Movies205 said:
You know, I never understood why elitists used the term "
newbie" to insult someone with a differing opinion on a message board. You do realize all this term means is that one is new to a certain message board (which, by the way, I'm certainly not, so congratulations on misusing the word; I guarantee you I've visited this website longer than you have—Spider-Man Hype, anyone?). Using your logic, all the intelligent people who have better things to do with their lives than post on an Internet message board must also be
extremely unintelligent because if they ever were to start posting on one, they'd be newbies, too.
But if it does anything, my paragraph above just illustrates how absurd and meaningless your argument is: what does my join date have anything to do with my intelligence, open-mindedness, and taste in things? You simply made an asinine assumption because you're an elitist prick. All I did was simply politely disagree with your views on Peter Jackson—if that's not mature and conducive to intelligent debate, then I don't know what is...
Movies205 said:
How many Jackson movies have you seen besides Lotr and Kong?
Quite a few, actually. HEAVENLY CREATURES, DEAD ALIVE, and THE FRIGHTENERS come to mind. But the real question is what does this have to with me wanting Jackson to return to direct THE HOBBIT and why did you automatically assume that I hadn't seen any of his earlier works? It all comes down to the fact that nothing I said implied or even suggested that I hadn't seen his earlier stuff; you merely assumed I hadn't because you felt you were better than I was. Please get rid of the snobbery, kid. Yours isn't subtle enough to make yourself even remotely look better than others and the fact that you think this has any relevancy to the topic at hand again reeks of elitism.
Movies205 said:
Congratulations! You're wrong!
Movies205 said:
There not stupid they know there pissing off tons of dumb fanboys by not hiring Peter Jackson so the'yll make sure to get someone good.
Are you ****ing kidding me? Are you an idiot? How the
**** is there
any guarantee of this? In fact, history shows that this is
not true!
Movies205 said:
WHich will ensue even more ridiculous stupid fanboy remarks such as "New Guy is so much greater than Jackson" or vice-a-versa in much the same way Craig has about Brosnan... So I believe my condescending attitude is justified.
No, it's certainly not justified, first, because I
haven't even done any of the things that you claim justify your ****ty attitude toward me, and second, because I simply want Jackson to return to direct THE HOBBIT because he's already proven, in my opinion, that he's capable of tackling something like it. This is all you knew about me, yet you felt the need to assume other things that were
not relevant to the discussion at hand!
By the way, I thought Craig was phenomenal as Bond, so I recommend you stop assuming things about people and analyzing them upon encounter because, quite frankly, you're terrible at it. I mean, you've been wrong with every assumption about me so far—it's just embarrassing.
Movies205 said:
I didn't rant on and on about how James Bond was going suck because Bond was blonde. I didn't think F4 was going suck right outside the box because Tim Story was directing it.
Neither did I. Congratulations! What's your point? Again, I ask you how this is relevant to what we're supposed to be discussing in this thread? I'll have you know that I was quite excited to see FANTASTIC FOUR, too, but was subsequently disappointed by it—yet another incorrect assumption from Unintelligent Elitist Superhero Hype Clone #562. Yawn...
Movies205 said:
I've seen more and read more than the majority here, and have nearly all the time, given everything a chance before judging it, I've learned over my nearly 4 years of posting here, that the majority of hte peopel who post here are dumb fanboys who will eventually grow out of it or won't. They can't see past there narrow conceptions...
Oh, give me a ****ing break! You are disgusting—seriously. I mean, I just have to ask you this now that you've crossed over the boundaries of acceptable vanity: do you *********e to pictures of yourself? And this is an honest question...
How
dare you not only make assumptions about the intelligence and experience of me (someone you don't know), but also of everyone else who posts on this message board. If you're so damn smart and unique (as much you claim to be) how come you're a nobody posting on an Internet message board? Why don't you have a name for yourself in the real world? Please pull the stick out of your ass...
Movies205 said:
if you honestly think that JAckson is the only one who cna make a good Lotr movie, you=the dumb fanboy...
Dude, you're on a bloody role here—another incorrect label and assumption. I've already stated that there are plenty of other capable directors who could make THE HOBBIT. In fact, I've even listed some. I'd merely like Jackson to be involved in some manner since he started the whole thing. Please just get it drilled into your brain (if you have one) that the world is not as black and white as you make it out to be, that there is always more than one reason to dislike something or be wary about something. The fact that you cannot even grasp this concept goes against everything you've said about yourself so far and simply reveals your lack of experience and know-how in the real world.
So, listen, I'm going to break it down for you nice and easily: recall in the past when a new director has taken over the reigns of a franchise—the result's usually not a pretty sight, is it? What usually happens in terms of mood, style, quality, and acting—simple continuity? My point is that not only is it perfectly valid to be wary someone other than Jackson directing THE HOBBIT, but anyone with more than half a brain would be doing this sort of analysis themselves instead of brainlessly bashing others about whom he knows nothing. There's no need to feel threatened by other people's opinions. There are several other intelligent, free-thinkers in the world.
Movies205 said:
He is what he is, a noob... If he can't get past the fact that there are other out there that can probably make the Hobbit.
*
sighs*
Listen, I've already addressed this, so I'm not going to waste my time doing it again.
In the end, I hope people who read this thread will be able to see what's really going on here. You've simply proven that you're everything you claim not to be, that you're anything but open-minded when it comes to judging other people, and that beneath the surface, you're just an unintelligent dolt—a true fanboy.
That is all...
.
