Lets not forget that brett ratner is at fault for that, not bryan singer. X-men 1 and 2 were highly successful films, especially the sequel. So dont rest your case with such weak statements and points. Why is it that people bury the franchise and bash the director once the third film bombs ? I swear batman 3 is next and instead of praising chris nolan everyone is going to be bashing him... its so retarted.
I think you misunderstand me.
I was speaking about the X-Men franchise as a whole... granted it was specific to three but it was all leading to that.
I liked the first one but the second and third were not that good IMO. I repeat, my opinion, which should have no bearing on yours.
I enjoyed all 3 spider-man films but I am well aware that they have their flaws, especially in 3; which in the past I have been very vocal about the fact that I believed that adding Venom was not a good idea.
I still believe Raimi is a talented director, I even believed that before the spider-man franchise.
My biggest pet peave about the X-men franchise is how Wolverine-centric it is. Its a very successful franchise regardless of this and I am sure people can offer opinions on the merits of it.
X-Men two had little to nothing to do with Storm whom they wrote this weird interest with Nightcrawler as to ensure Hally Barry wasn't just a throw away actor.
again, this is all my opinion and I rest my case on it... which should have no bearing as to whether you rest your case.
Also, keep in mind that my statements are based on plot points, which are more the writer's fault than the directors. I like ratner.
So what you're really saying is:
"You're mentioning stuff about the movie that has no relevance"
I disagree as I believe it has strong relevance to the source material (comic).