the sad thing is that Daredevil is such a great character who got an average/bad movie, despite the director's cut.
See I don't get the hate for Daredevil. The DC was a GREAT film I think. The only thing that let's it down is the silly playground fight and some dodgy CGI.
And Reynolds will play both.
The guy has been banging on about Deadpool since 2002. So what? He patiently waits 7 YEARS for the chance to make a Deadpool film, Deadpool finally gets green lit THEN he decides. "You know what? I've waited for this for 7 years, now the chance is here I'm gonna **** it off!"
C'mon...
Deadpool was never gonna be out before 2012 regardless of GL. What's Reynolds supposed to do? Just stop everything for Deadpool? Course not. He's done what a young actor with his star on the rise SHOULD do. Get another gig.
GL will be the "event" movie for him. Deadpool will more than likely be a cult film in the mold of Blade that he wants to do simply because he wants to do be Deadpool. Simple as that.
And as far as popularity goes. I'd say that at this present time they are pretty close.
Sure GL has the prestige of being a old school Golden Age character. And he has the big Blackest Night event.
But Deadpool has 2 ongoing series that sell at around 50-60,000 EACH. A highly praised mini series, multiple appearances in other comic book characters books PLUS he is now getting a THIRD ongoing series.
You don't get three ongoing series, multiple cross-overs and appearances and not be bonafide A-List. That's a fact.
And both characters can provide rich story telling opportunities. Obviously GL is the epic space saga. But then Deadpool is more of a psychological character. I mean, a story about a mercenary who gets terminal cancer, leaves the love of his life so she doesn't share his pain, goes to extreme lengths to cure cancer, but ends up even worse than before, physically and mentally scarred, makes for a compelling story even without the fourth wall breaking, the satire, the bonkers humour and the ninja/soldier stuff.