Scientist discovers way to burn water.

[Joker]

What are the bug people plotting to do?

reffer to the thread about sumofgod no longer being here to make crazy conspiracy (propaganda!) theories about 9/11 this year.

 

[blind_fury]

Let's just skip to the end where we break out the tin-foil hats already.

Yeah that would be like trying to connect 9-11 to Iraq and invading.

crazy man.

 

[kedrell]

I never needed there to be a connection between 9/11 and Iraq. I'm always for an invasion.t:

 

[SuperMonkey]

Joker, those are the reptoid people. MAKE UP YOUR MIND! DON'T YOU KNOW ANYTHING? SHEESH!

 

[Joker]

Joker, those are the reptoid people. MAKE UP YOUR MIND! DON'T YOU KNOW ANYTHING? SHEESH!

no, he was posting anti-reptoid propoganda in there...it's the bugpeople who are really behind it all

 

[blind_fury]

It's awesome the public is numb to the possibility of conspiracies.

awesome.

 

[kedrell]

No, they just require a little thing called proof.

 

[blind_fury]

No, they just require a little thing called proof.

Did you know there was a secret meeting between Nazi Leaders long before the Holocaust to plan it?

Of course we know about it now because the Allied powers won, but...

 

[kedrell]

^With a guy like Hitler in charge, a secret meeting wouldn't have been a real strech of the imagination. And don't even go there trying to compare America today to Nazi Germany. People who make that arguement lose all credibility.

 

[SuperMonkey]

indeed

 

[blind_fury]

If you think someone has to be as openly evil as Hitler to conspire against the masses then you are terribly naive.

 

[kedrell]

Never said that. But in an open society like this(which Nazi Germany never was even before it was Nazi) conspiracies just don't work. Didn't work for Nixon, Clinton and won't work for Bush. You need a totalitarian state for them to work so you can control the media.

 

[blind_fury]

You don't need a totalitarian state to conspire.

You need the willing and the able and a private space.

 

[kedrell]

You don't need a totalitarian state to conspire.

No, but you do if you expect to succeed. And conspiracies that fail don't bother me.

 

[Super Kal]

damn... I hope they get this to work

 

[kedrell]

Me too, my pocket book demands it!

 

[Super Kal]

Me too, my pocket book demands it!

lmao, mine too

 

[blind_fury]

No, but you do if you expect to succeed. And conspiracies that fail don't bother me.

The well executed conspiracies are never discovered.

The very definition of a failed conspiracy is discovery.

 

[kedrell]

If they're undiscovered, what makes you think they exist? By definition you have no proof.

 

[carrrnuttt]

Wow.

I love how they keep cutting out VERY important pieces of the story from these reprinted articles, just like in the "Tortured Black Woman" thread.

Here's the original: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07252/815920-85.stm

Mr. Kanzius' discovery was an accident.

He developed the RF generator as a novel cancer treatment. His research in targeting cancer cells with metallic nanoparticles then destroying them with radio-frequency is proceeding at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and at the University of Texas' MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Manuscripts updating the cancer research are in preparation for publication in coming months, Mr. Kanzius said.

While Mr. Kanzius was demonstrating how his generator heated nanoparticles, someone noted condensation inside the test tube and suggested he try using his equipment to desalinate water.

So, Mr. Kanzius said, he put sea water in a test tube, then trained his machine on it, producing an unexpected spark. In time he and laboratory owners struck a match and ignited the water, which continued burning as long as it remained in the radio-frequency field.

I don't know who this "Mr. Kanzius" is, but I see a Nobel prize somewhere in his future if ANY aspect of his research pans out.

 

[blind_fury]

If they're undiscovered, what makes you think they exist? By definition you have no proof.

Nothing is wrong with being skeptical of those in power.

You seem to have ruled out the possibility of secret meetings that effect public policy.

It's really not that hard to do.

 

[kedrell]

Thanks for that carrrnuttt.

 

[kedrell]

Nothing is wrong with being skeptical of those in power.

You seem to have ruled out the possibility of secret meetings that effect public policy.

It's really not that hard to do.

Not hard to hold them, but to keep them secret, yeah, that's damn near impossible unless they're legitimate like a closed session of congress. And I'm not saying don't be skeptical of those in power. I'm just saying don't go off the deep end.

 

[carrrnuttt]

Thanks for that carrrmuttt.

I don't know whether to say "welcome", or to be pissed that you called me a mutt...

 

[kedrell]

I don't know whether to say "welcome", or to be pissed that you called me a mutt...

Sorry, misread my screen.