One in the eye for intelligent design

Discussion in 'SHH Community Forum' started by sithgoblin, Dec 14, 2007.

  1. CorpusBlack Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bastards! :cmad:
     
  2. Sandman138 Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    11,644
    Likes Received:
    0
    YAY! Capitalism!:grin:
     
  3. SuBe Voluntaryist

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    11,897
    Likes Received:
    3
    That is funny that you say that, I was telling a coworker today about the UFP being Communistic. Funny how it came up on here too.
     
  4. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    You don't understand this science thing, do you?
     
  5. Sandman138 Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    11,644
    Likes Received:
    0
    To be fair, most of the people teaching high school level science don't either. I remember even my chemistry prof at community college repeated that myth that "a scientific theory has to be around for a long time and undergo careful scrutiny before it becomes a law. The law of gravity was just a theory at one time". I dropped that class.
     
  6. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    :dry: You did the right thing.
     
  7. bored One Sexy Lemur

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    13,282
    Likes Received:
    5
    Technically, it was a theory until it was actually verified to be valid. Of course what your teacher said about needing time to become a law is pretty off.
     
  8. hippie_hunter The King is Back!

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    53,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, there is evidence out there supporting the Big Bang Theory. So it is more than just faith to believe in it.

    However like a lot of things that happened before mankind came to be, it can't be 100% proven at all simply because we weren't there.
     
  9. hippie_hunter The King is Back!

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    53,323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Probability is luck of the draw in a lot of cases. There probably are billions of planets out there flowing with life. Plenty of them will be inferior to ours, plenty of them will be just like ours, and plenty of them will be superior to ours. There's really nothing special about it.

    And I guarantee that there are way more planets and moons that are incapable of supporting life than those that can. Mostly because of the very strict set of circumstances. Earth just happened to have them.
     
  10. Bill Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,624
    Likes Received:
    0
    Evolution is promoted to a great degree because it has been observed. The lack of evidence in terms of "missing links and holes" in the fossil record is more the fault of the mechanics of fossil formation than evolution itself. There is more than enough evidence in many different sciences to support evolution.

    But with all that, the honest scientist will tell you that it is the "best explanation for the complexity of life on earth." Science isn't about providing laws or end-all be-all answers. It never was. It is simply a sound method to find the best possible answer until new evidence comes to light.

    Intelligent Design is really a fancy way of saying, "I don't understand how things got so complex on their own, they must have been created by something." It's faulty logic at best with no discernable theory or method of testability, which invalidates it as science.

    Of course it can never be proven or disproven, but neither can the spaghetti monster. If we concern ourselves with all the possible variables of what can't be proven we would never be able to concentrate on what can. In the end, the best possible answer, which is all science strives for, is the one that can be supported by empirical evidence.
     
  11. CorpusBlack Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    0
    You certainly understand the 'how to be an ass thing'.

    Science is quite like religion. Our way is THE way and most people pushing either extreme are usually a$$holes.

    I may not know as much as you feel that you do, but I can still have my own opinion either way.
     
  12. Sandman138 Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    11,644
    Likes Received:
    0
    The law was proven mathematically, sure. However, there is still a theory of gravitation, and there always will be because you can't really prove why something like that is happening, only that it happens universally throughout the universe. Consequently, most scientific laws are found in physics with a few in chemistry, hence their more common name physical laws. The idea that the theory of evolution not being a physical law invalidates it is preposterous. Indeed, the notion that the theory of evolution could ever be a physical law is woefully misguided.
     
  13. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Opinion. That's why you're not getting this science thing.

    The scientific method (which everyone seems to disregard and which some people have to bring up) is the big thing of science. Of course it is going to be rigid... it's the rules on how to have something be scientific. If someone looked at the rules to be religious they might think they were rigid also. And in both, you have to follow every single one of them to count.

    And yes, you can dismiss something because it doesn't follow the scientific method, when you are talking about science.
     
  14. Sandman138 Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    11,644
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe his argument is that science is wrong or short sighted.
     
  15. CorpusBlack Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay. You obviouslly haven't clearly read any of my posts.
     
  16. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well now I know thanks to Sandman, there's no use in talking to you.

    Because what you're talking about isn't science, it's reflexology.
     
  17. CorpusBlack Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's not it either. Science is very right in a lot of ways. Now, this has completely gotten off of the original topic. What I'm trying to say, is that my personal opinion on Evolution Vs Intelligent Design is split. I believe that there is a little bit of both at work.
     
  18. AdamWestsGhost Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're a complete idiot. That doesn't even make any sense. It's psychobabble bull**** trying to be clever.

    You need a girlfriend man.
     
  19. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Someone doesn't like Penn and Teller: Bulls**t.
     
  20. AdamWestsGhost Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dude, f**k Penn & Teller.
     
  21. AdamWestsGhost Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dude, I get it. But some people apparently have to read to much into **** and over analyze it. Point clearly stated. Next.
     
  22. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
  23. Jerry! Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is just a ridiculous post. There are so many ways to prove you wrong on this, but its easier just to shake my head and laugh.
     
  24. AdamWestsGhost Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is absolutely outstanding! A f**king Wiki article? C'mon dude, don't tell me you get all your info from a **** site that allows my friend's dog to edit it.
     
  25. Gilpesh Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    26,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well that just means if your friend's dog can understand it, you can also.

    Intelligent design is and always has been a pseudoscience relying on the comeback, "oh yeah, prove me wrong."
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"