he deserves it IMO. He makes a movie, gets paid, then goes to Africa and helps children with aids...he's a nice manMan! Chris T is rich$$$$$$$ he was payed 25 MILLION + 20% back end gross!!!![]()
Man! Chris T is rich$$$$$$$ he was payed 25 MILLION + 20% back end gross!!!![]()
Saw the movie last Friday, and came out sorely disappointed. I really liked the first two movies, but Rush Hour 3 was terrible and one of the worst films of the summer. Aside from the bloopers, I laughed maybe three times throughout the whole thing. Most of the jokes were either recycled from the other movies or were just awful in their own right (like the Roman Polanski cameo).
And I know this is a comedy, and isn't meant to be taken seriously, but the script was just absolute garbage.
he deserves it IMO. He makes a movie, gets paid, then goes to Africa and helps children with aids...he's a nice man![]()
Actually it was $20 million and 20% back end, but you got the idea.Jackie didn't do much worse, you know.... $15 million plus 15% back end!
My guess is that he was the original writer for the movie before it became a Jackie Chan/Chris Tucker buddy comedy. The movie was not originally written as such. Ratner was the one that brought to Jackie Chan and got him on and I believe Jeff Nathanson was the un-credited writer that tailored it to Chan and Tucker.I would love to know why the dude who wrote the original Rush Hour, Ross LaManna, hasn't had a job since? I thought that was easily the best one. Who the hell threw him out on the street?
It was funny but not better than the first 2. Where was Jackie chan stunts??? there s nothing spectacular compare to the previous one.
He was too old to be doing that stuff.![]()
VileOne, I don't really enjoy putting you on the spot, but I must. I saw that you rated this movie with the lowest rating. Here's the thing that confuses me. You've not only been adament of your Brett Ratner hate, but also your extreme dislike of the Rush Hour franchise as a whole, as well as dogging this film before you saw it, talking about this movie in the Bourne thread, quoting Kal-El 8 and saying how a Rush Hour movie is not worthy of 4 and 5 stars, and constantly discussing/posting box office results.
Did you actually watch Rush Hour 3 before you voted on the poll?
Did you seriously pay 9 bucks to watch a film that you seemed to have no interest in?
![]()
I'm pretty sure that's an exaggeration - even freaking Waterworld managed to be profitable a little over a year after it's release thanks to people checking it out on video. I mean, c'mon. If this thing does even as well as Rise of the Silver Surfer did, I think it's got an easy profit ahead of it overseas. But it'll never been as the hit the first two were.
yeah, I think he is...Are you a film critic?
Are you a film critic?
Now where the hell are you getting this? BS I tell you...BS!Also, let's be honest about something else. Jackie Chan has been publically honest that he HATES these movies and he doesn't like doing them, and he only does them for the money.
So it's kind of telling because you see that in his work here. It's total, "Just here for the paycheck" performance work.
Now where the hell are you getting this? BS I tell you...BS!![]()
Also, let's be honest about something else. Jackie Chan has been publically honest that he HATES these movies and he doesn't like doing them, and he only does them for the money.
Wrong! check Bishop2's post...He said so in an interview for THE TUXEDO on CHUD.COM several years ago.