deemar325
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 12,622
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
GNR4Life said:In my opinion,I think the book will suffer without DiVito on art.I mean the book is selling poorly and editorial decides to pull the artist in favor of a new artist whose style is different.I can just see people beginning to pick up Thing after seeing DiVito's art and being disappointed when they see the guy isn't doing art chores anymore.
Could be Marvel is trying to kill off any chance of it surviving.
I get this weird feeling Joey Q has it out for Dan Slott, call me paranoid if you will. Yet it seems Dan can't catch a break and especially when he seems most suited to write a book like Thing and Spider-man.
It's like they (Joey Q and JMS and others) realize Dan is a true Marvel guy, he's old school and they are reminded of what it means to be a true Marvelite in the Stan Lee tradition and they are afraid of him breaking out with a major hit, which would be the end of their snarky/hollywood schemes if Fandom embraces a guy like Slott.
I mean he wrote one of the coolest Spidey stories in a long time with Spidey/Torch and pretty much made JMS and 'Sins Totem Other' look like the crap it is.
Even guys like Whedon seem leary of Joey Q and his Bendis Brigade. Notice in all the interviews with Whedon theres this sense of 'I'm only here for the X-men' vibe and he seems to distance himself from whatever Joe and Bendis crew got going on. He makes a point to give props to Morrison's X-men and has a soft spot for the Kirkmans and Slotts at Marvel, rarliy does he praise Bendis and never JMS to my knowledge.
Anyone notice this?