I saw it last night.
I liked it, but I couldn't help being disappointed. The movie didn't really feel like it was about Rambo, it felt like he was just a side character to a bunch of other people's stories. I also thought it didn't explore a lot of the interesting character elements and such that it could've, specifically with Rambo's character.
Here's a guy who's entire life has been about war and killing, and now he's living a secluded life and has lost faith in humanity and doesn't give a **** about anything...and he's faced with the choice of whether or not to go back to war after all these years. Not to mention, the difference between what's actually right and wrong in the world.
7/10
After setting a new MLK Jr. weekend record, the J.J. Abrams produced monster movieCloverfield (Paramount) was clobbered by two new entries, and while the spoof comedy
Meet the Spartans (20th Century Fox) and Sylvester Stallone's return as Rambo (Lionsgate) were running pretty close on Friday, the Spartans remained ahead over the weekend, grossing an estimated $18.7 million in 2,605 theaters compared to Rambo's $18.1 million. Ironically, neither movie was screened for critics until opening day proving the studio theory that reviews rarely help movies like these.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=41304
That is so depressing that Meet the Spartans is making that much. I can't believe that so many people go to those spoof movies.![]()
agree. this is how i felt at the beggining
"Help us"
"no"
"Help us"
"f you"
"help us"
"no"
"help us"
"go home"
"help us"
"no"
"help us"
"no"
"believe, faith, humanity"
"mmmmkay"
in all seriousness, i need to give this movie a second watching. it just didnt do it for me this time.
I just saw this movie...I went in with a good attitude. I was of the attitude that there is no way I could be disapointed. I thought, "This can go two ways. It might be good, but if not it will probably be so bad it's laughable so I might at least get a kick out of that." I have to say..I was denied on both counts. It didn't like it, but it wasn't laughably bad. It was just kinda pointless and simply...there. It had a LOT of graphic violence that just went on and on and on and.... I'm OK with violence..just it has to be meaningful. There really wasn't anything compelling here. The action scenes weren't really action. Honestly, what did Rambo do? He shot some arrows, set a claymore, and fired a jeep mounted machine gun for what seemed like 10 minutes...and that's pretty much it. I genuinely got bored of seeing people blown to bits, as it went on and on.
I never thought I would be someone to say this but it really felt like violence for violence sake. If you are OK with just that, then you may enjoy this, I found my mind wandering.
Wow. Sorry man, but I loved it. I honestly dont even know where you are coming from. Did you even like the other movies at all?
Haven't seen them in a while...since I was younger. I remember liking First Blood...and my dad took me to see First Blood Part II when I was a kid. I remember it well because it was a big deal to me for him to take me to an R rated film. I remember liking it too, It was more of an action adventure in the movie sense, but a lot of fun. I do remember being a teenager when I saw Rambo III and not even being able to sit through it, it was so bad. It went too far in the "cartoony" action adventure realm....So I guess I liked the first 2.
This one took itself VERY seriously. Maybe too much so, and I think it may have hurt it a bit. But it was addressing a real situation in a real way. I just wonder if that is not the way for Rambo to go. I think simply if it had a more compelling story in place of repeated shots of people being riddled, I would have liked it more.
saw Rambo earlier today. it was pretty damn good. like others have said, it was too short. i know it was an hour and a half but it only felt like an hour. it would've been nice if they added more suspense and made Rambo a lil' more vulnerable. i know he's supposed to be somewhat of a war machine but it's always more dramatic and involving when the hero is vulnerable and not indestructible.
anyway...it still had a lot of kickass action and believably brutal imagery that hasn't been done in a while, so i give Rambo a solid 7. i would've given it an 8 or 9 if it had more character development or more of a story, but the awesome action made up for what was lacking.
Take it you we're in the Meet the Spartans theatre when the line "Saving a life isn't throwing yours away" was spoken between Sarah and Rambo, eh? It was pretty obvious WHY Rambo ended up helping the Christians. He repeated it a couple times.
Yeah man, when I went to see RAMBO last night, ALOT of people were going into and coming out of that dumb movie. I can't see why people want to see that stuff.
After setting a new MLK Jr. weekend record, the J.J. Abrams produced monster movieCloverfield (Paramount) was clobbered by two new entries, and while the spoof comedy
Meet the Spartans (20th Century Fox) and Sylvester Stallone's return as Rambo (Lionsgate) were running pretty close on Friday, the Spartans remained ahead over the weekend, grossing an estimated $18.7 million in 2,605 theaters compared to Rambo's $18.1 million. Ironically, neither movie was screened for critics until opening day proving the studio theory that reviews rarely help movies like these.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=41304