Proof of deleted scenes

NinjaCarm

Fantastic
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Sure you all watched Spider-Man 3 by now. Of course you all saw all the flashbacks in the movie. Anyone noticed the flashback of Harry hold Norman on the bed from Spider-Man 1?

Did not looked re-shot with actors from present day, looked straight from Spider-Man 1 from how they actors were aged/looked then...
 
Of course it was a reshoot.

Just like the dream sequence in Spidey 2 with Ben and Peter in the car wearing the exact same clothes was a reshoot.
 
Of course it was a reshoot.

Just like the dream sequence in Spidey 2 with Ben and Peter in the car wearing the exact same clothes was a reshoot.

My friend it LOOKED nothing of the kind. All the other flashbacks, even from pat 2 were noticeably re-shot. This ... wasn't.
 
Yeah, James looked younger, which made me think it was unused footage from the first film.
 
Yeah, James looked younger, which made me think it was unused footage from the first film.

Yeah, he aged the most out of anyone in the films. In Part 1, he looked like a little kid who I couldn't picture as the new goblin he became in part 3.
 
Yeah, he aged the most out of anyone in the films. In Part 1, he looked like a little kid who I couldn't picture as the new goblin he became in part 3.


Yeah I was just watching Spider-man on tnt and I noticed the same thing Tobey has stayed the same he seems to have never aged (I mean that as a compliment) and the only thing that has changed about Kirsten is her hair color and weight
 
Tobey's face isn't has hard as it was in SM1, in SM1 he looked young, he still looks young now, but not as young as SM1. But hey its been what..7 yrs so I guess people have to eventually age.
 
Tobey's face isn't has hard as it was in SM1, in SM1 he looked young, he still looks young now, but not as young as SM1. But hey its been what..7 yrs so I guess people have to eventually age.
 
I agree that the Harry flashback, was unused footage from Spider-Man 1.
 
Yeah, I think it was. Franco would have looked a tad older had it been a reshoot.
 
Yeah. He looks older than he did in the flashback of him holding Norman, plus it seemed like he had more hair than he did during SM3.
 
I really, really want to see the scene that was shot for Spider-man 1 with the original actor chosen to portray Eddie Brock.
 
Spider-Girl™;11652802 said:
Tobey's face isn't has hard as it was in SM1, in SM1 he looked young, he still looks young now, but not as young as SM1. But hey its been what..7 yrs so I guess people have to eventually age.

It's only been 5 years since Spider-man was released in the theaters dear.
 
I don't believe there was a scene shot with an actor cast as Eddie Brock. I know there were rumors, but I think something would've leaked to the internet before SM1 came out if it was true.

As far as the Harry/Norman flashback goes - it was a reshoot. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Norman wearing a black shirt in the flashback? When Spider-Man laid him down in SM1, he was wrapped up in a sheet. And as for Harry, there's this thing called make-up that can make people look younger. Part of the reason he looks older in SM3 is because he's put on a little more muscle. In the flashback, he's behind Norman and so we can't see that.
 
Eddie from J.J.´s mouth in Spiderman 1 = Same Eddie Brock from SM3?
 
guys, those clips were OBVIOUSLY footage from the first movie, when peter pushes the robber, when peter lays norman down, are all clips from the movie. The only clips that were reshot was after he laid norman down, they did a closup of spiderman and the suit is ripped differerently then it was in the first movie. As for the hugging scene, hard to tell, could have been reshot, or could have been unused footage. If you look at it slowly, for a split second you can see norman in the goblin mask. i thought it was kinda strange since harry never saw him in the gear, haha!:gg:
 
Well yeah I think it was unused footage. All of that scene that was shown was used/unused.

It seemed too perfect and alot like the original to be a re-shoot.
 
The footage of Harry holding his father's body certainly looked like unused footage from Spider-Man to me.
 
The footage of Harry holding his father's body certainly looked like unused footage from Spider-Man to me.

Same here. But they do have people paid a lot of money to do these things as if they were original.
 
It's possible that it is unused footage. Heck, there was a scene where Peter uses his webs to get people out of the way of rocks (times square). Then two kids see him and say "awesome!", and Peter tells em' to shh!
 
The question about Eddie Brock's mention in the original film being a blooper is false. Apparently, there was an elder Eddie Brock, Sr. who worked for the Daily Bugle in the comics. the Venom we got for the third film is partly based on Eddie Brock Jr., from the Ultimate Spidey incarnation.
 
The question about Eddie Brock's mention in the original film being a blooper is false. Apparently, there was an elder Eddie Brock, Sr. who worked for the Daily Bugle in the comics. the Venom we got for the third film is partly based on Eddie Brock Jr., from the Ultimate Spidey incarnation.

So you're saying the Eddie mentioned in SPidy 1 was Venom's Dad?? I think the Doc COnners mention was a blooper though.
 
It's possible that it is unused footage. Heck, there was a scene where Peter uses his webs to get people out of the way of rocks (times square). Then two kids see him and say "awesome!", and Peter tells em' to shh!

Yeah I remember that from a TV spot. In the film Peter still pulls the guys out of the way, but then it cuts straight to GG throwing a tantrum.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"