Howlett
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 794
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
The black officer who shot the white kid recently was not indited either. Where's the outrage and riots?Yes. Namely the police.
Happy Easter, Guest!
The black officer who shot the white kid recently was not indited either. Where's the outrage and riots?Yes. Namely the police.
The argument has been it's only really oppression if you're black skinned.
I call BS.
The black officer who shot the white kid recently was not indited either. Where's the outrage and riots?
The argument has been it's only really oppression if you're black skinned.
I call BS.
That's what I don't get. A lot of people agree that Brown maybe had this coming. Should he have died? No but he put himself in a bad situation. But Garner is an entirely different situation. It's like he's just bashing black people for the heck of it.You do realize that the issue is that you're having a different argument than everyone else, right?
And you're making a false equivalency with the black officer-white victim. Yes, it's still ****ed up that the cop got off if the circumstances reflect that the officer was completely in the wrong there. The thing is, that this sort of thing happens a hell of a lot with black citizens having to worry about the police, which is where the protests and riots are coming from. If you recall, I mentioned how I don't feel that Mike Brown is the example that the community would want to rally behind, given all the murky details and conflicting stories going on there. The Garner case is more open and shut and clearly illustrates the screwy practice of protecting cops who do the wrong thing.
interesting selective memory since it's been pointed out before.No, it hasn't. You're just saying that to discredit the opposition. No one here has made that argument.
I would have to no what specific incident you're referring to, but the protestors have been putting every instance of police brutality under a microscope lately.
Don't resist arrest.That's what I don't get. A lot of people agree that Brown maybe had this coming. Should he have died? No but he put himself in a bad situation. But Garner is an entirely different situation. It's like he's just bashing black people for the heck of it.
The media wants you to think that.You do realize that the issue is that you're having a different argument than everyone else, right?
And you're making a false equivalency with the black officer-white victim. Yes, it's still ****ed up that the cop got off if the circumstances reflect that the officer was completely in the wrong there. The thing is, that this sort of thing happens a hell of a lot with black citizens having to worry about the police, which is where the protests and riots are coming from. If you recall, I mentioned how I don't feel that Mike Brown is the example that the community would want to rally behind, given all the murky details and conflicting stories going on there. The Garner case is more open and shut and clearly illustrates the screwy practice of protecting cops who do the wrong thing.
What is your point!?The media wants you to think that.
again..facts betray you.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1651665/bil...rs-every-year/
"Police killings of blacks down 70 percent in last 50 years
In 2012, 123 blacks were killed by police with a gun
In 2012, 326 whites were killed with a gun
In 2013, blacks committed 5,375 murders
In 2013, whites committed 4,396 murders
Whites are 63 percent of the population blacks are 13 percent"
Want to talk about staggering percentages?
Black people are killing too many people % wise..
I think he's saying that it's okay for cops to shoot a disproportionate number of black people because black people as a whole commit more murders than white people.
That's what I don't get. A lot of people agree that Brown maybe had this coming. Should he have died? No but he put himself in a bad situation. But Garner is an entirely different situation. It's like he's just bashing black people for the heck of it.
I wouldn't say that he had this coming. Should he have been arrested? Probably. Should he have been shot to death? No.
And I'm ignoring "the facts" for now. It seems to be the cool thing to do, and I need to keep up with the hip kids these days and their Iggy Minaj and Ecto Cooler and Lite Brite.
So you agree with me while thinking I am wrong? Weird.I don't think I said he had it coming but a lot of people(ie Howlett) seem to think he did. He didn't do himself any favors with his behavior on camera at that store. I can see both sides of the story. The cop and his. But if I had to pick a side, honestly, I'd go with the cop.
There's a case to be made for Garner as I've said previously, not murder, but some thing like manslaughter.But Garner............there's no justification of that.
How many of the number of white people that cops kill do you think are murders?How many of the disproportionate number of black people that cops kill do you think are murders?
To who? It happens more often and is almost never reported on. And never rioted or protested over.If you'll go to the police abuse thread you'll see my posts on that. Police violence is out of control. But when police shoot unarmed white people, it tends to become an issue.
To who? It happens more often and is almost never reported on. And never rioted or protested over.
Because more often than not, that officer is going to be rightly prosecuted and face the consequences due to the fact that the victim was white. See, another privilege of being white in America.
The issue at hand is that cops are killing African-American's at a high rate and NOT getting prosecuted for it at all.
Because more often than not, that officer is going to be rightly prosecuted and face the consequences due to the fact that the victim was white. See, another privilege of being white in America.
The issue at hand is that cops are killing African-American's at a high rate and NOT getting prosecuted for it at all.
It seems like police training in conflict resolution needs to greatly improve. Both the Brown and Garner cases showcased really poor decision making by police officers.
According to some, Mike Brown was a victim instead of the armed robber and police assaulter he was deemed to be by people who were presented with all of the evidence.
Typo, should have said strong armed.What was Mike Brown armed with?
The argument has been it's only really oppression if you're black skinned.
I call BS.
Don't resist arrest.
To who? It happens more often and is almost never reported on. And never rioted or protested over.