Leenie
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Messages
- 4,296
- Reaction score
- 95
- Points
- 73
IGN's review of TASM was the most biased piece of crap I've seen. So glad the response was negative. It was a complaint about the reboot which he knew it was anyway. Robert Ebert's review nailed TASM, not biased at all. The IGN review should be subject to watching SM3 untill he likes it.
Where was the bias? The IGN review talked about some of the GOOD points of the film. Just because you disagree with a review doesn't mean it was a "biased" one.
If Sony was going to reboot Spider-Man this soon, then they should have done something fresh and new ... And there are plenty of people who think the movie didn't accomplish that. Myself included. If other people love it, that's all well and dandy. Everybody has an opinion, and I think it stinks when people get in "attack mode" because someone may disagree with their opinion.
(btw, I prefer Spider-Man 3 over this movie, too. SM3 is by no means a great movie, but I think it has a more cohesive story and screenplay than ASM despite the bloatedness ... But that's another topic.)