PhotoJones
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 24,050
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
His art is just too McFarlane-ish for my tastes...

McFarlane-ish?

His art is just too McFarlane-ish for my tastes...
Besides, how do you expect them to change what already happened? Another mindwipe or history change will only make things worse.
Joe Quesada said:There are no rules to his universe and from a storytelling perspective that's problematic. When you look at imaginary situations, worlds like the world of Toy Story or even Rabbit have rules of their universe clearly defined. Heck in Roger Rabbit it's very clear how to kill a 'toon, so the viewer gets the feeling that the characters can be placed in peril and have their backs placed against the wall. This is exactly what I'm looking for in regards to our magic characters. Rules that govern them.
Larsen rules. I just read the CBR article. I can see the point of view where Spider-Man "can't" grow up past a certain point, but I don't agree with it.
Regarding Dr. Strange:
That's a far cry from, "It's magic. We don't have to explain it."
Not trying to put words in your mouth, but if you don't agree with pete not aging past a certain point would you have him die of old age and have someone replace him?
Sure. It's not ideal, but I dig legacy characters. My main problem with not advancing him past a certain age is the age itself. I think Spider-Man with a wife and child could easily be just as interesting as Spider-Man on the dating scene. But I'm still seeing that in Spider-Girl (albeit a fast-forwarded version where I didn't actually get to see Peter actually raise May), so I guess that's something.Not trying to put words in your mouth, but if you don't agree with pete not aging past a certain point would you have him die of old age and have someone replace him?
![]()
McFarlane-ish?![]()