I thought it was 13 dwarfs that Bilbo went on an adventure with.
Hobbit can't be more epic than Lord of the Rings, it wasn't meant to be, and shouldn't be. As Movies205 said, it's a much smaller and more contained story. Personally I think the Hobbit has more heart than Rings and could turn out to be even better though. I love the graphic novel adaptation, it's close to the novel so I have no intent to ever read the real one.
Hobbit Talks Happening?
Jackson, New Line reportedly trying to work things out.
by Stax
October 5, 2007 - Just months after New Line Cinema chief Robert Shaye said that he "would love for (director Peter Jackson) to be creatively involved in some way in The Hobbit" comes word that the studio and the Oscar-winning Lord of the Rings filmmaker are trying to mend fences in an effort to finally bring the J.R.R. Tolkien tale to the big-screen.
Entertainment Weekly reports that "there's reason to be cautiously optimistic" that the legal feud between Jackson and New Line may soon be resolved: "At this writing, no agreements have been announced and details of the negotiations are sketchy (neither New Line nor Jackson's camp would comment to EW on any aspect of this story), but sources close to the talks tell us that they're detecting a lot less frost in the air, and that a deal may be reached that could help usher J.R.R. Tolkien's maiden Middle-earth masterpiece to screens before the end of the decade."
A source for the magazine revealed there is a state of "detente" between the two sides even as they hash things out in court. But, as EW points out, even if Jackson and New Line agree to make the movie together the busy filmmaker may not have the time to direct it. One possible solution that's reportedly been suggested is to have Jackson exec produce The Hobbit, thus "letting him pick a proxy director and oversee the production."
one thing im worried about is that they will screw Gollum up in regards to the LOTR trilogy. since this takes place b4 LOTR, we shouldnt see Gollum other then in the shadows like in FOTR, because seeing him full on screws up the eventual reveal in TTT. this might not seem like a big deal since we already know what Gollum looks like, but im thinking for people who havent seen LOTR and future generations and stuff who want to watch the films in order
Ian McKellen talks about possibly returning!
http://filmonic.com/mckellen-ready-to-return-for-the-hobbit/
The Hobbit will probably be most like Fellowship in terms of tone..so if you liked the contained feeling of fellowship..GREAT!!
I just want to journey to middle earth again.
Good considering I personally think Fellowship is one of the greatest movies of all time while the other two are just decent.
Ian McKellen talks about possibly returning!
http://filmonic.com/mckellen-ready-to-return-for-the-hobbit/
yeah thats gonna be a problem. we'd be lucky to get this legal issue resolved by the end of the year. even without complications like the strike, i dont see a draft for this movie coming together until sometime late next year.Just FYI guys, absolutely no script in a pre-strike Hollywood period has been written for the movie. That's according to the Hobbit cover story article in a recent issue of EW.
Jackson returning? Making the Hobbit into two movies and in 3D?
http://filmonic.com/peter-jackson-directing-the-hobbit-in-3d-then-3ding-the-lotr-trilogy/