Morrison definitely seems like he'd be more Pattinson's speed.Look, you're an actor who doesn't have the time or the expertise of a comic book reader. What do you do when you walk into a comic book shop that can be a bit overwhelming. Think how you first were when you did it. You go in and pick up the recent thing off the shelf because how the hell else are you supposed to know?
That being said, I hope he accidentally picks up RIP.
Yeah, Tom King is the absolute worst Batman writer.Oh god.
This means....
He's been reading Tom King![]()
Morrison definitely seems like he'd be more Pattinson's speed.
Yeah, I've said the exact same thing before, and I got some crap for it. It's way more important for the writer and director to have a understanding of Batman than the actor. It definitely helps that the actor have some clue as to what is going on, but at the end of the day, the story and direction is what's going to push the characterization. The actor will just help sells whatever is written.It's much more important for Reeves and the writers to use quality source material than Pattinson, so I'm not worried.
Yeah, I've said the exact same thing before, and I got some crap for it. It's way more important for the writer and director to have a understanding of Batman than the actor. It definitely helps that the actor have some clue as to what is going on, but at the end of the day, the story and direction is what's going to push the characterization. The actor will just help sells whatever is written.
But still, Tom King sucks.![]()
For me, his stories just drone on and on, and nothing substantial ever comes about. He's a bit too verbose, and it just comes off way too pretentious. Also, he constantly repeats stuff, and I don't know why he has to do that? It's irritating. You can tell he thinks of himself as being a much smarter writer than he really is. It's like he wants to be Alan Moore, but comes off more like a lead writer for a CW show, and even that's being generous, as I think the CW has better writing....but I think you get the point. It's like he thinks he's writing the new Watchmen, when really, he's just writing a dopey soap opera.Can someone explain to me what's so wrong with Tom King's Batman? I haven't read a modern Batman comic since the Morrison era.
I’m glad I’ve had quite a lot of time, I didn’t realize there were so many Batman comics. Hundreds and thousands. But I’ve been reading a lot of those, and not really just the kind of classics. I just like reading the sort of individual periodicals. It’s nice to kind of see the absolutely contemporary ones, the Tom King ones, stuff like that... I mean, it's interesting to see what people are sort of expecting, where the character sits now within that world. It's very different to where it sits in terms of the movies people see but yeah-it's kind of... it's interesting, I don't even know how much you'll even bring in from those comics but it's nice to sort of get as much assimilation as you can.”
But an actor has to be playing the character that the writer and director have laid out. They could have a completely different take on Batman. So for example, if he's only read Frank Miller's TDKR, and yet, Matt Reeve's Batman is nothing like that, then what's the point of Pattinson understanding Miller's TDKR? The vast majority of actors are there to act out what is in the script. Most actors aren't on the creative side of film making. Yes, an actor needs to understand the character, but in this case in particular, that character he needs to understand, is Matt Reeve's version of Batman, more so than some random Batman writer.Also, it's really important for an actor to understand his character lol. Sure he needs good direction and a script too but make no mistake, an actor absolutely needs to understand his character to get a good sense on how to play him, how to read certain lines, etc...
He could've done it in 5-7, but he has 100. His comic just keeps droning on and on. Someone, please, make it stop.Yeah, I don't know about his other works, but Tom King is bad when it comes to writing Batman.
Also, this man did not need 85 issues to tell his story.
I can't comment on his Batman, but his other stuff is brilliant, imo.Yeah, I don't know about his other works, but Tom King is bad when it comes to writing Batman.
He could've done it in 5-7, but he has 100. His comic just keeps droning on and on. Someone, please, make it stop.![]()
I can't comment on his Batman, but his other stuff is brilliant, imo.
I love his Superman writing, though. And he did a great job with Kyle Rayner on Omega Men, imo. Maybe it's more that he's better with mini/maxi-series than with long, ongoing titles, IDK.I heard he did a good job on Mr. Miracle. I dunno, maybe he's a guy who's great with lesser known characters, but not the super-iconic ones.
Tom King's really good at the character studying of Batman, in his comics. A lot of the individual issues are really good character analysis' of Bruce Wayne. Problem is...
he's pretty bad at literally everything else.
Either way, Tom King's not a terrible start for someone who simply wants to understand the modern day incarnation of Batman, there's plenty of character studying in them. Just not much else.