It's all part of it. People move films to different time slots all the time. It is what it is. It still falls on the director. Now I started the thread just to see how people felt about the directors. If you like both or one that's ok. But please don't make it personal or make excuses. These directors make big $$$ to do arts and crafts. If they do great or bomb that's their career not ours.
Same to you, if you like superhero movies more than girly kids movies, or you like both, or neither that's fine. But if you say Box Office falls on director, and we're having a discussion, then my question is if you think Edgar Wright's box office are evidence of his lack of ability in comparison to Michael Bay. Analyzing is not taking it personal. More information rather than less isn't making excuses.
The reason is pretty obvious. Both directors (Coogler to a larger extent) have recently been spotlighted as pushers of diversity by making blockbusters fronted by black people and/or women.
Is A Wrinkle In Time a blockbuster? Was Where the Wild Things Are a blockbuster we can compare to that year's Avatar in any significant way? It is obvious that they are not comparable. Would they be comparable if they were both about Black characters? How would we compare them? Box Office? RT score? The reason is obvious, you're right, but the absurdity of the reason only scarcely less obvious. I mean, if the only reason we're comparing them is because they're diverse, then shouldn't the comparison be about their diversity?
This is a brilliant thread and will be nominated as of of the years best. You might get some rough competition with that other one tho! The one about pepsi v coca cola.
Ava, I personally feel, is somewhat overrated and Wrinkle of Time shows she may not have the reach of some directors who can handle multiple genres
Part of the discussion I see missing is what AWIT is. It seems to be discussed as though it is a genre film that any other director could possibly reach, and all evidence points to the contrary.
It's kind of like if someone not familiar with skating sees someone falter on a quintuple axel, and says "She's overrated it shows she may not have the reach of other skaters who can do multiple jumps." But for those who know what a quintuple axel is, even partially completing the quintuple axel itself is proof that she can do all of those other jumps.
The other half I see missing from discussion here and elsewhere is what AWIT is not. Part of it not being Black Panther, other than not being a "blockbuster" film, is that it is a film that is in a way hostile to a culture that rejects things targeted at tween girls. In a discussion about which appeals more, part of the discussion should be that Ava Duvernay is not trying to appeal to adult males
at all with her latest film, because that's a HUGE deal. I mean, how can you talk about how much someone appeals to you without acknowledging that they are the only ones not trying to?
It should have been "The Dark Knight vs. Ava Duvernay".
It should have been. Mods, can we get a title change?