maybe, and he might've missed batman too (hint: hes the guy in the black rubber suit)Two Face said:Maybe Spidey fan didn't pay a attention....![]()
E-Mack said:His choice of cinematography just doesn't match up with the "dark and moody" feel of that pic. Plus his use of lighting on Batman reeaaallly sucks ass imo.![]()
yes!tinister said:Hehe. Would never happen - and may not even work in a movie, but would still be cool...
![]()
E-Mack said:His choice of cinematography just doesn't match up with the "dark and moody" feel of that pic. Plus his use of lighting on Batman reeaaallly sucks ass imo.![]()
Cinemaman said:As I can understand you hate everything about BB, don't you?

Not really, I actually quite love it. Am I not allowed to say what I find wrong with the film? Is everything so Black and white to you?Cinemaman said:As I can understand you hate everything about BB, don't you?

E-Mack said:Not really, I actually quite love it. Am I not allowed to say what I find wrong with the film? Is everything so Black and white to you?
![]()
...racist.![]()
I've already posted my love for BB plenty of times under a different name last year. It's getting old typing out all the things right with BB, because everyone here is pretty much in agreement here anyway.Cinemaman said:Well, I haven't heard anything good about BB from you yet.
And I am not racist, where is the proof of this?
E-Mack said:I've already posted my love for BB plenty of times under a different name last year. It's getting old typing out all the things right with BB, because everyone here is pretty much in agreement here anyway.
And it was a joke, sparkie.
.Cinemaman said:Well, Nolan proved that he is worth director for Batman and people don't have problems with him. But I cant understand you. You think like I liked this movie, but it is time to say that it wasn't good![]()
E-Mack said:.
OVERALL, I liked the film a lot. But that doesn't mean I have my fair share of problems with it. A major one being that Nolan completely took out the dark and atmospheric nature of Batman. And like Sage said, a lot of the shots in the film could've looked a lot better if Nolan lit him better. Look at Burton's films to see how lighting should be done. It was perfect.
Cinemaman said:Every new director puts something new in his movies.
BB had dark atmosphere, just look at that scene with Craine and his henchmen in the flat.
Cinemaman said:Burton made very good Batman movies, but it doesn't mean that everything what Nolan is doing is bad.
He told better Batman's story, made more logical script and put something new in this franchise, what worked well.
It has new vissual style, but that doesn't mean it is bad idea.
The atmosphere and lighting were what I liked best about the movie (aside from the acting) If I were going to take issue with anything, it'd be more of the story/plot stuff.E-Mack said:.
OVERALL, I liked the film a lot. But that doesn't mean I have my fair share of problems with it. A major one being that Nolan completely took out the dark and atmospheric nature of Batman. And like Sage said, a lot of the shots in the film could've looked a lot better if Nolan lit him better. Look at Burton's films to see how lighting should be done. It was perfect.
The Sage said:Yeah, it's too bad the rest of the film wasn't lit like that.
Huh? No one said everything Nolan's doing is bad. BB is better than B89 (though B89 is more fun on so many levels). And the only problem I have with the visual style is the lack of shadow. Before anyone yells realism, parts of Washington D.C. and NYC is lit darker.