Republican leaders claim Bush broke the law

[Spider-Bite]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13788092/

 

[Tangled Web]

Wow, hiding intel.

 

[Arkady Rossovich]

Its odd actually.Bush has most Republicans on a leash,and now the leaders are saying that he broke the law.How pathetic for Bush..

 

[JLBats]

Uh oh... spaghetti-os?

 

[Super Flight]

and you know what hes gonna do?!?! scream and cry and blame it on some one else

 

[Demon Within]

Trying to save face for coming elections by distancing themselves from him. He kills anything associated with him so its a good move by them.

 

[Super Flight]

so is he going to jail? as for jail i mean vacation and as for vacation i mean the beach with fine resturants?

 

[Danger Mouse]

so is he going to jail? as for jail i mean vacation and as for vacation i mean the beach with fine resturants?

I soooo wanna go to jail and not pass Go.

 

[Darthphere]

Uh oh... spaghetti-os?

Pretty much.

 

[Spider-Bite]

and you know what hes gonna do?!?! scream and cry and blame it on some one else

he's going to blame it on the media like Michael Jackson does.

 

[hippie_hunter]

Its odd actually.Bush has most Republicans on a leash,and now the leaders are saying that he broke the law.How pathetic for Bush..

Actually it makes the break away Republican leaders look pathetic and spineless as a lame attempt to pander for votes. But if you associate you're self with Bush these days, it's also going to hurt you.

As they say, you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't.

 

[Spider-Bite]

you know if you think your country will benefit from you staying in office instead of the opponent taking your place, then are you really spineless for sacrificing one or two issues in order to secure more important issues?

Is it spineless to pick and choose your battles carefully?

 

[hippie_hunter]

you know if you think your country will benefit from you staying in office instead of the opponent taking your place, then are you really spineless for sacrificing one or two issues in order to secure more important issues?

Is it spineless to pick and choose your battles carefully?

Come on, this is f**king Congress here, how long has it been since they have actually talked about an IMPORTANT issue. Banning gay marriage and flag burning aren't what I would call an important issue.

It makes you look weak because you side with the weak. The weak appears weak because they won't support their weak leader, making them look even weaker.

I'm just saying that right now the Republicans are in a crappy position. They're damned because they're the party of Bush but they're also damned because they don't even support their own leader.

 

[Spider-Bite]

Come on, this is f**king Congress here, how long has it been since they have actually talked about an IMPORTANT issue. Banning gay marriage and flag burning aren't what I would call an important issue.

It makes you look weak because you side with the weak. The weak appears weak because they won't support their weak leader, making them look even weaker.

I'm just saying that right now the Republicans are in a crappy position. They're damned because they're the party of Bush but they're also damned because they don't even support their own leader.

the republicans don't do it to protect the important issues, they do it to stay in office so they can get rich off bribes and lobbying. some democrats do the same thing, but some stay in office so that world peace will at least have a chance of existing some day, and maybe someday poverty, depression, prejudice, biggetry, and everything horrible in the world can cease to exist.

 

[hippie_hunter]

the republicans don't do it to protect the important issues, they do it to stay in office so they can get rich off bribes and lobbying.

Duh, that's what I am saying. They aren't distancing themselves from Bush over philosophical differences. They want to distance themselves from Bush because he's a poison. That poison hurts votes. However that distancing makes their party look weak, which isn't attractive to voters either. Their in a really f**ked position because both ends are going to screw them over in the mid-term elections

some democrats do the same thing, but some stay in office so that world peace will at least have a chance of existing some day, and maybe someday poverty, depression, prejudice, biggetry, and everything horrible in the world can cease to exist.

Please don't tell me that you actually beleive that the Democrats stand for that. We can say the same for ANY politican. I feel that the Democrats are just as out of touch, if not more, from the American peope like the Republicans. Just like the "extreme" right has taken over the Republicans, the "extreme" left has done the same to Democrats. I feel that they are more fake than the Republicans (mostly because of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry). What the Americans need is a new party that actually has a chance of winning elections over Republicans and Democrats, a moderate party.

 

[Spider-Bite]

Duh, that's what I am saying. They aren't distancing themselves from Bush over philosophical differences. They want to distance themselves from Bush because he's a poison. That poison hurts votes. However that distancing makes their party look weak, which isn't attractive to voters either. Their in a really f**ked position because both ends are going to screw them over in the mid-term elections


Please don't tell me that you actually beleive that the Democrats stand for that. We can say the same for ANY politican. I feel that the Democrats are just as out of touch, if not more, from the American peope like the Republicans. Just like the "extreme" right has taken over the Republicans, the "extreme" left has done the same to Democrats. I feel that they are more fake than the Republicans (mostly because of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry). What the Americans need is a new party that actually has a chance of winning elections over Republicans and Democrats, a moderate party.

hillary supports the war and voted in favor of the marriage protection act. she used to be considered to the far left, but she isn't anymore. she's more of the center now, which is why I don't like her.

Kerry was fake, I will admit that. he still is fake. the most honest politician's career was hurt because he gave an energetic speech with a "yeeeaaaaaa" that sounded bizarre, even though it was irrelevant to the issues.

Those things are exactly what the far left stands for. In fact it's the entire ideaology. You can't say that a politician who is pro-war,anti-gay, pro helping the rich is aiming for peace, and end to biggetry and an end to poverty.

just take a look in the dictionary at the definition of a liberal.

 

[Addendum]

Kerry didn't do the "yeeeaaaaaa". That was Howard Dean

 

[Spider-Bite]

Kerry didn't do the "yeeeaaaaaa". That was Howard Dean

I know that. if you look at my post I said Kerry was and still is fake.l I said the most honest politician did the "yeaaaa" thing.

 

[Addendum]

There wasn't any "honest politician" in '04

 

[Spider-Bite]

There wasn't any "honest politician" in '04

you can't speak for every single member of congress and every politican in the senate, and every governor, and every legislator.

 

[Addendum]

They speak for themselves quite fine. And it reinforced my cynicism

 

[Spider-Bite]

They speak for themselves quite fine. And it reinforced my cynicism

It depends on what you mean by honest, I guess, or what I mean by honest. What I meant is sincerity, in their desire to help their country or human race. If I was a politician I would lie and say I was a christain. I might be gentle in my critisicms over fellow democrats so as not to hurt my party. I would never accept any kind of bribe or try to get a law passed that would hurt my country.

one of the things I think people forget is that the party works together to stay in power or get in power and get their laws passed.

like for example well take democrats in the gay marriage issue. they all know ahead of time that the law wont pass anyways, so like one or two democrats decide to vote for it who are in close races or red states, to protect the seat so other laws can get passed later on. as many as possible vote against it, to make sure they are the party of tolerance and acceptance.

I think the republicans are being spineless preying on stupidity and politicizing prejudice when they vote for a ammendmant to ban gay marriage, that wont help even one american, but will hurt millions.