Rapper Bizzle releases anti-gay version of Macklemore 'Same Love'

There's a difference between believing marriage is between a man and a woman, and equating gays to pedophiles as Bizzle did.

I don't take offense at the former, but I definitely do at the latter.

I think I've said this before,but I think what Christians are trying to say (and granted some communicate it better than others) when they compare gays to pedophiles is that in both cases you have an "abnormal" desire that (we believe) should not be acted upon.Not that both are to be considered an "equal" sin.

I think Bizzle even made the point that we ALL have our own pet sin that should not be acted on.Gay OR straight.If someone engages in prostitution,adultery,fornication- that doesn't make them any less a sinner than someone engaging in homosexuality.

The only real difference is the former is "abusing the privilege" and the latter "perverting the privilege".But at the end of the day sin is sin.And all sin can be forgiven.
 
Personally I think that comparing anyone to a pedophile for ANY reason when they aren't one is highly offensive no matter what else anyone may say and that negates any other things they say due to the fact that they have no actual idea of what they mean.
 
Personally I think that comparing anyone to a pedophile for ANY reason when they aren't one is highly offensive no matter what else anyone may say and that negates any other things they say due to the fact that they have no actual idea of what they mean.

I know what YOU mean Kev... And I agree wholeheartedly.
 
Isn't being able to state such views is part of what makes "freedom of expression"?

I never liked the word "Homophobia", 'homo' is part of the human species name, and part of names of other species as well, to use it like this sounds like excluding it to same gender relationships.
And the Phobia part is "irrational fear", disagreeing with an action and expressing dismay toward it is not fear or hate to the people who do it
Can I call someone who does not like to listen to a certain language a *choose language*phobe?
he managed to throw in all the cliches: I don't hate I'm just expressing an opinion, homosexuality is the same as pedophilia and God loves you anyway. the only thing missing is ''I'm not homophobic because I have gay friends.''
I believe the idea of thinking that way is to easily accept people in same gender relationships who choose a different path
 
I think I've said this before,but I think what Christians are trying to say (and granted some communicate it better than others) when they compare gays to pedophiles is that in both cases you have an "abnormal" desire that (we believe) should not be acted upon.

And how would you like it if lumped together religious people and pedophiles because they're both abnormal? You can't justify this. Comparing someone to a pedophile is a ****** thing to do.

You still haven't actually addressed that cartoon or my last post. Some dude acts blatantly bigoted and the ones deserving of a scolding are the ones who call him out on it? In what world does that make sense?
 
Last edited:
I think I've said this before,but I think what Christians are trying to say (and granted some communicate it better than others) when they compare gays to pedophiles is that in both cases you have an "abnormal" desire that (we believe) should not be acted upon.Not that both are to be considered an "equal" sin.

I think Bizzle even made the point that we ALL have our own pet sin that should not be acted on.Gay OR straight.If someone engages in prostitution,adultery,fornication- that doesn't make them any less a sinner than someone engaging in homosexuality.

The only real difference is the former is "abusing the privilege" and the latter "perverting the privilege".But at the end of the day sin is sin.And all sin can be forgiven.
Is this any different then lumping all religious people in with the "crazies"? And really, in comparison, how many are abused and killed for those heterosexual "perversions"?
 
I think I've said this before,but I think what Christians are trying to say (and granted some communicate it better than others) when they compare gays to pedophiles is that in both cases you have an "abnormal" desire that (we believe) should not be acted upon.Not that both are to be considered an "equal" sin.

How come they don't compare people having sex outside a marriage to pedophiles though? Isn't unmarried sex just as guilty?
 
Criticizing views, and not insulting the person or shunning him/her
It works both ways. You telling some they are "sinning" isn't an insult? Telling someone how they live is wrong isn't an insult? Why?
 
Bizzle....the most famous of the izzle family. Brother Drizzle and Fizzle do not share his same views....but mama Trizzle, a church going Christian supports her baby Bizzle and his stance against the evil gays.
 
It works both ways. You telling some they are "sinning" isn't an insult? Telling someone how they live is wrong isn't an insult? Why?
WOW, I don't know why these arguments surface all the time
Ok, if I steal for a living, and you tell me it's wrong to steal, does that mean you insult me? If you told me it's a sin to steal, is that an offence coming from you?
 
WOW, I don't know why these arguments surface all the time
Ok, if I steal for a living, and you tell me it's wrong to steal, does that mean you insult me? If you told me it's a sin to steal, is that an offence coming from you?
You are equating being gay with criminal activity. Are you saying being gay is criminal behavior? That in and of itself is an insult.
 
You are equating being gay with criminal activity. Are you saying being gay is criminal behavior? That in and of itself is an insult.
This is merely an example of how people react to two different actions.
Same statement comes from someone, two different reactions
Judging one action is considered judging people, judging another action is agreed upon by people as judging the action
 
People are too wrapped up in spiraling this thread into chaos and didn't appreciate my "izzle" family comment :(

Screw you guys..............I'm going back to the lounge.
 
Can anyone say NAMBLA? The fact there are some homosexuals that are actual pedophiles undergirds the characterization in the "song."

Pedophiles, period, are a waste of oxygen.

And there are heterosexuals who are pedophiles too, so what's your point.
 
This is merely an example of how people react to two different actions.
Same statement comes from someone, two different reactions
Judging one action is considered judging people, judging another action is agreed upon by people as judging the action
Why is the example always criminal? The comparisons, always criminal?
 
Why is the example always criminal? The comparisons, always criminal?
Cause based on experience, if it's not criminal people don't go too defensive about it and confuse judging something for judging someone
 
Cause based on experience, if it's not criminal people don't go too defensive about it and confuse judging something for judging someone
And thank you for proving my point. That is why it is an insult. You know exactly what you are doing.
 
And thank you for proving my point. That is why it is an insult. You know exactly what you are doing.
Of course I know what I'm doing, do you really know what I'm doing?
You know, wondering, asking questions, presenting how people react to similar sayings discussing different topics, and asking what makes each each
It depends on the person on the other end of the discussion how it's viewed
 
Of course I know what I'm doing, do you really know what I'm doing?
You know, wondering, asking questions, presenting how people react to similar sayings discussing different topics, and asking what makes each each
It depends on the person on the other end of the discussion how it's viewed
And how such arguments and discussions are introduced depend on the person introducing them. You choose to link being gay to such behavior, just like the rapper with the horrible name.
 
Can anyone say NAMBLA? The fact there are some homosexuals that are actual pedophiles undergirds the characterization in the "song."

Not unless there being heterosexual pedophiles undergirds characterizing all hetero's as well. So, in other words, you're wrong.
 
How can you compare being gay to being a nonce when most nonces are straight?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"