Official The Hobbit thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1765&Itemid=99

Sam Raimi Will Direct The Hobbit?
Written by Robert Sanchez
Sunday, 28 January 2007
There has been speculation about this since last November but according to a major newspaper, Sam "Spider-Man" Raimi is considering directing The Hobbit.

Last November, TheOneRing.net reported that Sam was a potential replacement for Peter Jackson since he and the studio could not "make nice". Now the LA Times is quoting sources that say that Sam is indeed looking to travel to Middle Earth once he is done with Spiderman 3.

LA Times has the following:

In a move that would have ramifications for several major multi-nationals, and millions of fans, "Spider-Man" maestro Sam Raimi has been telling associates, as well as his corporate masters at Sony, that he is thinking of directing "The Hobbit," the prequel to J.R.R. Tolkien's masterwork, "The Lord of the Rings." At least two top-level insiders – who declined to be named -- have heard the words out of the director's mouth.

A year ago, such a swap of franchises would have been unthinkable, given that Peter Jackson co-wrote and directed the Oscar-winning "Rings" trilogy, but that was before the slugfest erupted between the once-rotund director and New Line honcho Bob Shaye.

Jackson is suing the studio over money he says is owed to him from the the "Rings" films, which grossed more than $3 billion at the box office and another $1 billion on DVD. In the last few weeks, Shaye has declared Jackson persona-non-grata at New Line, stating publicly that, "He will never make any movie with New Line Cinema again while I'm still working at the company."

According to a New Line source, the studio isn't just contemplating one "Hobbit" movie, but two. The prequel tells the story of hobbit Bilbo Baggins and how he first discovers the magical but sinister ring, the very object that drives the action in "Lord of the Rings."

Still, while Raimi might be an irresistable replacement for Jackson, his ascension to the directing chair is far from a sure thing. New Line says it doesn't have a deal with the director, and Raimi hasn't met with Shaye or production president Toby Emmerich. More potentially problematic is the fact that MGM owns the distribution rights to the film. An MGM spokeman insists that MGM remains firmly in the Jackson camp: "We support Peter Jackson, and when the dust settles, we believe he is the one who will be making this movie."

A call to Raimi's office was directed to his agent, Richard Lovett, at CAA. The agency did not comment.

For Sony, losing Raimi – who gave "Spider-Man" its distinctive visual theatrics – would be a blow. Studio chief Amy Pascal has said she wants to make six installments of the "Spider-Man" tale. Just this week, the studio announced it was rehiring David Koepp, who wrote the first film, to write "Spider-Man 4."

These could be all speculation or maybe the LA Times is just rehashing old rumors. We will keep on this story and let you know what we find out. The real question is, would Bruce Campbell have a cameo?

Will Peter Jackson now do Spider-Man 4??? Dont' be shocked.
 
Dammit:csad: . Besides the evil dead movies and darkman. Im not that big a fan of Sams.
 
Sam on The Hobbit will be interesting, but Jackson not doing The Hobbit is one of the stupidest decisions that I have ever seen in the history of cinema. :down
 
So its New Line VS MGM. I wonder who will win this one. But if MGM owns enough rights couldnt they just take "The Hobbit" to another studio & say **** you to New Line ?
 
I think Raimi would do a good job. Raimi and Jackson have the similar cinematic backgrounds and Raimi was always better IMO.
 
So its New Line VS MGM. I wonder who will win this one. But if MGM owns enough rights couldnt they just take "The Hobbit" to another studio & say **** you to New Line ?

New Line has the rights to make it, MGM has the rights to distribute it, if the studios dont agree and work together it goes nowhere.
 
Sam on The Hobbit will be interesting, but Jackson not doing The Hobbit is one of the stupidest decisions that I have ever seen in the history of cinema. :down

No, I think it's good. For the only time in the history of cinema, we have a movie trilogy that is perfect, every film of the same sublime quality and the climax is really a climax. Jackson must surely realise it's not worth tampering with that perfection.
 
For the only time in the history of cinema, we have a movie trilogy that is perfect

That is opinion. LOTR trilogy was good but it really wasn't my cup of tea. I would take the Back to the Future trilogy any day over LOTR.

But thats just me.
 
I actually like the idea. We have already seen Jackson's take on Middle Earth, sure it was great...but too much of a good thing is a bad thing. Lets see someone elses' take on it. Besides, Jackson is becoming a bit too full of himself (King Kong proved that) and his idea for 2 seperate 3 hour movies for the Hobbit is ridiculous. Raimi's vision for Middle Earth would be unique and fun to see.

On the same note, I hope that someone other than Sam directs Spider-Man 4. Just like I've already seen Jackson's version of LOTR and loved it, I've already seen Raimi's version of Spider-Man, and while I loved it, doesn't mean someone else's take can't be just as good.
 
I actually like the idea. We have already seen Jackson's take on Middle Earth, sure it was great...but too much of a good thing is a bad thing. Lets see someone elses' take on it. Besides, Jackson is becoming a bit too full of himself (King Kong proved that) and his idea for 2 seperate 3 hour movies for the Hobbit is ridiculous.

:dry:

Really?
 
I think they are gonna make two movies either way. :o
 
That was the rumor back in November after the original Raimi rumor. I think it is crazy.

Ok, I completely renig my statement about no Jackson being a bad idea.
 
http://www.cinematical.com/

Author Of Tolkien Books Says Peter Jackson Will Win The Battle
Posted Feb 5th 2007 9:05PM by Ryan Stewart
Filed under: Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Deals, New Line, RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Peter Jackson
Greg Wright, the author of Peter Jackson in Perspective: The Power Behind Cinema's The Lord of the Rings, has just penned an intriguing essay for TheOneRing.net. Let me quote the most salient paragraph in full: "The smart money is on Jackson making both The Hobbit and the other planned film, and making them with New Line. Will that take place on Shaye's watch? Maybe not. But since New Line has corporate masters who may be even more demanding than Shaye, that may just mean bad news for Shaye -- and good news for Tolkien film fans."

The rest of Wright's essay presents a number of points for why Peter Jackson will ultimately prevail over Bob Shaye in this battle of the titans, not the least of which is that The Hobbit is not easy material for just anyone to pick up. It's an "allegorical bildungsroman" that needs the steady hand of someone who clearly understands how to translate Tolkien for modern day, action-crazy audiences. Wright also speculates that Jackson is secretly biding his time until rights to The Hobbit fall back to Saul Zaentz, who claims that he is more than ready to pay Jackson a fair price for his work.

There are only two paths forward, Wright says: one that leaves Jackson's work on the Lord of the Rings trilogy behind and re-imagines a "Curious George version of Middle-earth" aimed squarely at the kids. The other path is one that moves forward with Jackson and all the groundwork he has laid -- one that integrates The Hobbit into the Peter Jackson universe and presumably has a place for the beloved actors from the original Rings trilogy. "Box office potential almost dictates the wisdom of the latter choice," Wright says. No kidding.

link to the whole article.
http://www.theonering.net/perl/newsview/8/1170723597
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"