M
My Liege
Guest
Okay, finally someone with a response, a little half-hearted and albeit slightly condescending, but we're getting somewhere...Manny Calavera said:Wow, "ideally I'd only like to hear from people who are going to agree with me", what a joke. It's good because it means the game will take more advantage of the hardware it's on rather than being a more vanilla port. It's good for Microsoft because it will sell more consoles, which leads to it being good for gamers as it will cause their console to get more support and games. It's good for various reasons, and is certainly not bad, unless you DON'T own a 360, which goes into the reasoning behind the deal, to get you to buy one. If you don't want the game enough for a 360, then hey, great, you obviously won't miss it and thus it's of no consequence that you can't play it on your favorite system and you won't need to continue discussing it.
Okay, a game taking advantage of the hardware is good yes, but by that logic, we'd never get PSP or DS conversions of games, as they're clearly inferior machines. Yes, the selling of consoles is good, as we all want to see the market succeed as higher demand will lead to an increase in availabilty of products and an increase of resources available to the development of software, but the bottom line is that those too cheap* are going to miss out. I just don't see that as good. Sorry if sticking up for the little guy isn't cool enough, but it's the way I see it. Do we really believe that EA/Konami/MS need more money? This isn't some anti-MS rant as like I stated earlier, I own an XBOX and will be buying a 360.
Again though, for those it doesn't affect in the slightest, I fail to see how you can present any sort of argument at all, and the idea that I'm looking for a response from those who will agree with me is nonsense, but I'm willing to bet that those who are directly affected by this nonsense just might.
