War Party
Ve vant ze money,Lebowski
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2005
- Messages
- 6,969
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
I was unaware they did that... which Treehouse is it from?
Season 9. It's called "The Homega Man"
I was unaware they did that... which Treehouse is it from?
I'm not surprised. I saw it at 1:00 this afternoon and it was almost sold out. Looks like it's still doing pretty well.
I've never read the book, and only vaguely remember seeing The Omega Man when my dad rented it years ago, so the story was mostly new for me. I thought it was really good, and it was scary as all hell. Will Smith just gets better and better in every movie he does.
I didn't mind the woman and the boy being there...it seemed they came in late and it was weird how they just popped into the story, but it tied in with the flashback scene when he said the prayer with his family and his wife asked God to send him help. Maybe it was their prayer being answered.
I'm hoping they have the original ending on the DVD when it comes out.
Doesn't the ending seem a little similar to the movie "Signs". In that movie the dying wife gives clues about how to kill the aliens and stuff...and in this...the daughter mentioning the butterfly..and how it appeared at the end.
Doesn't the ending seem a little similar to the movie "Signs". In that movie the dying wife gives clues about how to kill the aliens and stuff...and in this...the daughter mentioning the butterfly..and how it appeared at the end.
I hadn't thought of that before. It reminded me more of Children of Men, because both had a main character who'd lost faith in everything, and found it again by sacrificing himself to help others get to a place to make the world better in some way.
I think Neville pestering the dog about eating his vegetables was a substitute for what he'd probably be telling his daughter if they were all together. The look on his face when he picked up Ethan was so sad because you could see he was remembering holding his own child. When he was repeating all the lines from Shrek, it was probably because she had watched it a zillion times and he knew it by heart (most parents of small kids I know do too), but had forgotten all about it. To me, that was almost as sad as seeing NY empty.
I hadn't thought of that before. It reminded me more of Children of Men, because both had a main character who'd lost faith in everything, and found it again by sacrificing himself to help others get to a place to make the world better in some way.
I think Neville pestering the dog about eating his vegetables was a substitute for what he'd probably be telling his daughter if they were all together. The look on his face when he picked up Ethan was so sad because you could see he was remembering holding his own child. When he was repeating all the lines from Shrek, it was probably because she had watched it a zillion times and he knew it by heart (most parents of small kids I know do too), but had forgotten all about it. To me, that was almost as sad as seeing NY empty.
In Cinefex they said because they were going to have them doing all kinds of weird stunts that humans couldn't pull off, hence the CG.
exactlyIn Cinefex they said because they were going to have them doing all kinds of weird stunts that humans couldn't pull off, hence the CG.
there was no need to have real people if there only in it for 2 or 3 shots imo, thats why they just did all of it in CGI, and BTW don't forget that the dark seekers aren't human anymore, and obviously they don't act like it either, so you can't compare that with PalpatineThen they could have made them CG only when they were pulling off these weird stunts. George Lucas didn't make Palpatine fully CGI in all of Revenge of the Sith because he flipped around a couple of times throughout the movie. He just made those certain scenes CGI.
The dark seekers really did ruin a part of it for me, they looked very poor. Close-ups at least could have been people in makeup/prosthetics.
Then they could have made them CG only when they were pulling off these weird stunts. George Lucas didn't make Palpatine fully CGI in all of Revenge of the Sith because he flipped around a couple of times throughout the movie. He just made those certain scenes CGI.
The dark seekers really did ruin a part of it for me, they looked very poor. Close-ups at least could have been people in makeup/prosthetics.
Oh yeah, I remember her now..The woman interviewing Emma Thompson play Miss.Klugh in Lost
Anyway i loved this film regardless of the crappy cgi.
If this is still playing on Imax when I go to NYC in a couple of weeks I may see it again. It really needs to be seen on a large screen. I was in the front row craning my neck.![]()
That's where I work, 5th Ave, which is one-way street. I saw the signs on all the streetposts when they were getting ready to shoot there. I think it was an early Saturday when they were filming that shot.
This conversation begun a long while ago, so me saying this might be invalid. I remember many people saying the scene with the mannequin 'moving' its head wasn't shot from Will Smith's perspective, and that it was confusing and a mistake on the director's part. When I saw the film again this weekend, I noticed the scene was, from <i>his</i> perspective, inside the car. There was no fault from the filmakers with that scene.
.