Sequels Received an email with a link to Superman Sequel news... Enjoy (link inside)

This is not an acceptable for Warner Bros not bring Brandon Routh back for the sequel or reboot.

If they don't want Brandon Routh for a reboot, then I won't even support that.
 
If there is a reboot, Brandon will not be involved.
 
If they do, I won't support that reboot.

I hear ya.

However, there is no way that they can do a reboot of the franchise with Routh as Superman because he is connected to the previous franchise.
 
isnt M from the james bond movie the same actress when brosnan was bond?

wasnt casino royale a restart?
 
I didnt have any problems with Routh but in a total reboot bringing him back is probably not going to work.

Really? Wasn't Casino Royale a reboot to the James Bond film? Last I check, Judi Dench was M again in that one. While it common reboot don't use the same actors in the role, but some can work with how Dench play M again in a reboot compare to the previous films where she was M.
 
Really? Wasn't Casino Royale a reboot to the James Bond film? Last I check, Judi Dench was M again in that one. While it common reboot don't use the same actors in the role, but some can work with how Dench play M again in a reboot compare to the previous films where she was M.
I think that is irrelevant. If they do a total reboot they are more than likely to cut all ties with SR including the current story as well as the man who played Supes in that movie. They will probably move forward with a new actor to start a new francise that features the man in the TITLE ROLE being Superman.
 
why does it have to be a reboot?

i hate with a passion an idea that a superman movie would again devote 30 -40 minutes of '' bla bla bla bla ''
a superman sequel (done right) could start with the action right away.
 
why does it have to be a reboot?

i hate with a passion an idea that a superman movie would again devote 30 -40 minutes of '' bla bla bla bla ''
a superman sequel (done right) could start with the action right away.

EXACTLY, a re-boot will consist of an hour of the movie telling us stuff we already know before any sort of action kicks in.

We have had the first movie with the re-introductions, etc, dont make us go through it all again, just give us a sequel that can start off with a bang.
 
why does it have to be a reboot?

i hate with a passion an idea that a superman movie would again devote 30 -40 minutes of '' bla bla bla bla ''
a superman sequel (done right) could start with the action right away.

Well you could reboot Superman without telling an origin in my opinion.
 
Well you could reboot Superman without telling an origin in my opinion.
i read your idea. i really did. i also read some other ideas from other people.

it could work. but that doesnt mean that Wb would do it. they would IMO do a classic origin.
 
EXACTLY, a re-boot will consist of an hour of the movie telling us stuff we already know before any sort of action kicks in.

We have had the first movie with the re-introductions, etc, dont make us go through it all again, just give us a sequel that can start off with a bang.
and to make it even more worse. superman has a tv-show devoted to hes origin.
not batman,not spiderman,......

superman has an orgin tv show.
spending so much time on this s... again is stupid IMO.
 
i read your idea. i really did. i also read some other ideas from other people.

it could work. but that doesnt mean that Wb would do it. they would IMO do a classic origin.

I don't remember posting my idea for a reboot?
 
I really like Routh as Superman, but if there is a reboot and he' s not brought back, I will support a new actor so long as I think he fits the role. I'm not so connected to Routh that I think any other guy can't or shouldn't play Superman, I'm like that for any actor in a superhero role.
 
I don't believe I did.
i mean you wrotte a post that the origin shouldnt be like in S:TM but it should start with superman in metropolis already.
if you didnt .....my bad.
 
i mean you wrotte a post that the origin shouldnt be like in S:TM but it should start with superman in metropolis already.
if you didnt .....my bad.

Oh OK. I did do that. I thought you meant like an entire story outline. You're right.
 
yes yes
happy that we are on the same page.

maybe 10 minutes of flashback and everythign else is focused on metropolis already?
 
Do it Indiana Jones style. Introduce the character as an experienced hero, and go right into the action and develop it from there.
 
Well you could reboot Superman without telling an origin in my opinion.

Or a partial and the occasional flashback. Something like Clark's first day at the Planet.
 
Or a partial and the occasional flashback. Something like Clark's first day at the Planet.

If they did, the story that had lots of action and good story telling was Robocop. The flashbacks were quick and to the point.
 
and to make it even more worse. superman has a tv-show devoted to hes origin.
not batman,not spiderman,......

superman has an orgin tv show.
spending so much time on this s... again is stupid IMO.

Exactly Dark B, we just dont need another origin story that will take at least an hour just to get all of the origin out of the way.
 
EXACTLY, a re-boot will consist of an hour of the movie telling us stuff we already know before any sort of action kicks in.
It's not only something that WE all know...it's something that EVERYBODY ELSE already knows!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"