Apprentice
Guest
- Joined
- May 13, 2006
- Messages
- 2,539
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I don't even know what that is...
I understand your point just fine. It's that my analogy was really extreme. I copped to that and pointed out that the way debates are structured, all I have to do is point out a case where your reasoning doesn't work. I did that, extremity notwithstanding, and now you're just running in circles and accusing me of being extreme over and over.Apprentice said:No, you're missing my point. Go back and read the post you quoted, and then reply, instead of repeating the points that were already answered.
TheCorpulent1 said:I understand your point just fine. It's that my analogy was really extreme. I copped to that and pointed out that the way debates are structured, all I have to do is point out a case where your reasoning doesn't work. I did that, extremity notwithstanding, and now you're just running in circles and accusing me of being extreme over and over.
Darthphere said:Ok, so if they announce a comic book with Chuck Austen writing and Rob Liefeld doing art, I cant assume its going to be the worst comic ever? Because I can, and will.
Apprentice said:Thank you! You've proved my point! You can assume it will be!
Darthphere said:If I assume its crap, its crap so no youre point wasnt proved.
And an extra one for your great leaps of logic.
![]()
squeekness said:Sarcastic humor doesn't work so well in post.![]()
Yeah, I was rather proud of that one. I think I'm starting to understand why Joe Q likes to give the ok to kill Hawkeye and cancel Thor's comic and stuff.SpideyInATree said:His original point was that you're only assuming that something sucks based on seeing a trailer or preview. And that you can't exactly say that the entire thing sucks because you've only seen previews or trailers. You can only say that the preview sucks or the trailer sucks, and that the creative team involved sucks.
At least that's what I got out of it.
And then you guys toss a curve ball comparing the enjoyment of a comic book to the freakin' Holocaust.
Darthphere said:Did you have a point among all the crying? "Waaaah! Darthphere doesnt want to read this book, Waaaaah! He must hate everything" Get to know my opinions on things before you make such outrageous and idiotic claims.
ang_hulk said:you dont have a valid opinion-even opinions have to have fact behind them,you didnt read it yet you start reviewing it and critisizing it? doesnt make sense.In anycase if you did read the book youd just prove yourself wrong and the people with real opinions on the subject would be all the more right.
Mistress Gluon said:It's all in the read. lol
And I try. There's no way to ever perfect it without trying unfortunately.
I should stick to my guns with knowledge.![]()

SpideyInATree said:His original point was that you're only assuming that something sucks based on seeing a trailer or preview. And that you can't exactly say that the entire thing sucks because you've only seen previews or trailers. You can only say that the preview sucks or the trailer sucks, and that the creative team involved sucks.
At least that's what I got out of it.
And then you guys toss a curve ball comparing the enjoyment of a comic book to the freakin' Holocaust.
Apprentice said:Yup. So, Darthphere, you did prove my point. It's not a great leap of logic. It's what I've been saying all along.

Apprentice said:Ah, I love it when people ignore common sense!

Darthphere said:Once again. Ultimate Wolverine vs Hulk sucks. If I think it sucks, it sucks, I dont need facts behind that statement. Im not going to waste money on something I know sucks, which also includes Little Man and all Uwe Boll films. I dont need to read or watch them to know they suck I just do.

SpideyInATree said:I think you're afraid of them because you know you'll like them if you give them a chance.![]()

Themanofbat said:I've been giving the Ultimate books a chance now for 6 years, and they are crappy to me.
'Nuff said.![]()
