It seems many people want Hawkeye to be a supporting character in this movie... but does it really have to be Clint Barton? Why not Kate Bishop? She'd be a far better choice in my opinion.
...Id like to see Natasha retired and living with her husband (Not Bruce!) in the suburbs post Infinity War when an event - a former colleague resurrecting the Red Room program? - gets her back into the game like a tiny pretty Liam Neeson.
Well, she has no family or friends from what I can tell so is a single lady looking for love... SNL parody was great.
I don't know if a sidekick would be warranted as she only works alone. Perhaps teaming her with people who get killed all too often would be the saving grace not to have one. Her day to day job, bit of backstory, integration of the infinity formula (distant past, present, and/or future) , and yes it could be a sort of Mission Impossible film of the MCU.
Certainly setting as well as supporting characters need to be just as important as the villain. I think maybe one of the background supporting characters could turn out as the villain.
If she's usually alone and doesn't want a partner, they having her stuck with a sidekick is absolutely the most interesting thing to do. And hey, maybe the SIDEKICK is the one that betrays her!
I mostly agree with this but I think you could get a lot more mileage out of the conceit of Budapest than just a 10-minute scene.
Imagine like Mr. & Mrs. Smith meets The Hangover or Rashomon. It could serve as almost a two-in-one BW/Hawkeye film and show not tell why they "remember [it] very differently".
I think it may be smart for them to have BW as the lead while having some of the other established female MCU characters helping out.
Will there be a standalone Black Widow movie?
I would like for it to happen under the right circumstances. I think theres a lot of opportunity to mine that story line. Shes got a really rich origins story. Theres a lot of places you can go you can bring it back to Russia. You could explore the Widow program. Theres all kinds of stuff that you could do with it. You could really uncover the identity of who this person is, where she comes from and where shes part of.
So if it happens, will it be a prequel?
Its a possibility. Theres plenty of back story. Or not. It could be something else. Where do the Avengers go? They are underground. What happens then? What happens after it all falls apart? There are so many ways you can go. I think it would just have to be very much like its own specific thing. It would have to have its own specific vibe. It would have been totally different than any of the other standalone films. I think if the fans wanted it enough, then it would probably become a reality.
Dont you think the fans want it?
Yeah, I guess. Marvel would know more than I do.
Are you still talking to Marvel about it?
Yeah, of course. I talked to them about it often. It would have to fit in the idea of where they want to go. Im invested in that character. Marvel is greatly invested in that character. If I did it, Id have to do it while. I still actually wanted to wear a skin-tight catsuit. I dont know how much longer thats going to be.
It seems many people want Hawkeye to be a supporting character in this movie... but does it really have to be Clint Barton? Why not Kate Bishop? She'd be a far better choice in my opinion.
Why does everyone want to kill Hawkeye all the time![]()
Instead of killing Clint you could introduce Natasha's new family in the solo project. We would meet Nat's new husband, who against all odds found love again after the tragic death of his first wife (Get it? He's a Widower! They're a perfect match!). And his two adorable young twin daughters, who in just a short period of time have grown extremely close to "Mommy Nat". And who can forget the family's adorable Golden Doodle puppy, Avenger?
Then you kill all of them off, even the widdle doggie. THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR TRYING TO FIND HAPPINESS ROMANOFF!!!!
This movie is more cruel than John Wick![]()