Saint
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 13,591
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 56
I'm not making that argument; Franklin compared the sales of Kyle's series to the current volume (stating that Hal's book sells better because "it's Hal"), and my position is only that the comparison is flawed because the support for the book is different, and the climate is different. It's not a fair comparison.I've been trying to stay out of this particular argument but you guys have your facts wrong.
Kyle's book wasn't cancelled because of low sales.
The issue isn't "Was it pushed," or "Did it have good talent," but whether that push and that talent was the equal of what the current series enjoys--and it wasn't. With regards to creators, please don't mistake me, as I'm not trying to imply that anyone is a lesser creator (yourself included, obviously)--I'm talking about profile. Judd Winnick, for example, is a certainly a known creator (perhaps less so at the time he was writing GL), but he doesn't influence sales like Geoff Johns does.Kyle's book also had a huge editorial push for the majority of it's 10 year run.Kyle had top flight talent attached to his series as well, myself being one of those people.
Equally, while the book may have been pushed, it was not pushed to the level that the current volume is, which has been positioned at the forefront of the DC line. This is not merely seen in the books, but even in DC's marketing material--in the Ivan Reis promo art for the 2.99 price initiative, the most prominent character is Green Lantern, and that's something that wouldn't have happened ten years ago. GL wasn't getting that kind of push then.
Because the support is different, and because the conditions are different, it simply doesn't make sense for someone to argue that the current volume sells better simply because it stars Hal Jordan.
Incidentally, I didn't realize until just now that you were the artist who filled in for one of the Ion issues.
Last edited: