think that's what we want to do with our character. I think you want to call him by a regular name like John Stewart." "John Stewart?" "Yeah. It's a regular name." Julie says, "Fine. Okay. No problem. You got it. Anything else?" I said, "No, that'll be fine." And so we did it. Now in a way, Denny was right. Lincoln Washington is truly a black name because it is a slave name and at that time we still hadn't come up with the Muhammad Ali's and that stuff which would have been even better, but nobody had done it yet so that wasn't the time. But John Stewart, I thought that was pretty good. Who knew that it would end up being a good comedian from a late night television show? So anyways, that was it.
No because MOST people don't watch cartoons....it seems MOST comic fans forget this. Most people would probably remember him being white if anything.No, most of the GA think John Stewart when they think Green Lantern.
Thank you Dini/Timm![]()
No, most of the GA think John Stewart when they think Green Lantern.
Thank you Dini/Timm![]()
I know this storyline is supposed to be "socially advanced" but its no wonder it sold like stale s**t. Even for the times it was hackneyed, played out, and laughable.
Right. Sure thing.3) EVERYone is unconciously racist, black and white alike. Ask a psychiatrist. It's what we do with our biases that show our character.
That's an all around ignorant comment. The best part is where you say that black characters were 'played out' in the early seventies. You mean BOTH of them???
2) The line of reasoning in that quote is not a 'token' thought, it's drawing a concept out to it's logical conclusion which means a non-white character because it's what should've happened next, not 'lets get a black guy cuz there are none.' It was clearly "Lets get a black guy cuz he should've already been there..."
Gramatically, the "it" pronoun you used referred to the storyline, not to the thought process.mwm1331 said:I said that type of thinking was played out. Slave names, all whites being racist honkey mofo's, etc etc.
Katsuro said:If they really wanted to go for logic like that, they should've gotten someone from a whole different country. When we're speaking on a global scale, just getting a black guy isn't really much diversity.
Gramatically, the "it" pronoun you used referred to the storyline, not to the thought process.
But it is some. And yes, logially the concept that ALL major superheroes make their home in America is pure suspension of disbelief. Someone simply decided that the idea that all major superheoes are white was either too much or an unnecessary suspension. But point taken, they did not take this thinking to it's logical conclusion, nor, in the interest of storytelling, should they.
As for "slave names," I, personally am thankful that they didn't name him Lincoln Washington. Terribly thankful. I appreciate that they gave him a normal name as opposed to laying upon him all of the black stereotypes (positive and negative) that they could find... that was wise.

Actually John Stuart was created specifically because he was black. He was the defintion of a token character who was created specifically to be a minority.
from http://www.popcultureaddict.com/comicbooks/NealAdams.htm
Talk about stuck int he sixties, "slave names"
I also love how he thinks all whites are unconsiously racist, I know this storyline is supposed to be "socially advanced" but its no wonder it sold like stale s**t. Even for the times it was hackneyed, played out, and laughable.
No because MOST people don't watch cartoons....it seems MOST comic fans forget this. Most people would probably remember him being white if anything.
The General Audience has never heard of Green Lantern period.
Well, supposedly the last GREEN LANTERN pitch (the serious one) involved John Stewart training Kyle Rayner to stop Hal Jordan who was going Parallax. That's an angle I could see working on film. But I'd rather not see that in the first film of a franchise.
I know this might sound a lil silly, but I'm not sure we really want to touch too much upon logic and reality on the subject, mainly cos for all intents and purposes this still is just a conversation about a comic book character for which a great suspension of disbelief needs to be held in governing the rules and laws of said universe. Application of logic is not always necessary.
I mean hey, in Japanese manga/anime its the japanese who are saving the world. Remember this is comics. The producers are generally gonna cast whoever they want to , as their pick of GL, whether it'd be Hal, Kyle or John.
Fans have their own picks too and that I think is okay. We're allowed to have favourites. Some ppl want Hal , some Kyle and some want John and hey old school fans might be more interested in Alan and that's cool too.
I'll be honest. I LOVE Kyle Rayner and my inner fanboy would squee with utter delight if the powers that be {producers) decide he's the one they want to kick off the franchise with.
That being said I'm not that blinded as to believe that Kyle should be the one end of story. If I were to go with reason and by reason I mean big, good, strong, solid reason, I'd have to go with Mr Hal Jordan.
Why ?
Because in comics Hal Jordan is the epitome of Green Lantern. He's what a Green Lantern should be. He defines it. He's the fearless hero. He's the one who like it or not , set the standard by which every other lantern is measured . When we look at the series he's the golden boy, he's the star and so bright was his shine , the writers of GL couldn't completely kill off his character, heck they kept bringing him back even when Hal was six feet under.
And Let's get something straight. We're not talking about the Justice League. We're talking GREEN LANTERN here.
In the league , the only places that are pretty much guaranteed are the Big Three cos they are the stars. Only one Superman (Clark/Kal) , Only one Batman (Bruce Wayne) and only one Wonder Woman (Diana) .They're the best. You can switch around with the roster but without the Big Three the league is hard pressed to stand. You can even pick either Wally or Barry for Flash but you can't change the Big Three. They are the pillars of the League.
In Green Lantern , Hal Jordan is the star. He's friggin Muhammad Ali. He's the greatest one there is. Hal is the pillar of GL. You can take away Kyle and John and even Alan and GL would still be able to work okay but oddly enough you can't have GL without Hal without it feeling kinda funny. It's like Catwoman without Selina kyle. It'll just suck.
My point is simple. Hal is the classic choice and in my opinion ( of which anyone is free to disagree with) if you want the best Green Lantern movie , you just gotta go with the best Green Lantern there is.
If you want John , you gotta create a good enough story to drive it through, doable but tricky. If you want Alan , you gotta update him, workable but still a bit of a hassle. If you want Kyle you gotta build Hal's history first cos that's who Kyle goes up against, feasible but shaky and ultimately confusing.
Hal's origin is straight forward. Hal's story is defined and epic. Hal's character is iconic and legend.
Hal Jordan IS Green Lantern. No two ways around it.
My push for Hal ? Ben Browder/ Eric Bana. And Please , feel free to disagree![]()
Well, supposedly the last GREEN LANTERN pitch (the serious one) involved John Stewart training Kyle Rayner to stop Hal Jordan who was going Parallax. That's an angle I could see working on film. But I'd rather not see that in the first film of a franchise.
I have no friends who watch Justice League...and in fact we looked it up already and 8-12 year olds watched Justice League NOT 18-24 year olds. People, teenagers, don't watch cartoons...they watch sports and play video games. It's not a matter of opinion. You post on a site with comic fans, that puts you in a VERY narrow group.I strongly disagree. Before Batman Begins I had never read a comic - period. But I watched Justice League, everyone I knew watch justice league, people who made fun of comics watched Justice League. For people who grew up with it on Cartoon Network, it was a popular show that most either watched, or at least were fairly familiar with.
Any non-comic person who knows who the Green Lantern is, KNOWS he is a black bad ass named John Stewart.